| 1. |
- Larson, Mia, et al.
(författare)
-
Relational interaction processes in project networks : The consent and negotiation perspectives
- 2007
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian Journal of Management. - : Elsevier. - 0956-5221 .- 1873-3387. ; 23:3, s. 327-352
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This article seeks to describe and understand relational interaction processes in project networks, and suggests that there is a connection between the characteristics of a project network and the type of interactions within it. We suggest that time, legitimacy and power structure determine the type of interaction processes that occur. Four case studies of service-producing project networks show that relational interaction processes tend to change over time-shifting between the dimensions of consent and negotiation. Project networks seeking to acquire legitimacy are characterised by consent-based interaction processes such as mapping by rhetoric and maintaining an element of vagueness. Legitimate project networks are, on the other hand, characterised by negotiation-based interaction processes such as meetings between the representatives of different interests. Thus, actors in different types of project network adopt different interaction strategies in managing project networks with a view to creating legitimacy or mutual commitment. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
|
|
| 2. |
- Arman, Rebecka, 1976, et al.
(författare)
-
The hierarchization of competing logics in psychiatric care in Sweden
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian Journal of Management. - : Elsevier BV. - 0956-5221. ; 30:3, s. 282-291
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In many healthcare organizations, the managerial institutional logic co-exists and competes with the professional institutional logic in the day-to-day work of managers and professionals. In its examination of the relationship between these two institutional logics at three psychiatric care units for children and adolescents, this study contributes to our understanding of the theoretical concepts and their practical implications for the actor-to-actor approaches to competing institutional healthcare logics. Many earlier studies use theoretical concepts to describe this co-existence as a relatively equal relationship between the competing logics. This study, using data from interviews, observations and shadowing, reveals the existence of a process we label “hierarchization”. In this process, the managerial logic dominates the professional logic although the latter logic still co-exists and competes, albeit in a subordinate role. The study also reveals that quantification of primarily patient throughput is used to legitimize the dominant managerial logic. Such use of quantification supports the meta-trend of placing trust in numbers.
|
|
| 3. |
- Liff, Roy, 1951, et al.
(författare)
-
The problem-avoiding multi professional team - On the need to overcome protective routines
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian Journal of Management. - : Elsevier BV. - 0956-5221. ; 31:2, s. 266-278
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This study examines how compartmentalization in multi-professional teams in healthcare, inhibits productive interaction and the role of team leadership in the institutionalization of professional identity protective routines used in these units as they affect teamwork. The main finding is that protective routines that create compartmentalization reduce the threat to professional identity, but also influence potential affording situations negatively. The positive effect of protective routines in reducing the professional identity threat then is neutralized by this negative effect on affording situations. This explains why the effect of multi-professionalism on creative and effective teamwork may still be minimal despite the low level of professional identity threat. The paper adds to previous research on how team leadership can enhance the performance of multi-professional teams. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
|
|
