SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Utökad sökning

Träfflista för sökning "L773:2397 3374 ;lar1:(mdh)"

Sökning: L773:2397 3374 > Mälardalens universitet

  • Resultat 1-2 av 2
Sortera/gruppera träfflistan
   
NumreringReferensOmslagsbildHitta
1.
  • Strimling, Pontus, et al. (författare)
  • Asymmetries in punishment propensity may drive the civilizing process
  • 2018
  • Ingår i: Nature Human Behaviour. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 2397-3374. ; 2:2, s. 148-155
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Norms about hygiene and violence have both shown a tendency to become increasingly strict, in the sense that the handling of bodily fluids and the use of violence have become increasingly restricted. The generality of this directional change across a large number of societies has not been captured by previous explanations. We propose an explanation of the directional change that is based on the aggregation of everyday interactions. This theory posits that directional norm change can come about if there is an asymmetry in punishment propensity between the people who prefer stricter norms and those who prefer looser norms. Asymmetry in punishment can arise from underlying asymmetry in the threat perceived, where a stricter-than-preferred behaviour is perceived as inherently less threatening than a looser one. We demonstrate the logic of the theory using a formal model and test some of its assumptions through survey experiments.
  •  
2.
  • Strimling, Pontus, et al. (författare)
  • The connection between moral positions and moral arguments drives opinion change
  • 2019
  • Ingår i: Nature Human Behaviour. - : NLM (Medline). - 2397-3374. ; 3:9, s. 922-930
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Liberals and conservatives often take opposing positions on moral issues. But what makes a moral position liberal or conservative? Why does public opinion tend to become more liberal over time? And why does public opinion change especially fast on certain issues, such as gay rights? We offer an explanation based on how different positions connect with different kinds of moral arguments. Based on a formal model of opinion dynamics, we predicted that positions better connected to harm and fairness arguments will be more popular among liberals and will become more popular over time among liberals and conservatives. Finally, the speed of this trend will be faster the better the position connects to harm and fairness arguments. These predictions all held with high accuracy in 44 years of polling on moral opinions. The model explains the connection between ideology and moral opinions, and generates precise predictions for future opinion change.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Resultat 1-2 av 2
Typ av publikation
tidskriftsartikel (2)
Typ av innehåll
refereegranskat (2)
Författare/redaktör
Strimling, Pontus (2)
Eriksson, Kimmo, 196 ... (2)
Vartanova, I. (1)
de Barra, Micheal (1)
Jansson, Fredrik (1)
Lärosäte
Stockholms universitet (2)
Mälardalens universitet  (2)Ta bort avgränsningen
Språk
Engelska (2)
Forskningsämne (UKÄ/SCB)
Naturvetenskap (2)
Samhällsvetenskap (2)
Humaniora (1)

År

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy