| 1. |
- Bosco, Cecilia, et al.
(author)
-
Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy and Risk of Thromboembolic Events
- 2017
-
In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. - : ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC. - 0360-3016 .- 1879-355X. ; 97:5, s. 1026-1031
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Purpose: To investigate the risk of thromboembolic disease (TED) after radiation therapy (RT) with curative intent for prostate cancer (PCa).Patients and Methods: We identified all men who received RT as curative treatment (n=9410) and grouped according to external beam RT (EBRT) or brachytherapy (BT). By comparing with an age-and county-matched comparison cohort of PCa-free men (n = 46,826), we investigated risk of TED after RT using Cox proportional hazard regression models. The model was adjusted for tumor characteristics, demographics, comorbidities, PCa treatments, and known risk factors of TED, such as recent surgery and disease progression.Results: Between 2006 and 2013, 6232 men with PCa received EBRT, and 3178 underwent BT. A statistically significant association was found between EBRT and BT and risk of pulmonary embolism in the crude analysis. However, upon adjusting for known TED risk factors these associations disappeared. No significant associations were found between BT or EBRT and deep venous thrombosis.Conclusion: Curative RT for prostate cancer using contemporary methodologies was not associated with an increased risk of TED.
|
|
| 2. |
- Daşu, Alexandru, et al.
(author)
-
Secondary malignancies from prostate cancer radiation treatment : a risk analysis of the influence of target margins and fractionation patterns
- 2011
-
In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. - : Elsevier BV. - 0360-3016 .- 1879-355X. ; 79:3, s. 738-746
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- PURPOSE: This study explores the implications for cancer induction of treatment details such as fractionation, planning target volume (PTV) definition, and interpatient variations, which are relevant for the radiation treatment of prostate carcinomas.METHODS AND MATERIALS: Treatment planning data from 100 patients have been analyzed with a risk model based on the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation competition model. The risk model can account for dose heterogeneity and fractionation effects characteristic for modern radiotherapy. Biologically relevant parameters from clinical and experimental data have been used with the model.RESULTS: The results suggested that changes in prescribed dose could lead to a modification of the risks for individual organs surrounding the clinical target volume (CTV) but that the total risk appears to be less affected by changes in the target dose. Larger differences are observed for modifications of the margins between the CTV and the PTV because these have direct impact onto the dose level and dose heterogeneity in the healthy tissues surrounding the CTV. Interpatient anatomic variations also have to be taken into consideration for studies of the risk for cancer induction from radiotherapy.CONCLUSIONS: The results have shown the complex interplay between the risk for secondary malignancies, the details of the treatment delivery, and the patient heterogeneity that may influence comparisons between the long-term effects of various treatment techniques. Nevertheless, absolute risk levels seem very small and comparable to mortality risks from surgical interventions, thus supporting the robustness of radiation therapy as a successful treatment modality for prostate carcinomas.
|
|
| 3. |
- Killander, Fredrika, et al.
(author)
-
No Increased Cardiac Mortality or Morbidity of Radiation Therapy in Breast Cancer Patients After Breast-Conserving Surgery : 20-Year Follow-up of the Randomized SweBCGRT Trial
- 2020
-
In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. - : Elsevier BV. - 0360-3016 .- 1879-355X. ; 107:4, s. 701-709
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- PurposeRadiation therapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery reduces locoregional recurrences and improves survival but may cause late side effects. The main purpose of this paper was to investigate long-term side effects after whole breast RT in a randomized clinical trial initiated in 1991 and to report dose-volume data based on individual 3-dimensional treatment plans for organs at risk.Methods and MaterialsThe trial included 1187 patients with T1-2 N0 breast cancer randomized to postoperative tangential whole breast RT or no further treatment. The prescription dose to the clinical target volume was 48 to 54 Gy. We present 20-year follow-up on survival, cause of death, morbidity, and later malignancies. For a cohort of patients (n = 157) with accessible computed tomography–based 3-dimensional treatment plans in Dicom-RT format, dose-volume descriptors for organs at risk were derived. In addition, these were compared with dose-volume data for a cohort of patients treated with contemporary RT techniques.ResultsThe cumulative incidence of cardiac mortality was 12.4% in the control group and 13.0% in the RT group (P = .8). There was an increase in stroke mortality: 3.4% in the control group versus 6.7% in the RT group (P = .018). Incidences of contralateral breast cancer and lung cancer were similar between groups. The median Dmean (range) heart dose for left-sided treatments was 3.0 Gy (1.1-8.1), and the corresponding value for patients treated in 2017 was 1.5 Gy (0.4-6.0).ConclusionsIn this trial, serious late side effects of whole breast RT were limited and less than previously reported in large meta-analyses. We observed no increase in cardiac mortality in irradiated patients. Doses to the heart were a median Dmean of 3.0 Gy for left-sided RT. The observed increase in stroke mortality may partly be secondary to cardiac side effects, complications to anticoagulant treatment, or to chance, rather than a direct side effect of tangential whole breast irradiation.
|
|
| 4. |
- Killander, F, et al.
(author)
-
No increased cardiac mortality or morbidity of radiotherapy in breast cancer patients after breast conserving surgery: 20 years follow-up of the randomised x trial.
- 2020
-
In: International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics. - : Elsevier BV. - 1879-355X .- 0360-3016. ; 107:4, s. 701-9
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Radiotherapy (RT) after breast conserving surgery reduces loco-regional recurrences and improves survival, but may cause late side effects. The main purpose of this paper was to investigate long-term side effects after whole breast RT in a randomised clinical trial initiated in 1991 and to report dose-volume data based on individual 3D treatment plans for organs at risk (OR).The trial included 1187 T1-2 N0 breast cancer patients randomised to postoperative tangential whole breast radiotherapy or no further treatment. The prescription dose to the clinical target volume was 48-54 Gy. We present 20 year follow-up on survival, cause of death, morbidity and later malignancies. For a cohort of patients (n=157) with accessible CT-based 3D treatment plans in Dicom-RT format, dose-volume descriptors for OR were derived. In addition, these were compared with dose-volume data for a cohort of patients treated with contemporary RT techniques.The cumulative incidence of cardiac mortality was 12.4 % in the control group and 13.0 % in the RT group (P= 0.8). There was an increase in stroke mortality, 3.4 % in the control group versus 6.7 % in the RT group (P=0.018). Incidences of contra lateral breast cancer and lung cancer were similar between groups. The median Dmean (range) heart dose for left-sided treatments was 3.0 Gy (1.1-8.1) and the corresponding value for patients treated in 2017 was 1.5 Gy (0.4-6.0).In this trial serious late side effects of whole breast radiotherapy were limited and less than previously reported in large meta-analyses. We observed no increased cardiac mortality in irradiated patients with doses to the heart were median Dmean 3.0 Gy for left-sided RT. The observed increase in stroke mortality may partly be secondary to cardiac side effects, complications to anticoagulant treatment, or to chance, rather than a direct side effect of tangential whole breast irradiation.
|
|
| 5. |
- Nilsson, Per J, et al.
(author)
-
Epidermoid anal cancer : a review of a population-based series of 308 consecutive patients treated according to prospective protocols
- 2005
-
In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. - New York, USA : Elsevier. - 0360-3016 .- 1879-355X. ; 61, s. 92-102
-
Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Purpose: The primary therapy in epidermoid anal cancer is radiotherapy, generally with chemotherapy. The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been infrequently reported in the literature. This study presents results from a large population-based series and provides comparisons between different treatments.Methods and materials: Between 1985 and 2000, 308 patients with invasive epidermoid anal cancer were diagnosed in the Stockholm Health Care Region. Treatment was given according to defined protocols. External beam radiotherapy alone or with concomitant bleomycin and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy alone were the primary treatments. Radical surgery was reserved for poor responders or recurrences. Data were reviewed with regard to treatment, outcome, and prognostic factors.Results: Among the 276 patients (90%) treated with curative intent, 264 (96%) received treatment in accordance with the protocols. The overall 5-year survival rate was 68%. Among the 142 patients with locally advanced tumors (T > or =4 cm or N+), patients treated with neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy (n = 91) had significantly better complete response rates compared with patients treated with radiotherapy with or without bleomycin (n = 51) (92% vs. 76%, p < 0.01). A significantly increased overall 5-year survival rate was also found among patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy (63% vs. 44%, p < 0.05).Conclusion: Structured treatment protocols result in favorable outcome on a population level. The results further suggest a significant therapeutic gain from including neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced anal cancer.
|
|
| 6. |
- Rasmusson, Elisabeth, et al.
(author)
-
Erectile Dysfunction and Absorbed Dose to Penile Base Structures in a Randomized Trial Comparing Ultrahypofractionated and Conventionally Fractionated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer
- 2020
-
In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. - : Elsevier. - 0360-3016 .- 1879-355X. ; 107:1, s. 143-151
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Purpose: To study the relationships between absorbed dose to penile base structures and erectile dysfunction (ED) in patients treated with ultrahypofractionated (UHF) radiation therapy (RT) or conventionally fractionated (CF) RT for prostate cancer.Methods and Materials: This dose-response study comprises 673 patients (57%) of the 1180 per-protocol patients included in the HYPO-RT-PC trial (median follow-up 5, years), where patients were randomized to CF (39 × 2.0 Gy, 8 weeks) or UHF (7 × 6.1 Gy, 2.5 weeks). No androgen deprivation therapy was allowed. Only patients with erectile function sufficient for intercourse at baseline and complete RT data were included in this study. Erectile function was assessed by physician at regular follow-ups. The main endpoint was severe ED (EDs). The penile bulb (PB) and crus were retrospectively delineated on the treatment planning computed tomography scans. Dose-volume descriptors were derived from EQD2 converted dose matrices (α/β = 3 Gy). Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression and logistic regression were used to find predictors for EDS.Results: No significant difference in EDs was found between CF and UHF. During the follow-up period, EDs occurred in 27% of the patients in both treatment groups. Average (median) PB mean dose, Dmean, was 24.5 (20.2) in CF and 18.7 (13.1) Gy3 in UHF. Age was the only significant predictor for EDs in Cox analyses. All dose-volume variables contributed significantly in univariable logistic regression at 2-year follow-up. Age and near maximum dose (D2%) were significant predictors for EDs in multivariable logistic regression analyses at both 1 and 2 years.Conclusions: The frequency of EDS was similar in the CF and UHF treatment groups. Age at radiation therapy was the strongest predictor for EDs, followed by dose to PB, and was most evident for younger patients. We propose D2 % <50 Gy3 and Dmean <20 Gy3 to the PB as the primary objectives to be applied in the treatment planning process.
|
|
| 7. |
- Syk, Erik, et al.
(author)
-
Local recurrence in rectal cancer : anatomic localization and effect on radiation target
- 2008
-
In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. - : Elsevier BV. - 0360-3016 .- 1879-355X. ; 72:3, s. 658-64
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- PURPOSE: To determine the sites of local recurrence after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in an effort to optimize the radiation target. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 155 patients with recurrence after abdominal resection for rectal cancer were identified from a population-based consecutive cohort of 2,315 patients who had undergone surgery by surgeons trained in the total mesorectal excision procedure. A total of 99 cross-sectional imaging studies were retrieved and re-examined by one radiologist. The clinical records were examined for the remaining patients. RESULTS: Evidence of residual mesorectal fat was identified in 50 of the 99 patients. In 83 patients, local recurrence was identified on the imaging studies. All recurrences were within the irradiated volume if the patients had undergone preoperative radiotherapy or within the same volume if they had not. The site of recurrence was in the lower 75% of the pelvis, anatomically below the S1-S2 interspace for all patients. Only 5 of the 44 recurrences in patients with primary tumors >5 cm from the anal verge were in the lowest 20% of the pelvis. Six recurrences involved the lateral lymph nodes. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that a lowering of the upper limit of the clinical target volume could be introduced. The anal sphincter complex with surrounding tissue could also be excluded in patients with primary tumors >5 cm from the anal verge.
|
|
