| 1. |
- Eggers, Kai M., 1962-, et al.
(författare)
-
Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries : The Importance of Achieving Secondary Prevention Targets
- 2018
-
Ingår i: American Journal of Medicine. - : Elsevier. - 0002-9343 .- 1555-7162. ; 131:5, s. 524-531
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Around 5-10% of all myocardial infarction patients have non-obstructive coronary arteries. Studies investigating the importance of follow-up and achievement of conventional secondary prevention targets in these patients are lacking.METHODS: In this analysis from the SWEDEHEART registry, we investigated 5830 myocardial infarction patients with non-obstructive coronary arteries (group 1) and 54,637 myocardial infarction patients with significant coronary artery disease (≥50% stenosis; group 2). Multivariable- and propensity score-adjusted statistics were used to assess the reduction in the one-year risk of major adverse events associated with prespecified secondary preventive measures: participation in follow-up at 6-10 weeks after the hospitalization; achievement of secondary prevention targets (blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in the target ranges, non-smoking, participation in exercise training).RESULTS: Patients in group 1 were less often followed up compared to patients in group 2 and less often achieved any of the secondary prevention targets. Participation in the 6-10 week follow-up was associated with a 3-20% risk reduction in group 1, similar as for group 2 according to interaction analysis. The improvement in outcome in group 1 was mainly mediated by achieving target range low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (24-32% risk reduction) and, to a smaller extent, by participation in exercise training (10-23% risk reduction).CONCLUSIONS: Selected secondary preventive measures are associated with prognostic benefit in myocardial infarction patients with non-obstructive coronary arteries, in particular achieving target range low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Our results indicate that these patients should receive similar follow-up as myocardial infarction patients with significant coronary stenoses.
|
|
| 2. |
- Nordenskjöld, Anna M., 1977-, et al.
(författare)
-
Reinfarction in patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) : coronary findings and prognosis
- 2019
-
Ingår i: American Journal of Medicine. - : Elsevier. - 0002-9343 .- 1555-7162. ; 132:3, s. 335-346
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Myocardial infarction (MI) with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is common. There are limited data on the mechanisms and prognosis for reinfarction in MINOCA patients.METHODS: In this observational study of MINOCA patients hospitalized in Sweden and registered in the SWEDEHEART registry between July 2003 and June 2013 and followed until December 2013 we identified 9,092 unique patients with MINOCA out of 199,163 MI admissions in total. The 570 (6.3%) MINOCA patients who were hospitalized due to a recurrent MI constituted the study group.RESULTS: The mean age was 69.1 years and 59.1% were women. The median time to readmission was 17 months. A total of 340 patients underwent a new coronary angiography and 180 (53%) had no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and 160 (47%) had obstructive CAD; 123 had one-vessel, 26 had two-vessel, 9 had three-vessel disease and two had left main together with one-vessel disease. Male gender, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, higher levels of creatinine and ST-elevation at presentation were more common in patients with MI with obstructive CAD than in patients with a recurrent MINOCA. Mortality during a median follow-up of 38 months was similar whether the reinfarction event was MINOCA or MI with obstructive CAD 13.9% vs. 11.9% (p=0.54).CONCLUSIONS: About half of patients with reinfarction after MINOCA who underwent coronary angiography had progression of coronary stenosis. Angiography should be strongly considered in patients with MI after MINOCA. Mortality associated with recurrent events was substantial, though there was no difference in mortality between those with or without significant CAD.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Simons, Malorie, et al.
(författare)
-
Celiac Disease and Increased Risk of Pneumococcal Infection : a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- 2017
-
Ingår i: American Journal of Medicine. - : Elsevier. - 0002-9343 .- 1555-7162. ; 131:1, s. 83-89
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Celiac disease has been associated with hyposplenism and multiple case reports link Celiac disease and pneumococcal infections; however, increased risk of pneumococcal infection in celiac disease has not been confirmed. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review to determine the risk of pneumococcal infections in celiac disease.METHODS: Relevant studies were identified using electronic bibliographic searches of PubMed, OVID Medline and EMBASE (1980 to February 2017) and reviewing abstracts from major conferences in gastroenterology. Using number of events in celiac patients and referent patients we calculated a summary relative risk of pneumococcal infections. All analyses were conducted in Comprehensive Meta-analysis software using random-effects assumptions.RESULTS: Of a total of 156 manuscripts, 3, representing three large databases including the Swedish National Inpatient Register; the Oxford Record Linkage Study; and the English National Hospital Episode Statistics, were included. Each compared patients with celiac disease and confirmed pneumococcal infection to a specific reference group: inpatients and/or the general population. Overall, the odds of pneumococcal infection were higher among hospitalized celiac patients compared to controls (odds ratio= 1.66; CI 95% 1.43, 1.92). There was no evidence of heterogeneity (Q[1] = 1.17, p = .56, I(2) = 0%).CONCLUSIONS: Celiac disease is associated with an increased risk of pneumococcal infection. Preventive pneumococcal vaccination should be considered for those with celiac disease, with special attention to those ages 15 to 64 who have not received the scheduled pneumococcal vaccination series as a child.
|
|
