| 1. |
- Mattsson, Eva, et al.
(författare)
-
Empirically derived psychosocial states among adolescents diagnosed with cancer during the acute and extended phase of survival
- 2009
-
Ingår i: Annals of Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0923-7534 .- 1569-8041. ; 20:10, s. 1722-1727
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Patients and methods: Participants completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and two subscales, Vitality and Mental Health, in the SF-36 4-8 weeks (T1) (n = 61), 6 (T2) (n = 57), 12 (T3) (n = 50), and 18 (T4) months (n = 48) after diagnosis. I-State as Object of Analysis was used to identify a finite set of states based on three dimensions. Cluster analysis was carried out using Ward's method. Results: Five states were obtained: psychosocial dysfunction (state A) and poor (B), incomplete (C), good (D), and excellent (E) psychosocial function. At T1, more adolescents than expected by chance were in states A (P < 0.05) and C (P < 0.01) and fewer in states D (P < 0.05) and E (P < 0.001). At T4, more adolescents than expected by chance were in state E (P < 0.001) and fewer in state C (P < 0.05). Female gender and being in late adolescence when diagnosed is related to worse psychosocial function. Conclusion: The findings provide support for subgroups of adolescents whose level of vitality, mental health, and anxiety differ during the acute and extended phase of survival of cancer. Clinical interventions tailored to the level of impairment as determined by the clusters may result in better psychosocial outcomes.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Skoogh, Johanna, 1975, et al.
(författare)
-
'A no means no'--measuring depression using a single-item question versus Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D).
- 2010
-
Ingår i: Annals of oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 1569-8041 .- 0923-7534. ; 21:9, s. 1905-1909
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Depression often develops undetected; to make treatment possible, a single-item screening question may be useful. Patients and methods: We attempted to compare the accuracy of the single-item question ‘Are you depressed?’ with the seven-item Depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D) among 1192 Swedish testicular cancer survivors. Results: We obtained information from 974 men (82%). Fifty-nine men (6%) answered ‘Yes’ to the question ‘Are you depressed?’ while 118 (12%) answered ‘I don't know’ and 794 (82%) answered ‘No’. Among the 794 men who answered ‘No’ to the question ‘Are you depressed?’, 790 (99.5%) were not considered as depressed according to HADS-D 11+. Of those answering ‘Yes’, 34% (20/59) were identified as depressed according to the same cut-off. Sensitivity of ‘Yes’ compared with HADS-D ≥11 was 61%, rising to 88% when ‘Yes’ and ‘I don't know’ were combined. Conclusion: In a population of men with a prevalence of depression similar to that of the normal population, almost none of those responding ‘No’ to the written question ‘Are you depressed?’ were depressed according to HADS-D ≥11. Adding the category ‘I don't know’ increases sensitivity in detecting depression.
|
|
