SwePub
Tyck till om SwePub Sök här!
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

L773:2000 1525 OR L773:2000 1525
 

Search: L773:2000 1525 OR L773:2000 1525 > Bjurström Erling 1949 > Whose Canon? :

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Whose Canon? : Culturalization versus Democratization

Bjurström, Erling, 1949- (author)
Linköpings universitet,Tema Kultur och samhälle – Tema Q,Filosofiska fakulteten,Tema Q
 (creator_code:org_t)
2012-06-01
2012
English.
In: Culture Unbound. Journal of Current Cultural Research. - : Linköping University Electronic Press. - 2000-1525 .- 2000-1525. ; 4:14, s. 257-274
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Current accounts – and particularly the critique – of canon formation are primarily based on some form of identity politics. In the 20th century a representational model of social identities replaced cultivation as the primary means to democratize the canons of the fine arts. In a parallel development, the discourse on canons has shifted its focus from processes of inclusion to those of exclusion. This shift corresponds, on the one hand, to the construction of so-called alternative canons or counter-canons, and, on the other hand, to attempts to restore the authority of canons considered to be in a state of crisis or decaying. Regardless of the democratic stance of these efforts, the construction of alternatives or the reestablishment of decaying canons does not seem to achieve their aims, since they break with the explicit and implicit rules of canon formation. Politically motivated attempts to revise or restore a specific canon make the workings of canon formation too visible, transparent and calculated, thereby breaking the spell of its imaginary character. Retracing the history of the canonization of the fine arts reveals that it was originally tied to the disembedding of artists and artworks from social and worldly affairs, whereas debates about canons of the fine arts since the end of the 20th century are heavily dependent on their social, cultural and historical reembedding. The latter has the character of disenchantment, but has also fettered the canon debate in notions of “our” versus “their” culture. However, by emphasizing the dedifferentiation of contemporary processes of culturalization, the advancing canonization of popular culture seems to be able to break with identity politics that foster notions of “our” culture in the present thinking on canons, and push it in a more transgressive, syncretic or hybrid direction.

Keyword

Canon
canon formation
canons of fine art
canons of popular culture
culturalization
democratization
differentiation
dedifferentiation

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Bjurström, Erlin ...
Articles in the publication
Culture Unbound. ...
By the university
Linköping University

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view