| 1. |
- Brink Pinto, Andres, et al.
(författare)
-
Contentious Politics Studies : Forskningsfältet social och politisk konfrontation på frammarsch i Skandinavien
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Scandia. - 0036-5483. ; 81:1, s. 93-110
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In the last decade or so an increasing number of researchers in Scandinavia have become interested in the research field of contentious politics studies (CPS). The result has been a growing number of publications focusing on political contention. We have now reached the point where international research networks are being set up. Several interesting workshops and book projects are underway underscoring the rise of the field in Scandinavia. This article has three purposes: to introduce the field and its historiography from the 1990s to the present, along with its most important theoretical perspectives; to take on the thorny issue of translating the term contention into the Scandinavian languages, and indeed to argue for the importance of arriving at a workable definition of the term; and to survey the field as it stands in early twenty-first-century Scandinavia. In the article, the authors conclude that there are some district differences in the approach to the field in the three Scandinavian countries. In Sweden much of the research of the past decade or so has been micro-historical in approach, resulting in a number of in-depth studies of different episodes of contention. In contrast, the research done in Denmark has been largely macro-historical, focusing on longitudinal studies of contentious issues from the nineteenth to the twenty-first centuries. The authors argue here that much can be gained by researchers from these different approaches working together, influencing one another in terms of theory and methodology alike. In conclusion, the authors argue for the importance of transregional and/or transnational studies of political contention
|
|
| 2. |
- Brink Pinto, Andrés
(författare)
-
En etik för arkivet?
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Scandia. - : Scandia: Tidskrift for historisk forskning, Lund University. - 0036-5483. ; 88:1, s. 93-108
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- In comparison to disciplines within the humanities and social sciences working directly with living humans, as well as in comparison to oral history, historians primarily working with archival sources lack a living discussion on ethics in connection with our methods. At the same time, archival sources that contain sensitive personal information are central in many fields – such as queer history – and the Swedish Ethical Review Authority has recently started to examine academic compliance with the Law on Ethical Review.In relation to this and the need to find an ethical approach to my own sources, this essay is an attempt to stimulate a discussion on how historians can work with sensitive archival sources in an ethical manner. I do so by deliberating on three ethical positions – process ethics, ethics of care and duty-based ethics – and an attempt to reason regarding their respective consequences and benefits in terms of working with archival sources. The essay ends with an argument in favour of duty-based ethics and critique as a way to construct ourselves as ethical subjects in relation to our duty as historians.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Brink Pinto, Andrés
(författare)
-
Why Learn History? (When It's Already on Your Phone)
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Scandia. - 0036-5483. ; 86:2, s. 151-152
-
Recension (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Recension av Sam Wineburg, Why Learn History? (When It's Already on Your Phone), University of Chicago Press, 2018
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
