| 1. |
- Birgisson, H, et al.
(författare)
-
Improved survival in cancer of the colon and rectum in Sweden.
- 2005
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Surgical Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0748-7983 .- 1532-2157. ; 31:8, s. 845-53
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- AIMS: To analyse time-trends in survival of patients with colon and rectal cancer in Sweden.PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data including all patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum between 1960 and 1999, from the Swedish Cancer Registry, were analysed. The observed and relative survival rates were calculated according to the Hakulinen cohort method.RESULTS: Five-year relative survival rate for cancer of the colon improved significantly from 39.6% in 1960--1964 to 57.2% in 1995--1999 and for rectal cancer from 36.1 to 57.6%, respectively. Corresponding observed survival improved from 31.2 to 44.3% for colon cancer and from 28.4 to 45.4% for rectal cancer. The largest improvement of survival were seen during the later part of the period observed.CONCLUSION: The survival of patients with colon and rectal cancer in Sweden continues to improve, especially in rectal cancer, which now has a 5-year observed and relative survival rate comparable to that for colon cancer. The survival improvement in rectal cancer is probably a result of the implementation of total mesorectal excision and pre-operative radiotherapy.
|
|
| 2. |
- Blind, Niillas, et al.
(författare)
-
The impact of a patient's social network on emergency surgery for colon cancer
- 2023
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Surgical Oncology. - : Elsevier. - 0748-7983 .- 1532-2157. ; 49:2, s. 440-444
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate if patients with a weak social network and colon cancer are more likely to be operated as an emergency than those with a strong social network.METHODS: Data from patients living in Västerbotten County, Sweden, who underwent colon cancer surgery between 2007 and 2020 were extracted from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry (SCRCR). Patients identified were matched against the Västerbotten Intervention Program (VIP) and the longitudinal study Monitoring of Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease (MONICA). These two databases include a survey that includes questions regarding quality and size of the patient's social network. Multivariable logistic regression was used for analysis.RESULTS: Six items from the questions on social network, and the composite variables availability of social integration (AVSI) and availability of attachment (AVAT) were analysed. Data from 801 patients were analysed. The odds ratio for emergency surgery was significantly higher for divorced patients (OR 2.01 (CI 1.03-3.91)) and for male gender (OR 1.51 (CI 1.02-2.24)). A higher OR was seen amongst those with no-one to share feelings with (OR 1.57 (CI 0.82-3.03)) or to comfort them (OR1.33 (CI 0.78-2.28)). Quantitative aspects of social life such as the number of people greater than 10 that feel relaxed at the patient's home, showed a lower OR (OR 0.71(CI 0.35-1.43)).CONCLUSION: The impact of social network on the risk for emergency surgery for colon cancer is limited. Divorced status and male gender were associated with an increased risk for emergency surgery.
|
|
| 3. |
- Gkekas, Ioannis, et al.
(författare)
-
Deficient mismatch repair as a prognostic marker in stage II colon cancer patients
- 2019
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Surgical Oncology. - : Elsevier. - 0748-7983 .- 1532-2157. ; 45:10, s. 1854-1861
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: A number of reports have evaluated the relationship between deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) and colorectal cancer prognosis. Unfortunately, the exact prognostic role of dMMR has not been clearly established due to contradictory results. This study aims to determine the prognostic impact of dMRR in stage II colon cancer patients only. The appropriate identification of high-risk stage II colon cancers is of paramount importance in the selection of patients who may benefit from adjuvant treatment after surgery.METHODS: Four hundred and fifty-two patients with curative resection of stage II colon cancer were included. Hospital records were used as data source, providing clinical, surgical, pathology, oncology and follow-up information for statistical analysis focusing on overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP). Mismatch repair status was determined by immunohistochemistry. Patient survival was followed-up for a mean of 77·35 months.RESULTS: dMMR was detected in 93 of 452 patients (20·6%). No impact on overall survival (Log-Rank, p = 0·583, 95% CI 0·76-1·67). However, the hazard ratio 0·50 for TTP was highly significant (Log-Rank, p = 0·012, 95% CI 0·28-0·87) in patients with dMMR compared with those with mismatch repair proficient tumours (pMMR).CONCLUSIONS: Patients with dMMR tumours have a lower risk for recurrence compared to those with pMMR tumours, but this finding did not correlate to better overall survival.
|
|
| 4. |
- Gunnarsson, Ulf
(författare)
-
Quality assurance in surgical oncology : Colorectal cancer as an example
- 2003
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Surgical Oncology. - : Elsevier. - 0748-7983 .- 1532-2157. ; 29:1, s. 89-94
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Quality assurance in surgical oncology is a field of growing importance. National, regional and local systems have been built up in many countries. Often the quality assurance projects are linked to different registers. The advantage of such a link is the possibility of obtaining population-based data from unselected health care institutions. Few discussions of results from such projects have been published. Quality assurance of colorectal cancer surgery implies the development and use of systems for improvement all the way from detection of the cancer to the outcome as survival and patient satisfaction. To achieve this we must know what methods are being used and the outcome of our treatments. Designing processes for improvement necessitates careful planning, including decisions about end-points. Some crucial issues are discussed step-by-step in the present paper. In addition to auditing and providing collegial feedback, quality assurance is a tool for closing the gap between clinical practice and evidence based medicine and for creating new evidences as well as monitoring the introduction of new techniques and their effects.
|
|
| 5. |
- Jestin, P, et al.
(författare)
-
Elective surgery for colorectal cancer in a defined Swedish population.
- 2004
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Surgical Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0748-7983 .- 1532-2157. ; 30:1, s. 26-33
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- AIMS: The aim of this study was to describe variability in compliance to clinical guidelines in colorectal cancer surgery related to hospital structure.METHODS: All patients registered in the databases of the Regional Oncologic Centre, operated upon electively for colon cancer between the start of the register in 1997 until 2000 (n=1771) and for rectal cancer between the start of the register in 1995 until 2000 (n=1841) were selected for analysis.RESULTS: There was no difference in 5-year survival rate between colon and rectal cancer (mean follow-up 2.6 and 3.0 years, respectively; p=0.22). There was a significant difference in frequency of preoperative liver scan depending on hospital category with an increase in colon cancer from 39 to 46% (p=0.02) and in rectal cancer from 42 to 64% (p<0.001). For colon cancer there was no difference, according to hospital category, in quotient sigmoid and high anterior resection to left-sided resection. Furthermore, high anterior resection was more common at university and general district hospitals (8%) compared with district hospitals (4%) (p=0.01). Sphincter-saving surgery was more common at university hospitals and district general hospitals than at district hospitals (low anterior/abdomino-perineal resection quotients 2.3, 2.4 and 1.6, respectively; p<0.001).CONCLUSIONS: Population-based audit forms an appropriate and valuable basis for quality assurance projects. In addition to describing compliance to guidelines and pointing to process steps that can be improved, such investigations may also indicate changes due to scientific development. Linked to case-costing data, such results may form an important basis for decisions about modifications in health care.
|
|
| 6. |
- Saraste, D, et al.
(författare)
-
Local excision in early rectal cancer-outcome worse than expected : a population based study
- 2013
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Surgical Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0748-7983 .- 1532-2157. ; 39:6, s. 634-639
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Considering the morbidity and mortality after abdominal surgery for rectal cancer, our aim was to determine whether local excision in Stage I rectal cancer provides long-term survival equivalent to TME surgery, particularly in elderly patients.METHODS: Data on 3694 consecutive patients with Stage I rectal cancer operated 1995-2006, were collected from the Swedish Rectal Cancer Register, a population-based, prospectively sampled data-base. Risk factors for death within 5 years after surgery, local recurrence rates, cumulative relative and overall survival rates were calculated for patients ≥ and <80 years-of-age. ASA grading related to surgical technique was analysed in a separate sample.RESULTS: Local excision (LE) was associated with an increased mortality risk both ≥80 (HR 1.55) and <80 years-of-age (HR 1.45). After LE the 5-year local recurrence rate was 11.2% and the total and relative cumulative 5-year survival was 0.62 and 0.81 respectively. Hartmann's procedure (HA) showed an increased mortality risk only in younger patients (HR 2.15). The overall local recurrence rate was 7.2% with HA. Male gender (HR 1.70) and age (HR 1.06) were associated with a significantly increased mortality risk in all age groups. The ASA-grade was higher among patients operated with LE compared to Anterior Resection/Abdominoperineal resection.CONCLUSION: Local excision has a poor outcome in the elderly. A negative selection bias towards old age and high co-morbidity could explain this. Hartmann's procedure has a high risk for mortality and local recurrence in younger patients.
|
|
