| 1. |
- Aktaa, Suleman, et al.
(författare)
-
European Society of Cardiology Quality Indicators for the care and outcomes of cardiac pacing : developed by the Working Group for Cardiac Pacing Quality Indicators in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Europace. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1099-5129 .- 1532-2092. ; 24:1, s. 165-172
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- AIMS: To develop a suite of quality indicators (QIs) for the evaluation of the care and outcomes for adults undergoing cardiac pacing.METHODS AND RESULTS: Under the auspice of the Clinical Practice Guideline Quality Indicator Committee of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), the Working Group for cardiac pacing QIs was formed. The Group comprised Task Force members of the 2021 ESC Clinical Practice Guidelines on Cardiac Pacing and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, members of the European Heart Rhythm Association, international cardiac device experts, and patient representatives. We followed the ESC methodology for QI development, which involved (i) the identification of the key domains of care by constructing a conceptual framework of the management of patients receiving cardiac pacing, (ii) the development of candidate QIs by conducting a systematic review of the literature, (iii) the selection of the final set of QIs using a modified-Delphi method, and (iv) the evaluation of the feasibility of the developed QIs. Four domains of care were identified: (i) structural framework, (ii) patient assessment, (iii) pacing strategy, and (iv) clinical outcomes. In total, seven main and four secondary QIs were selected across these domains and were embedded within the 2021 ESC Guidelines on Cardiac Pacing and Cardiac Resynchronization therapy.CONCLUSION: By way of a standardized process, 11 QIs for cardiac pacing were developed. These indicators may be used to quantify adherence to guideline-recommended clinical practice and have the potential to improve the care and outcomes of patients receiving cardiac pacemakers.
|
|
| 2. |
- Braunschweig, Frieder, et al.
(författare)
-
Transient repolarization instability following the initiation of cardiac resynchronization therapy.
- 2011
-
Ingår i: EP Europace. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1532-2092. ; 13:9, s. 1327-1334
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aims Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may cause changes in ventricular repolarization (VR), particularly in the initial phase of treatment. This study investigated the effect of CRT cessation and re-initiation on parameters of VR duration and heterogeneity at different paced heart rates. Methods Cardiac resynchronization therapy was inactivated for 2 weeks in 16 treatment responders to CRT. QT and JT intervals were measured on the surface electrocardiogram at 60, 70, and 80 bpm (randomized order) and vectorcardiography (VCG) was performed with CRT ‘on’ (day 0), ‘off’ (day 0, 1, 7, and 14) and after CRT re-initiation (day 14, 15, 16, and 21). On day 0 (‘on’) and 14 (‘off’) echocardiography, the 6 min walking distance and brain natriuretic peptide were assessed. Results The QT interval at baseline (CRT ‘on’), measured at 60, 70, and 80 bpm, was 482 ± 31, 468 ± 37, and 457 ± 39 ms, respectively, and decreased by 5, 5, and 6% during the first week following CRT cessation (all P< 0.05). Immediately after re-initiation on day 14, it increased again by 20 ± 18 (4%; P< 0.05), 34 ± 39 (8%; P< 0.01), and 16 ± 38 ms (4%, ns) followed by a gradual decrease towards previous ‘off’ levels. Similar changes were observed for the JT interval. Ventricular repolarization duration was significantly shortened by increasing the paced heart rate from 60 to 70 and 80 bpm. Vectorcardiography parameters reflecting VR gradients (ST-vector magnitude, Tarea, and Tavplan) increased significantly (by 31, 45, and 71%) after CRT cessation. A similar but non-significant pattern was observed after CRT re-initiation. Conclusion The increase in repolarization duration and gradients observed after CRT initiation suggests a transient state of VR instability that can be attenuated by programming of higher paced heart rates during the initial phase of treatment.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Dickstein, Kenneth, et al.
(författare)
-
European Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Survey II : rationale and design
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Europace. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1099-5129 .- 1532-2092. ; 17:1, s. 137-141
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) Survey II is a 6 months snapshot survey initiated by two ESC Associations, the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Failure Association, which is designed to describe clinical practice regarding implantation of CRT devices in a broad sample of hospitals in 47 ESC member countries. The large volume of clinical and demographic data collected should reflect current patient selection, implantation, and follow-up practice and provide information relevant for assessing healthcare resource utilization in connection with CRT. The findings of this survey should permit representative benchmarking both nationally and internationally across Europe.
|
|
| 6. |
- Linde, Cecilia, et al.
(författare)
-
Gender, underutilization of cardiac resynchronization therapy, and prognostic impact of QRS prolongation and left bundle branch block in heart failure.
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Europace. - : Oxford University Press. - 1099-5129 .- 1532-2092. ; 17:3, s. 424-431
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- AIMS: It has been suggested that cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is less utilized, dyssynchrony occurs at narrower QRS, and CRT is more beneficial in women compared with men. We tested the hypotheses that (i) CRT is more underutilized and (ii) QRS prolongation and left bundle branch block (LBBB) are more harmful in women.METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 14 713 patients (28% women) with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40% in the Swedish Heart Failure Registry. In women vs. men, CRT was present in 4 vs. 7% (P < 0.001) and was absent but with indication in 30 vs. 31% (P = 0.826). Next, among 13 782 patients (28% women) without CRT, 9% of women and 17% of men had non-specific intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD) and 27% of women and 24% of men had LBBB. One-year survival with narrow QRS was 85% in women and 88% in men, with IVCD 74 and 78%, and with LBBB 84 and 82%, respectively. Compared with narrow QRS, IVCD had a multivariable hazard ratio of 1.24 (95% CI 1.05-1.46, P = 0.011) in women and 1.30 (95% CI 1.19-1.42, P < 0.001) in men, and LBBB 1.03 (95% CI 0.91-1.16, P = 0.651) in women and 1.16 (95% CI 1.07-1.26, P < 0.001) in men, P for interaction between gender and QRS morphology, 0.241.CONCLUSIONS: While the proportion with CRT was lower in women, CRT was equally underutilized in both genders. QRS prolongation with or without LBBB was not more harmful in women than in men. Efforts to improve CRT implementation should be directed equally towards women and men.
|
|
| 7. |
- Mullens, Wilfried, et al.
(författare)
-
Optimized implementation of cardiac resynchronization therapy: a call for action for referral and optimization of care : A joint position statement from the Heart Failure Association (HFA), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) of the European Society of Cardiology
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Europace. - : OXFORD UNIV PRESS. - 1099-5129 .- 1532-2092. ; 23:8, s. 1324-1342
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is one of the most effective therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and leads to improved quality of life, reductions in heart failure hospitalization rates and all-cause mortality. Nevertheless, up to two-thirds of eligible patients are not referred for CRT. Furthermore, post-implantation follow-up is often fragmented and suboptimal, hampering the potential maximal treatment effect. This joint position statement from three European Society of Cardiology Associations, Heart Failure Association (HFA), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI), focuses on optimized implementation of CRT. We offer theoretical and practical strategies to achieve more comprehensive CRT referral and post-procedural care by focusing on four actionable domains: (i) overcoming CRT under-utilization, (ii) better understanding of pre-implant characteristics, (iii) abandoning the term non-response and replacing this by the concept of disease modification, and (iv) implementing a dedicated post-implant CRT care pathway.
|
|
| 8. |
- Normand, Camilla, et al.
(författare)
-
Adherence to ESC cardiac resynchronization therapy guidelines : findings from the ESC CRT Survey II
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Europace. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1099-5129 .- 1532-2092. ; 22:6, s. 932-938
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure (HF) and electrical dyssynchrony. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations indicating optimal patient selection for CRT implantation in both the 2013 European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and the 2016 Heart Failure Association (HFA) Guidelines. We assessed the adherence to guidelines and identified factors associated with guideline adherence.METHODS AND RESULTS: In 2016, the HFA and EHRA conducted the CRT Survey II in 42 ESC countries. The data collected were sufficient to evaluate adherence to guidelines in 8021 patients. Of these, 67% had a Class I guideline indication for CRT implantation, which was significantly correlated with female gender (1.70, P < 0.0001), age <75 years (1.55, P < 0.0001), non-ischaemic HF aetiology (1.22, P < 0.0001), and elective admission (1.87, P < 0.0001). A further 26% of implants had a Class IIa indication, 5% IIb and only 2% a contraindication to CRT-a Class III indication. Patients implanted under Level IIa indications were much more likely to have more comorbidities than patients implanted under Level I indications. However, there were large variations in guideline adherence between ESC countries.CONCLUSION: Implanters in ESC member states demonstrate a high degree of adherence to ESC guidelines with 98% of implants having a documented Class I, IIa or IIb indication. Cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation without a Class I indication was more likely in men, patients age ≥75 years, with HF of ischaemic origin and in patients admitted to hospital acutely.
|
|
| 9. |
- Normand, Camilla, et al.
(författare)
-
Cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator : what determines the choice?-findings from the ESC CRT Survey II
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Europace. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1099-5129 .- 1532-2092. ; 21:6, s. 918-927
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- AIMS: The decision to implant a cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker (CRT-P) or a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) may be challenging. There are no clear guideline recommendations as no randomized study of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been designed to compare the effects of CRT-P with those of CRT-D on patients' outcomes. In the CRT Survey II, we studied patient and implantation centre characteristics associated with the choice of CRT-P vs. CRT-D.METHODS AND RESULTS: Clinical practice data from 10 692 patients undergoing CRT implantation of whom 7467 (70%) patients received a CRT-D and 3225 (30%) received a CRT-P across 42 ESC countries were collected and analysed between October 2015 and January 2017. Factors favouring the selection of CRT-P implantation included age >75 years, female gender, non-ischaemic heart failure (HF) aetiology, New York Heart Association functional Class III/IV symptoms, left ventricular ejection fraction >25%, atrial fibrillation, atrioventricular (AV) block II/III, and implantation in a university hospital.CONCLUSION: In a large cohort from the CRT Survey II, we found that patients allocated to receive CRT-P exhibited particular phenotypes with more symptomatic HF, more frequent comorbidities, advanced age, female gender, non-ischaemic HF aetiology, atrial fibrillation, and evidence of AV block. There were substantial differences in the proportion of patients allocated to receive CRT-P vs. CRT-D between countries.
|
|
| 10. |
- Schrage, Benedikt, et al.
(författare)
-
Cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without defibrillator in patients with heart failure
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Europace. - : Oxford University Press. - 1099-5129 .- 1532-2092. ; 24:1, s. 48-57
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aims Randomized data on the efficacy/safety of cardiac resynchronization therapy with vs. without defibrillator (CRT-D,-P) in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are scarce. We aimed to evaluate survival associated with use of CRT-D vs. CRT-P in a contemporary cohort with HFrEF. Methods and results Patients from Swedish HF Registry treated with CRT-D/CRT-P and fulfilling criteria for primary prevention defibrillator use were included. Logistic regression was used to evaluate predictors of CRT-D non-use. All-cause mortality was compared in CRT-D vs. CRT-P by Cox regression in a 1 : 1 propensity-score-matched cohort. Of 1988 patients with CRT, 1108 (56%) had CRT-D and 880 (44%) CRT-P. Older age, higher ejection fraction (EF), female sex, and the lack of referral to HF nurse-led outpatient clinic were major determinants of CRT-D non-use. After matching, 645 CRT-D patients were compared with 645 with CRT-P. The CRT-D use was associated with lower 1- and 3-year all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR):0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI):0.58-0.98; HR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.68-0.99, respectively]. Results were consistent in all pre-specified subgroups except for CRT-D use being associated with lower 3-year mortality in patients with an EF < 30% but not in those with an EF >= 30% (HR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.59-0.89 and HR: 1.24, 95% CI: 0.83-1.85, respectively; P-interaction = 0.02). Conclusion In a contemporary HFrEF cohort, CRT-D was associated with lower mortality compared with CRT-P. The CRT-D use was less likely in older patients, females, and in patients not referred to HF nurse-led outpatient clinic. Our findings support the use of CRT-D vs. CRT-P in HFrEF, in particular with severely reduced EF.
|
|
