| 1. |
- Andersson, Peter K., 1982-
(författare)
-
Har humorn en historia?
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Scandia. - : Scandia. - 0036-5483. ; 88:1
-
Recension (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Denna temarecension diskuterar tre relativt nyutkomna böcker om humorns historia.A Cultural History of Comedy, vol. 1-6AThe Palgrave Handbook of Humour, History, and MethodologysamtGudomliga komedier. Humor, subjektivitet, transcendens. vol. 1–3
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Ekholst, Christine, et al.
(författare)
-
En olydig sodomit. : Om Magnus Eriksson och det heteronormativa regentskapet.
- 2007
-
Ingår i: Scandia: Tidskrift för historisk forskning. - Stockholm : Natur och kultur. - 0036-5483. ; 73:2
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This article discusses how accusations of sodomy were used as a political weapon during the late Middle Ages. With St. Birgitta’s accusations of sodomy against the Swedish king Magnus Eriksson in the 1360s as a starting point, we study how sodomy was used as political propaganda and why it was effective. We argue that these allegations must be seen as part of a wider European political pattern. Numerous cases of similar charges can be found throughout late medieval Europe. All arise in troublesome political situations when the power struggle between king and aristocracy had reached a high point.We claim that a queer reading of the medieval texts reveals the great importance of heteronormative sexuality manifested in marital intimacy. To diverge from what we call a heteronormative kingship was regarded so seriously that it could be the very foundation of criticism against a king. The sodomite was an established figure of thought that captured all the faults of king Magnus Eriksson: his heresy, his thoughtlessness, his lasciviousness, his indecisiveness and his inclination to keep young and depraved men as advisors. The sodomite threatened the gender order and by doing so he jeopardized the entire social order. In other words, the accusations of sodomy made it possible for Magnus’ critics to articulate his inability to be master in his own marriage and consequently master of his realm. A sodomite was clearly not suited to be king and the charges of sodomy could thus be used to justify a dethronement.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
- Isacsson, Alexander, 1993-
(författare)
-
Dynastisk centralisering i 1560-talets Sverige : "Reservens dilemma" och hertigarnas resning 1568
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Scandia. - : Lunds universitet. - 0036-5483. ; 87:1, s. 11-37
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In a previous issue of Scandia (2019:2), historian Liesbeth Geevers argued that “new dynastic history” has emerged as a field within the discipline of history. This article elaborates on some of her suggestions discussing the fraternal conflicts in Sweden in the 1560s from the perspectives of dynastic centralisation and “the problem of the spare”. The conflicts between Erik XIV and his brothers, Duke Johan and Duke Karl, in the early 1560s and the rise of the dukes in 1568 are mainly studied through printed source material in the form of public speeches, libels and accusations exchanged between the brothers.
|
|
