SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Utökad sökning

Träfflista för sökning "L773:0362 2436 OR L773:1528 1159 ;hsvcat:5"

Sökning: L773:0362 2436 OR L773:1528 1159 > Samhällsvetenskap

  • Resultat 1-7 av 7
Sortera/gruppera träfflistan
   
NumreringReferensOmslagsbildHitta
1.
  • Linton, Steven J., et al. (författare)
  • Development of a short form of the Örebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire
  • 2011
  • Ingår i: Spine. - : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. - 0362-2436 .- 1528-1159. ; 36:22, s. 1891-1895
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Study Design: A longitudinal design where the questionnaire was completed at a pre test and predictive ability evaluated with a one-year follow-up. A second sample was employed to provide a replication.Objective: The aim of the study was to validate a short form of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain ScreeningQuestionnaire: Summary of Background Data. Several studies demonstrate the research and clinical utility of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire. Calls have been made for a shorter form that requires less time in administering.Methods: The short version was constructed by taking two items from each of the five factors shown to have predictive power. It was then tested against the long form in two samples of people with musculoskeletal pain where one reflects an occupational health care population (N = 324) and the other a primary care population (N = 183) thus providing a built-in replication. All participants completed the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire and were then followed over the course of a year to evaluate disability as measured by sick leave.Results: The correlation between the short and long forms was.91. The ROC curve was nearly identical for the long and short versions of the questionnaire (e.g. primary care sample:.84 versus.81; occupational sample:.72 versus.70). Of those who developed disability, a cutoff of 50 on the short version identified 85% in the occupational and 83% in the primary care samples which was nearly as good as the full version (92% respectively 83%).Conclusions: The short form of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire is appropriate for clinical and research purposes since it is nearly as accurate as the longer version.
  •  
2.
  •  
3.
  • Magnusson, Marianne L., et al. (författare)
  • Motor Control Learning in Chronic Low Back Pain
  • 2008
  • Ingår i: Spine. - Hagerstown, Md. : Harper & Row. - 0362-2436 .- 1528-1159. ; 33:16, s. E532-E538
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Study design: A randomized prospective cohort study of participants with chronic low back pain, seeking physical therapy, with follow-up at weeks 6 and 28. Effects of conventional physiotherapy and physiotherapy with the addition of postural biofeedback were compared.Objective: To evaluate the benefits of postural biofeedback in chronic low back pain participants.Summary of background data: Biofeedback using electromyographic signals has been used in chronic low back pain with mixed results. Postural feedback had not been previously used.Methods: Demographic and psychological baseline data along with range of motion were analyzed from a sample of 47 chronic participants with low back pain randomized into conventional physiotherapy with or without the addition of postural biofeedback.Results: After 6 months, there were 21 dropouts. The participants with biofeedback had markedly improved status in visual analog pain scales, short form FS36, and range of motion.Conclusion: The study strongly suggests that postural feedback is a useful adjunct to conventional physiotherapy of chronic low back pain participants.
  •  
4.
  • Robinson, Yohan, 1977-, et al. (författare)
  • Surgical Stabilization Improves Survival of Spinal Fractures Related to Ankylosing Spondylitis
  • 2015
  • Ingår i: Spine. - 0362-2436 .- 1528-1159. ; 40:21, s. 1697-1702
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Study Design. National registry cohort study. Objective. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of surgical stabilization on survival of spinal fractures related to ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Summary of Background Data. Spinal fractures related to AS are associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Multiple studies suggest a beneficial effect of surgical stabilization in these patients. Methods. In the Swedish patient registry, all patients treated in an inpatient facility are registered with diagnosis and treatment codes. The Swedish mortality registry collects date and cause of death for all fatalities. Registry extracts of all patients with AS and spinal fractures including date of death and treatment were prepared and analyzed for epidemiological purposes. Results. Seventeen thousand two hundred ninety-seven individual patients with AS were admitted to treatment facilities in Sweden between 1987 and 2011. Nine hundred ninety patients with AS (age 66 +/- 14 years) had 1131 spinal fractures, of which 534 affected cervical, 352 thoracic, and 245 lumbar vertebrae. Thirteen percent had multiple levels of injuries during the observed period. Surgically treated patients had a greater survival than those treated nonsurgically [hazard ratio (HR) 0.79, P = 0.029]. Spinal cord injury was the major factor contributing to mortality in this cohort (HR 1.55, P< 0.001). The proportion of surgically treated spinal fractures increased linearly during the last decades (r = 0.92, P< 0.001) and was 64% throughout the observed years. Conclusions. Spinal cord injury threatened the survival of patients with spinal fractures related to AS. Even though surgical treatment is associated with a considerable complication rate, it improved the survival of spinal fractures related to AS.
  •  
5.
  • Siegmund, Gunter P., et al. (författare)
  • Letter to the editor
  • 2019
  • Ingår i: Spine. - Malmö : Malmö universitet. - 1528-1159 .- 0362-2436. ; 44:2, s. E133-E133:1, s. i-i
  • Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
  •  
6.
  •  
7.
  • Ahlqwist, Anna, et al. (författare)
  • Physical therapy treatment of back complaints on children and adolescents.
  • 2008
  • Ingår i: Spine. - 1528-1159. ; 33:20
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • STUDY DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial was performed. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate how 2 different treatment options affect perception of health, pain, and physical functioning over time among children and adolescents with low back pain (LBP). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: LBP among children and adolescents has increased. The literature shows that children with LBP also suffer from this condition as adults. Thus, it is important to prevent and treat LBP in children and adolescents. METHODS: Forty-five children and adolescents were consecutively randomized into one of 2 treatment groups and were studied for 12 weeks. Group 1 was given individualized physical therapy and exercise and a standardized self-training program and back education. Group 2 was given self-training program and back education but no individualized therapy. The children and adolescents were tested before and after the treatment period. Child Health Questionnaire Child Form 87, Roland & Morris Disability Questionnaire, Painometer, Back Saver Sit and Reach, and test of trunk muscle endurance were used to evaluate the interventions. RESULTS: Both groups improved statistically significant in most parameters over time. On comparison between the groups the physical function measured by Roland & Morris Disability Questionnaire and the duration of pain measured by Painometer improved statistically significant in Group 1. CONCLUSION: An individual assessment by a knowledgeable physiotherapist and an active treatment model improve how children and adolescents experience their back problems with respect to health and physical function, pain, strength, and mobility, regardless of whether treatment consists of a home exercise program with follow-up or home exercise combined with exercise and treatment supervised by a physiotherapist.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Resultat 1-7 av 7

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy