| 1. |
- Hellberg, Dan, et al.
(författare)
-
Pitfalls in immunohistochemical validation of tumor marker expression : exemplified in invasive cancer of the uterine cervix
- 2009
-
Ingår i: Gynecologic Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0090-8258 .- 1095-6859. ; 112:1, s. 235-240
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVES: To study if immunohistochemical expression of tumor markers as prognostic predictors is influenced by clinical stage, adjustments for expression of other tumor markers and histological type in cervical cancer. METHODS: The study included 129 women with squamous cell cancer and 29 women with adenocarcinomas. Expression of 9 tumor markers relevant for cervical cancer and selected to represent different mechanisms in carcinogenesis was analysed. These were Ki-67, c-myc, LRIG1, p-53, p-27, CD44, VEGF, Cox-2 and CD4+. RESULTS: In late-stage cancer a higher number of tumor-infiltrating CD4 positive cells were associated with a favourable prognosis while a higher Ki-67 index with a poor prognosis. In early-stage cancer a high LRIG1 expression was associated with a favourable prognosis. Significantly different expressions were found at early-stage versus at late-stage squamous cell cancer for VEGF, p27 and LRIG1 which were all more strongly expressed in early stages. Adjustments for all selected tumor markers and clinical stage converted VEGF and LRIG1 expression from non-significant to significant prognostic predictors while the association between p53 expression and good prognosis was strengthened. Adjustments for Cox-2 and c-myc had the strongest impact on VEGF as a prognosis predictor and LRIG1 was most influenced by adjustment for p53. All correlations became non-significant when women with adenocarcinoma and other invasive tumor types were included. CONCLUSIONS: Failure to analyse clinical stages separately, failure to adjust for expression of relevant concurrent tumor markers and inclusion of different histological subtypes into the same study group may lead to false conclusions regarding the significance of prognostic tumor markers.
|
|
| 2. |
- Lindström, Annika K, 1953-, et al.
(författare)
-
Correlation between LRIG1 and LRIG2 expressions and expression of 11 tumor markers, with special reference to tumor suppressors, in CIN and normal cervical epithelium
- 2011
-
Ingår i: Gynecologic Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0090-8258 .- 1095-6859. ; 122:2, s. 372-376
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective. Novel biological markers LRIG1 and LRIG2 have been associated with favorable as well as poor prognosis, respectively, in different cancer types, including cervical cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate possible interactions between these proteins and other tumor markers, and as diagnostic adjuncts in CIN. Methods. Cervical biopsies from 171 women, with normal epithelium, and low-grade and high-grade CIN were stained for LRIG1 and LRIG2, and 11 additional tumor markers. The tumor markers were chosen to be relevant in cervical neoplasms. Staining was evaluated semiquantitatively. Results. Expression of LRIG1 and LRIG2 was found to correlate with increasing CIN grade, as well as with expression of tumor suppressor FHIT, independent of histological grade. In addition, tumor promoter LRIG2 expression correlated negatively with expression of tumor suppressor retinoblastoma protein and positively with IL-10. The latter correlation did not however remain after adjustment for CIN grade. p53 and p16 expressions correlated positively with LRIG1 expression in univariate analyses, but significance did not hold after adjustment for CIN grade. Conclusion. LRIG1 and LRIG2 expressions were seen in precancerous cervical epithelium and found to increase with increasing grade. There was an association between expression of these glycoproteins and FHIT tumor suppressor protein, independently of histological grade.
|
|
