| 1. |
- Hedman, Erik, et al.
(författare)
-
A 5-year follow-up of internet-based cognitive behavior therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder
- 2011
-
Ingår i: Journal of Medical Internet Research. - : JMIR Publications Inc.. - 1438-8871. ; 13:2
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Internet-basedcognitive behavior therapy (CBT) has been shown to be a promising method todisseminate cognitive behavior therapy for social anxiety disorder (SAD).Several trials have demonstrated that Internet-based CBT can be effective forSAD in the shorter term. However, the long-term effects of Internet-based CBTfor SAD are less well known. Objective: Our objectivewas to investigate the effect of Internet-based CBT for SAD 5 years aftercompleted treatment. Method: We conducted a 5-yearfollow-up study of 80 persons with SAD who had undergone Internet-based CBT.The assessment comprised a diagnostic interview and self-report questionnaires.The main outcome measure was the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale-Self-Report (LSAS-SR). Additional measures of social anxiety were the Social InteractionAnxiety Scale (SIAS) and the Social Phobia Scale (SPS). Attrition rates werelow: 89% (71/80) of the participants completed the diagnostic interview and 80% (64/80) responded to the questionnaires. Results: Mixed-effect models analysisshowed a significant effect of time on the three social anxiety measures,LSAS-SR, SIAS, and SPS (F3,98-102 = 16.05 -29.20, P < .001)indicating improvement. From baseline to 5-year follow-up, participants’ meanscores on the LSAS-SR were reduced from 71.3 (95% confidence interval [CI]66.1-76.5) to 40.3 (95% CI 35.2 - 45.3). The effect sizes of the LSAS-SR were large (Cohen’s d range 1.30 - 1.40, 95% CI 0.77 - 1.90). Improvementsgained at the 1-year follow-up were sustained 5 years after completedtreatment. Conclusions: Internet-basedCBT for SAD is a treatment that can result in large and enduring effects. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.govNCT01145690; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01145690 (Archived byWebCite athttp://www.webcitation.org/5ygRxDLfK)
|
|
| 2. |
- Hedman, Erik, et al.
(författare)
-
Telephone vs. Internet-administration of self-report measures of social anxiety, depressive symptoms, and insomnia : psychometric validation of a method to reduce the impact of missing data
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Journal of Medical Internet Research. - : JMIR. - 1438-8871. ; 15:10, s. 1-8
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Internet-administered self-report measures of social anxiety, depressive symptoms, and sleep difficulties are widely used in clinical trials and in clinical routine care, but data loss is a common problem that could render skewed estimates of symptom levels and treatment effects. One way of reducing the negative impact of missing data could be to use telephone administration of self-report measures as a means to complete the data missing from the online data collection.Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the convergence of telephone and Internet administration of self-report measures of social anxiety, depressive symptoms, and sleep difficulties.Methods: The Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale-Self-Report (LSAS-SR), Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale-Self-Rated (MADRS-S), and the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) were administered over the telephone and via the Internet to a clinical sample (N=82) of psychiatric patients at a clinic specializing in Internet-delivered treatment. Shortened versions of the LSAS-SR and the ISI were used when administered via telephone.Results: As predicted, the results showed that the estimates produced by the two administration formats were highly correlated (r=.82-.91; P<.001) and internal consistencies were high in both administration formats (telephone: Cronbach alpha=.76-.86 and Internet: Cronbach alpha=.79-.93). The correlation coefficients were similar across questionnaires and the shorter versions of the questionnaires used in the telephone administration of the LSAS-SR and ISI performed in general equally well compared to when the full scale was used, as was the case with the MADRS-S.Conclusions: Telephone administration of self-report questionnaires is a valid method that can be used to reduce data loss in routine psychiatric practice as well as in clinical trials, thereby contributing to more accurate symptom estimates.
|
|
| 3. |
- Lindsäter, Elfin, et al.
(författare)
-
Cost-Effectiveness of Therapist-Guided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Stress-Related Disorders : Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Journal of Medical Internet Research. - : JMIR Publications Inc.. - 1438-8871. ; 21:9
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Stress-related disorders are associated with significant suffering, functional impairment, and high societal costs. Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) is a promising treatment for stress-related disorders but has so far not been subjected to health economic evaluation. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of ICBT for patients with stress-related disorders in the form of adjustment disorder (AD) or exhaustion disorder (ED). We hypothesized that ICBT, compared with a waitlist control (WLC) group, would generate improvements at low net costs, thereby making it cost-effective.Methods: Health economic data were obtained in tandem with a randomized controlled trial of a 12-week ICBT in which patients (N=100) were randomized to an ICBT (n=50) or a WLC (n=50) group. Health outcomes and costs were surveyed pre-and posttreatment. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) based on remission rates and incremental cost-utility ratios (ICURs) based on health-related quality of life. Bootstrap sampling was used to assess the uncertainty of our results.Results: The ICER indicated that the most likely scenario was that ICBT led to higher remission rates compared with the WLC and was associated with slightly larger reductions in costs from pre- to posttreatment. ICBT had a 60% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness to pay (WTP) of US $0 and a 96% probability of being cost-effective at a WTP of US $1000. The ICUR indicated that ICBT also led to improvements in quality of life at no net societal cost. Sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of our results.Conclusions: The results suggest that ICBT is a cost-effective treatment for patients suffering from AD or ED. Compared with no treatment, ICBT for these patients yields large effects at no or minimal societal net costs.
|
|
| 4. |
- Persson Asplund, Robert, 1977-, et al.
(författare)
-
Work-Focused Versus Generic Internet-Based Interventions for Employees With Stress-Related Disorders : Randomized Controlled Trial
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Journal of Medical Internet Research. - : JMIR Publications. - 1438-8871. ; 25
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: In recent decades, stress-related disorders have received more attention, with an increasing prevalence, especially within the working population. The internet provides new options for broad dissemination, and a growing body of evidence suggests that web-based interventions for stress might be effective. However, few studies have examined the efficacy of interventions in clinical samples and work-related outcomes.Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of an internet-based cognitive behavioral intervention for stress-related disorders integrating work-related aspects (work-focused and internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy [W-iCBT]), compared with a generic internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT) group and a waitlist control (WLC) group.Methods: In this trial, 182 employees, mainly employed in the health care, IT, or educational sector, who fulfilled the criteria for a stress-related disorder, were randomized to a 10-week W-iCBT (n=61, 33.5%), generic iCBT (n=61, 33.5%), or WLC (n=60, 33%). Self-rated questionnaires on perceived stress, burnout, exhaustion, and other mental health– and work-related outcomes were administered before and after the treatment and at 6- and 12-month follow-ups.Results: Compared with the WLC group, participants of the W-iCBT and iCBT groups showed an equal and significant reduction in the primary outcome (Shirom-Melamed Burnout Questionnaire [SMBQ]) from pretreatment to posttreatment assessment (Cohen d=1.00 and 0.83, respectively) and at the 6-month follow-up (Cohen d=0.74 and 0.74, respectively). Significant moderate-to-large effect sizes were also found in the secondary health- and work-related outcomes. The W-iCBT was the only group that exhibited significant effects on work ability and short-term sickness absence. Short-term sickness absence was 445 days lower than the WLC group and 324 days lower than the iCBT intervention group. However, no significant differences were found in terms of work experience or long-term sick leave.Conclusions: The work-focused and generic iCBT interventions proved to be superior compared with the control condition in reducing chronic stress and several other mental health–related symptoms. Interestingly, effects on work ability and short-term sickness absence were only seen between the W-iCBT intervention and the WLC groups. These preliminary results are promising, indicating that treatments that include work aspects may have the potential to accelerate recovery and reduce short-term sickness absence because of stress-related disorders.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05240495
|
|
