| 1. |
- Lagergren, Jesper, et al.
(författare)
-
Weekday of esophageal cancer surgery and its relation to prognosis
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Annals of Surgery. - Stockholm : Karolinska Institutet, Dept of Molecular Medicine and Surgery. - 0003-4932. ; 263:6, s. 1133-1137
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In this nationwide Swedish study, later weekday of esophageal cancer surgery entailed increased long-term mortality, particularly for earlier tumor stages. The increase in 5-year mortality for each later weekday was 7% for all tumor stages, 24% for stages 0-I, 13% for stage II, but was not increased for stages III-IV. Objective: To assess whether weekday of surgery influences long-term survival in esophageal cancer. Summary Background Data: Increased 30-day mortality rates have been reported in patients undergoing elective surgery later compared to earlier in the week Methods: This population-based cohort study included 98% of all esophageal cancer patients who underwent elective surgery in Sweden in 1987-2010, with follow-up until 2014. The association between weekday of surgery and 5-year all-cause and disease-specific mortality was analyzed using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, providing hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusted for age, co-morbidity, tumor stage, histology, neoadjuvant therapy, and surgeon volume. Results: Among 1,748 included patients, surgery conducted Wednesday-Friday entailed 13% increased all-cause 5-year mortality compared to surgery Monday-Tuesday (HR=1.13, 95% CI 1.01-1.26). The corresponding association was strong for early tumor stages (0-I) (HR=1.59, 95% CI 1.17-2.16), moderate for intermediate tumor stage (II) (HR=1.28, 95% CI 1.07-1.53), and absent in advanced tumor stages (III-IV) (HR=0.93, 95%CI 0.79-1.09). The increase in 5-year mortality for each later weekday (discrete variable) was 7% for all tumor stages (HR=1.07, 95% CI 1.02-1.12), 24% for early tumor stages (HR=1.24, 95% CI 1.09-1.41), 13% for intermediate stage (HR=1.13, 95% CI 1.05-1.22), while no increase was found for advanced stages (HR=0.98, 95% CI 0.92-1.05). The disease-specific 5-year mortality was similar to the all-cause mortality. Conclusions: The increased 5-year mortality of potentially curable esophageal cancer following surgery later in the week suggests that this surgery is better performed earlier in the week.
|
|
| 2. |
- Maret-Ouda, John, et al.
(författare)
-
Antireflux surgery and risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma : a systematic review and meta-analysis
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Annals of Surgery. - Stockholm : Karolinska Institutet, Dept of Molecular Medicine and Surgery. - 0003-4932. ; 263:2, s. 251-257
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: To investigate the preventive effect of antireflux surgery against esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), compared to medical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and to the background population. Background: GERD is causally associated with EAC. Effective symptomatic treatment can be achieved with medication and antireflux surgery, yet the possible preventive effect on EAC development remains unclear. Methods: This systematic review identified 10 studies comparing EAC risk following antireflux surgery with non-operated GERD patients, including 7 studies of patients with Barrett’s esophagus; and 2 studies comparing EAC risk after antireflux surgery to the background population. A fixed-effects Poisson meta-analysis was conducted to calculate pooled incidence rate ratios (IRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: The pooled IRR in patients following antireflux surgery was 0.76 (95% CI 0.42-1.39) compared to medically treated GERD patients. In patients with Barrett’s esophagus, the corresponding IRR was 0.46 (95% CI 0.20-1.08), and 0.26 (95% CI 0.09-0.79) when restricted to publications after 2000. There was no difference in EAC risk between antireflux surgery and medical treatment in GERD patients without known Barrett’s esophagus (IRR 0.98, 95% CI 0.72-1.33). The EAC risk remained elevated in patients following antireflux surgery compared to the background population (IRR 10.78, 95% CI 8.48-13.71). While the clinical heterogeneity of the included studies was high, the statistical heterogeneity was low. Conclusions: Antireflux surgery may prevent EAC better than medical therapy in patients with Barrett’s esophagus. The EAC risk following antireflux surgery does not seem to revert to that of the background population.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Angenete, Eva, 1972, et al.
(författare)
-
Laparoscopic Lavage Is Feasible and Safe for the Treatment of Perforated Diverticulitis With Purulent Peritonitis The First Results From the Randomized Controlled Trial DILALA
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Annals of Surgery. - : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. - 0003-4932 .- 1528-1140. ; 263:1, s. 117-122
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective:To evaluate short-term outcomes of a new treatment for perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis in a randomized controlled trial.Background:Perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis (Hinchey III) has traditionally been treated with surgery including colon resection and stoma (Hartmann procedure) with considerable postoperative morbidity and mortality. Laparoscopic lavage has been suggested as a less invasive surgical treatment.Methods:Laparoscopic lavage was compared with colon resection and stoma in a randomized controlled multicenter trial, DILALA (ISRCTN82208287). Initial diagnostic laparoscopy showing Hinchey III was followed by randomization. Clinical data was collected up to 12 weeks postoperatively.Results: Eighty-three patients were randomized, out of whom 39 patients in laparoscopic lavage and 36 patients in the Hartmann procedure groups were available for analysis. Morbidity and mortality after laparoscopic lavage did not differ when compared with the Hartmann procedure. Laparoscopic lavage resulted in shorter operating time, shorter time in the recovery unit, and shorter hospital stay.Conclusions:In this trial, laparoscopic lavage as treatment for patients with perforated diverticulitis Hinchey III was feasible and safe in the short-term.
|
|
| 5. |
- Arver, Brita, et al.
(författare)
-
Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Swedish Women at High Risk of Breast Cancer: A National Survey.
- 2011
-
Ingår i: Annals of surgery. - : Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 1999. - 1528-1140 .- 0003-4932. ; 253:6, s. 1147-1154
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE:: This study attempted a national inventory of all bilateral prophylactic mastectomies performed in Sweden between 1995 and 2005 in high-risk women without a previous breast malignancy. The primary aim was to investigate the breast cancer incidence after surgery. Secondary aims were to describe the preoperative risk assessment, operation techniques, complications, histopathological findings, and regional differences. METHODS:: Geneticists, oncologists and surgeons performing prophylactic breast surgery were asked to identify all women eligible for inclusion in their region. The medical records were reviewed in each region and the data were analyzed centrally. The BOADICEA risk assessment model was used to calculate the number of expected/prevented breast cancers during the follow-up period. RESULTS:: A total of 223 women operated on in 8 hospitals were identified. During a mean follow-up of 6.6 years, no primary breast cancer was observed compared with 12 expected cases. However, 1 woman succumbed 9 years post mastectomy to widespread adenocarcinoma of uncertain origin. Median age at operation was 40 years. A total of 58% were BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. All but 3 women underwent breast reconstruction, 208 with implants and 12 with autologous tissue. Four small, unifocal, invasive cancers and 4 ductal carcinoma in situ were found in the mastectomy specimens. The incidence of nonbreast related complications was low (3%). Implant loss due to infection/necrosis occurred in 21 women (10%) but a majority received a new implant later. In total, 64% of the women underwent at least 1unanticipated secondary operation. CONCLUSIONS:: Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy is safe and efficacious in reducing future breast cancer in asymptomatic women at high risk. Unanticipated reoperations are common. Given the small number of patients centralization seems justified.
|
|
| 6. |
- Backman, Olof, et al.
(författare)
-
Gastric Bypass Surgery Reduces De Novo Cases of Type 2 Diabetes to Population Levels : A Nationwide Cohort Study From Sweden
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Annals of Surgery. - : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. - 0003-4932 .- 1528-1140. ; 269:5, s. 895-902
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine long-term changes in pharmacological treatment of type 2 diabetes after primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery, in patients with and without pharmacological treatment of diabetes preoperatively.SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Several studies have shown that gastric bypass has good effect on diabetes, at least in the short-term. This study is a nationwide cohort study using Swedish registers, with basically no patients lost to follow-up during up to 7 years after surgery.METHODS: The effect of RYGB on type 2 diabetes drug treatment was evaluated in this nationwide matched cohort study. Participants were 22,047 adults with BMI ≥30 identified in the nationwide Scandinavian Surgical Obesity Registry, who underwent primary RYGB between 2007 and 2012. For each individual, up to 10 general population comparators were matched on birth year, sex, and place of residence. Prescription data were retrieved from the nationwide Swedish Prescribed Drug Register through September 2015. Incident use of pharmacological treatment was analyzed using Cox regression.RESULTS: Sixty-seven percent of patients with pharmacological treatment of type 2 diabetes before surgery were not using diabetes drugs 2 years after surgery and 61% of patients were not pharmacologically treated up to 7 years after surgery. In patients not using diabetes drugs at baseline, there were 189 new cases of pharmacological treatment of type 2 diabetes in the surgery group and 2319 in the matched general population comparators during a median follow-up of 4.6 years (incidence: 21.4 vs 27.9 per 10,000 person-years; adjusted hazard ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.67-0.89; P < 0.001).CONCLUSIONS: Gastric bypass surgery not only induces remission of pharmacological treatment of type 2 diabetes but also protects from new onset of pharmacological diabetes treatment. The effect seems to persist in most, but not all, patients over 7 years of follow-up.
|
|
| 7. |
- Bergqvist, David, et al.
(författare)
-
Treatment of vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome : a systematic review
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Annals of Surgery. - 0003-4932 .- 1528-1140. ; 258:2, s. 257-261
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE:To provide the collected evidence from all literature reports.BACKGROUND:Vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) is a rare connective tissue disorder with serious hemorrhagic consequences. Most experience on treatment is based on case reports and small case series.METHOD:A systematic literature review was performed. PubMed and reference lists were scrutinized.RESULTS:A total of 231 patients were identified with no gender preponderance. Aneurysms were present in 40%, often multiple. In 33%, there was an arterial rupture without an underlying aneurysm. Carotidocavernous fistula was seen in 18%. After open surgery the mortality was 30%; after endovascular procedures, it was 24%; in a group of miscellaneous cases, it was 60%; and the overall mortality was 39%. The median age of patients at death was 31 years. The median follow-up time was 12 months (5 days-7 years), but in 20% cases, it was not reported. In only 29 of the 119 recent patients (24%) the mutation was verified with molecular genetic testing.CONCLUSIONS:Vascular EDS is a serious disorder with high mortality, which does not seem to have been influenced by new treatment methods. Invasive methods should be used only when necessary, primarily to save the patients' life. Whenever possible, the genetic molecular defect should be identified. The results of this review may be affected by publications bias. Ideally, a prospective registry should be created.
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
- Cashin, Peter H, 1984-, et al.
(författare)
-
Patient Selection for Cytoreductive Surgery in Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis using Serum Tumour Markers – an Observational Cohort Study
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Annals of Surgery. - 0003-4932 .- 1528-1140. ; 256:6, s. 1078-1083
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: There were 2 objectives: first, to investigate how many patients were excluded from surgery on the basis of the radiological extent of the peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) or the clinical examination; and second, to develop a score based primarily on serum tumor markers (STMs) that could predict short cancer-specific survival (<12 months). Background: Patient selection and prediction of prognosis is crucial for successful treatment of colorectal PC. Methods: All patients with colorectal PC referred for cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy (2005-2008) at Uppsala University hospital were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups-nonsurgery and surgery. Clinicopathological and laboratory parameters were collected in the surgery group. A Corep (COloREctal-Pc) score was developed using hazard ratios from histology, hematological status, serial serum tumor markers (STMs), and STM changes over time. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predicted value (PPV), and negative predicted value (NPV) were calculated in a second validating dataset (n = 24) with a survival cutoff of less than 12 months. Results: A total of 107 patients were included in the study, 42 in the nonsurgery group and 65 in the surgery group. In the nonsurgery group, 2 patients were excluded solely on the basis of the radiological extent of PC and 7 patients on clinical examination. The Corep score ranged from 0 to 18. A score of 6 or more showed a validated sensitivity of 80%, specificity 100%, PPV 1.0, and NPV 0.93. Conclusions: Radiological extent of PC was not a main deciding factor for treatment decisions and had less impact than the clinical examination. The Corep score identified patients with short cancer-specific survival that may not be suitable for treatment.
|
|
