SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Utökad sökning

Träfflista för sökning "L773:1756 1833 ;lar1:(liu)"

Sökning: L773:1756 1833 > Linköpings universitet

  • Resultat 1-10 av 15
Sortera/gruppera träfflistan
   
NumreringReferensOmslagsbildHitta
1.
  •  
2.
  • Bobak, M, et al. (författare)
  • Life span and disability : a cross sectional comparison of Russian and Swedish community based data
  • 2004
  • Ingår i: The BMJ. - : BMJ. - 1756-1833. ; 329:7469, s. 767-770
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Objectives To compare levels of disability (in terms of physical function and self rated health) among middle aged and elderly people in Russia and Sweden, a country with high life expectancy. Design Cross sectional study. Setting General population of the Russian Federation and of two counties in southern Sweden. Participants Randomly selected men and women in Sweden (n = 9489) and Russia (n = 1599). Main outcome measures Official life table data, self rated health and physical functioning (subscale of the SF-36). Results The official life table data showed large differences in mortality-for example, 36% of Russian men aged 45-49 years would survive the next 25 years compared with 75% of Swedish men. The survey data showed, for both sexes, similar levels of self rated health and physical functioning in the two countries up to the age of about 45 years, but after that, the age related decline in both outcomes was much faster in Russia than in Sweden. By combining the national life tables with survey data on physical functioning we estimated that in the age group 45-49 years, 99% of Russian and 97% of Swedish men would be free of disability, of these, if these data were for a cohort, only 17% of Russians would be alive and free of disability 25 years later compared with 65% of Swedes. The difference in survival was similar in women. Conclusions Large differences exist in survival without disability between elderly Russians and Swedes. The short life span in Russia reflects high levels of ill health and disability and is associated with a rapid age related decline in physical functioning.
  •  
3.
  • Bower, Peter, et al. (författare)
  • Influence of initial severity of depression on effectiveness of low intensity interventions : meta-analysis of individual patient data
  • 2013
  • Ingår i: BMJ (Clinical Research Edition). - : BMJ Publishing Group: BMJ. - 0959-8138 .- 1756-1833. ; 346
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Objective To assess how initial severity of depression affects the benefit derived from low intensity interventions for depression.Design Meta-analysis of individual patient data from 16 datasets comparing low intensity interventions with usual care.Setting Primary care and community settings.Participants 2470 patients with depression.Interventions Low intensity interventions for depression (such as guided self help by means of written materials and limited professional support, and internet delivered interventions).Main outcome measures Depression outcomes (measured with the Beck Depression Inventory or Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale), and the effect of initial depression severity on the effects of low intensity interventions.Results Although patients were referred for low intensity interventions, many had moderate to severe depression at baseline. We found a significant interaction between baseline severity and treatment effect (coefficient −0.1 (95% CI −0.19 to −0.002)), suggesting that patients who are more severely depressed at baseline demonstrate larger treatment effects than those who are less severely depressed. However, the magnitude of the interaction (equivalent to an additional drop of around one point on the Beck Depression Inventory for a one standard deviation increase in initial severity) was small and may not be clinically significant.Conclusions The data suggest that patients with more severe depression at baseline show at least as much clinical benefit from low intensity interventions as less severely depressed patients and could usefully be offered these interventions as part of a stepped care model.
  •  
4.
  • Enander, Jesper, et al. (författare)
  • Therapist guided internet based cognitive behavioural therapy for body dysmorphic disorder: single blind randomised controlled trial
  • 2016
  • Ingår i: BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL. - : BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP. - 1756-1833. ; 352:i241
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • OBJECTIVES To evaluate the efficacy of therapist guided internet based cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) programme for body dysmorphic disorder (BDD-NET) compared with online supportive therapy. DESIGN A 12 week single blind parallel group randomised controlled trial. SETTING Academic medical centre. PARTICIPANTS 94 self referred adult outpatients with a diagnosis of body dysmorphic disorder and a modified Yale-Brown obsessive compulsive scale (BDD-YBOCS) score of >= 20. Concurrent psychotropic drug treatment was permitted if the dose had been stable for at least two months before enrolment and remained unchanged during the trial. INTERVENTIONS Participants received either BDD-NET (n=47) or supportive therapy (n=47) delivered via the internet for 12 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the BDD-YBOCS score after treatment and follow-up (three and six months from baseline) as evaluated by a masked assessor. Responder status was defined as a >= 30% reduction in symptoms on the scale. Secondary outcomes were measures of depression (MADRS-S), global functioning (GAF), clinical global improvement (CGI-I), and quality of life (EQ5D). The six month follow-up time and all outcomes other than BDD-YBOCS and MADRS-S at 3 months were not pre-specified in the registration at clinicaltrials.gov because of an administrative error but were included in the original trial protocol approved by the regional ethics committee before the start of the trial. RESULTS BDD-NET was superior to supportive therapy and was associated with significant improvements in severity of symptoms of body dysmorphic disorder (BDD-YBOCS group difference -7.1 points, 95% confidence interval -9.8 to -4.4), depression (MADRS-S group difference -4.5 points, -7.5 to -1.4), and other secondary measures. At follow-up, 56% of those receiving BDD-NET were classed as responders, compared with 13% receiving supportive therapy. The number needed to treat was 2.34 (1.71 to 4.35). Self reported satisfaction was high. CONCLUSIONS CBT can be delivered safely via the internet to patients with body dysmorphic disorder. BDD-NET has the potential to increase access to evidence based psychiatric care for this mental disorder, in line with NICE priority recommendations. It could be particularly useful in a stepped care approach, in which general practitioner or other mental health professionals can offer treatment to people with mild to moderate symptoms at low risk of suicide.
  •  
5.
  • Hakkarinen, Katja, et al. (författare)
  • Comments: Patient safety in developing countries: retrospective estimation of scale and nature of harm to patients in hospital (volume 344, article number e832, 2012)
  • 2012
  • Ingår i: The BMJ. - : BMJ. - 1756-1833. ; 344
  • Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
    • We commend Wilson and colleagues1 for their excellent study providing valuable evidence on the frequency and nature of adverse events in hospitals in transitional economies. Wilson and colleagues defined an adverse event as “an unintended injury that resulted in temporary or permanent disability or death (including increased length of stay or readmission) and that was associated with healthcare management rather than the underlying disease”, and found that 8.2% of the 15 548 reviewed records included at least one adverse event. The most common adverse events were therapeutic errors (34% of all adverse events), diagnostic events (19%), and operation-related events (18%). Drug-related adverse events represented only 4% of all adverse events, and were present in 0.3% of all records. Thus, drug-related events were markedly less frequent than in western studies,2 as the authors acknowledge. Wilson and colleagues imply that less frequent use of medicines in transitional economies may contribute to fewer drug-related events, and argue that improvements are needed in the diagnostic and therapeutic steps in the care of patients.
  •  
6.
  • Hetland, M. L., et al. (författare)
  • Active conventional treatment and three different biological treatments in early rheumatoid arthritis: phase IV investigator initiated, randomised, observer blinded clinical trial
  • 2020
  • Ingår i: Bmj-British Medical Journal. - : BMJ. - 1756-1833. ; 371
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • OBJECTIVE To evaluate and compare benefits and harms of three biological treatments with different modes of action versus active conventional treatment in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. DESIGN Investigator initiated, randomised, open label, blinded assessor, multiarm, phase IV study. SETTING Twenty nine rheumatology departments in Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland, the Netherlands, and Iceland between 2012 and 2018. PARTICIPANTS Patients aged 18 years and older with treatment naive rheumatoid arthritis, symptom duration less than 24 months, moderate to severe disease activity, and rheumatoid factor or anti-citrullinated protein antibody positivity, or increased C reactive protein. INTERVENTIONS Randomised 1:1:1:1, stratified by country, sex, and anti-citrullinated protein antibody status. All participants started methotrexate combined with (a) active conventional treatment (either prednisolone tapered to 5 mg/day, or sulfasalazine combined with hydroxychloroquine and intraarticular corticosteroids), (b) certolizumab pegol, (c) abatacept, or (d) tocilizumab. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was adjusted clinical disease activity index remission (CDAI <= 2.8) at 24 weeks with active conventional treatment as the reference. Key secondary outcomes and analyses included CDAI remission at 12 weeks and over time, other remission criteria, a non-inferiority analysis, and harms. RESULTS 812 patients underwent randomisation. The mean age was 54.3 years (standard deviation 14.7) and 68.8% were women. Baseline disease activity score of 28 joints was 5.0 (standard deviation 1.1). Adjusted 24 week CDAI remission rates were 42.7% (95% confidence interval 36.1% to 49.3%) for active conventional treatment, 46.5% (39.9% to 53.1%) for certolizumab pegol, 52.0% (45.5% to 58.6%) for abatacept, and 42.1% (35.3% to 48.8%) for tocilizumab. Corresponding absolute differences were 3.9% (95% confidence interval -5.5% to 13.2%) for certolizumab pegol, 9.4% (0.1% to 18.7%) for abatacept, and -0.6% (-10.1% to 8.9%) for tocilizumab. Key secondary outcomes showed no major differences among the four treatments. Differences in CDAI remission rates for active conventional treatment versus certolizumab pegol and tocilizumab, but not abatacept, remained within the prespecified non-inferiority margin of 15% (per protocol population). The total number of serious adverse events was 13 (percentage of patients who experienced at least one event 5.6%) for active conventional treatment, 20 (8.4%) for certolizumab pegol, 10 (4.9%) for abatacept, and 10 (4.9%) for tocilizumab. Eleven patients treated with abatacept stopped treatment early compared with 20-23 patients in the other arms. CONCLUSIONS All four treatments achieved high remission rates. Higher CDAI remission rate was observed for abatacept versus active conventional treatment, but not for certolizumab pegol or tocilizumab versus active conventional treatment. Other remission rates were similar across treatments. Non-inferiority analysis indicated that active conventional treatment was non-inferior to certolizumab pegol and tocilizumab, but not to abatacept. The results highlight the efficacy and safety of active conventional treatment based on methotrexate combined with corticosteroids, with nominally better results for abatacept, in treatment naive early rheumatoid arthritis.
  •  
7.
  •  
8.
  • Lagiou, Pagona, et al. (författare)
  • Low carbohydrate-high protein diet and incidence of cardiovascular diseases in Swedish women: prospective cohort study
  • 2012
  • Ingår i: The BMJ. - : B M J PUBLISHING GROUP. - 1756-1833. ; 344
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Objective To study the long term consequences of low carbohydrate diets, generally characterised by concomitant increases in protein intake, on cardiovascular health. Design Prospective cohort study. Setting Uppsala, Sweden. Participants From a random population sample, 43 396 Swedish women, aged 30-49 years at baseline, completed an extensive dietary questionnaire and were followed-up for an average of 15.7 years. Main outcome measures Association of incident cardiovascular diseases (ascertained by linkage with nationwide registries), overall and by diagnostic category, with decreasing carbohydrate intake (in tenths), increasing protein intake (in tenths), and an additive combination of these variables (low carbohydrate-high protein score, from 2 to 20), adjusted for intake of energy, intake of saturated and unsaturated fat, and several non-dietary variables. Results A one tenth decrease in carbohydrate intake or increase in protein intake or a 2 unit increase in the low carbohydrate-high protein score were all statistically significantly associated with increasing incidence of cardiovascular disease overall (n=1270)-incidence rate ratio estimates 1.04 (95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.08), 1.04 (1.02 to 1.06), and 1.05 (1.02 to 1.08). No heterogeneity existed in the association of any of these scores with the five studied cardiovascular outcomes: ischaemic heart disease (n=703), ischaemic stroke (n=294), haemorrhagic stroke (n=70), subarachnoid haemorrhage (n=121), and peripheral arterial disease (n=82). Conclusions Low carbohydrate-high protein diets, used on a regular basis and without consideration of the nature of carbohydrates or the source of proteins, are associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease.
  •  
9.
  • Lind, Marcus, 1976, et al. (författare)
  • HbA(1c) level as a risk factor for retinopathy and nephropathy in children and adults with type 1 diabetes: Swedish population based cohort study
  • 2019
  • Ingår i: Bmj-British Medical Journal. - : BMJ. - 1756-1833. ; 366
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • OBJECTIVE To evaluate if the lowest target level for glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) of < 6.5% is associated with lower risk for retinopathy and nephropathy than less tight control in children and adults with type 1 diabetes. Swedish National Diabetes Registry, 1 January 1998 to 31 December 2017. 10 398 children and adults with type 1 diabetes followed from diagnosis, or close thereafter, until end of 2017. Relative risk (odds ratios) for retinopathy and nephropathy for different mean levels of HbA(1c). Mean age of participants was 14.7 years (43.4% female), mean duration of diabetes was 1.3 years, and mean HbA(1c) level was 8.0% (63.4 mmol/mol). After adjustment for age, sex, duration of diabetes, blood pressure, blood lipid levels, body mass index, and smoking, the odds ratio for mean HbA(1c) < 6.5% (< 48 mmol/mol) compared with 6.5-6.9% (48-52 mmol/mol) for any retinopathy (simplex or worse) was 0.77 (95% confidence interval 0.56 to 1.05, P=0.10), for preproliferative diabetic retinopathy or worse was 3.29 (0.99 to 10.96, P=0.05), for proliferative diabetic retinopathy was 2.48 (0.71 to 8.62, P=0.15), for microalbuminuria or worse was 0.98 (0.60 to 1.61, P=0.95), and for macroalbuminuria was 2.47 (0.69 to 8.87, P=0.17). Compared with HbA(1c) levels 6.56.9%, HbA(1c) levels 7.0-7.4% (53-57 mmol/mol) were associated with an increased risk of any retinopathy (1.31, 1.05 to 1.64, P=0.02) and microalbuminuria (1.55, 1.03 to 2.32, P=0.03). The risk for proliferative retinopathy (5.98, 2.10 to 17.06, P<0.001) and macroalbuminuria (3.43, 1.14 to 10.26, P=0.03) increased at HbA(1c) levels > 8.6% (> 70 mmol/mol). The risk for severe hypoglycaemia was increased at mean HbA(1c) < 6.5% compared with 6.5-6.9% (relative risk 1.34, 95% confidence interval 1.09 to 1.64, P=0.005). Risk of retinopathy and nephropathy did not differ at HbA(1c) levels < 6.5% but increased for severe hypoglycaemia compared with HbA(1c) levels 6.5-6.9%. The risk for severe complications mainly occurred at HbA(1c) levels > 8.6%, but for milder complications was increased at HbA(1c) levels > 7.0%.
  •  
10.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Resultat 1-10 av 15

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy