| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Cristiani, R, et al.
(författare)
-
Regarding "Editorial Commentary: Meniscal Repair-Why Bother?"
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association. - : Elsevier BV. - 1526-3231. ; 36:7, s. 1794-1795
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Sundemo, David, et al.
(författare)
-
Editorial Commentary: Diagnosis and Treatment of Generalized Joint Hypermobility in Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery. - : Elsevier BV. - 0749-8063 .- 1526-3231. ; 37:7, s. 2348-2350
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Generalized joint hypermobility (GJH), or laxity, is defined as hyperextensibility of the synovial joints. Hypermobility is caused by alterations in the connective tissues, in turn caused by various factors including impaired function of collagen proteins. For measurement of knee GJH, we highly recommend using the Beighton score, the most frequently used method in both the sports medicine and other literature. Our recommendations on how to treat patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury with generalized joint hypermobility include the following: (1) use patellar-tendon or quadriceps tendon autograft for ACL reconstruction; (2) always consider performing a lateral extra-articular tenodesis; and (3) make sure patients pass a return to sport test battery including strength, hop performance, subjective knee function, and movement quality. Delay to return to sport may be as long as 1 year after surgery.
|
|
| 6. |
- Svantesson, Eleonor, et al.
(författare)
-
Graft Choice for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With a Concomitant Non-surgically Treated Medial Collateral Ligament Injury Does Not Influence the Risk of Revision.
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association. - : Elsevier BV. - 1526-3231. ; 31:1, s. 199-211
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- To compare the risk of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision and the patient-reported outcome after ACL reconstruction with a concomitant non-surgically treated medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury with regard to 3 ACL graft choices; the use of semitendinosus (ST), the use of semitendinosus-gracilis (ST-G), and the use of patellar tendon (PT) autograft. It was hypothesized that the use of ST-G would be associated with a greater risk of ACL revision and poorer patient-reported knee function.Patients older than 15years of age registered for a primary ACL reconstruction with a concomitant non-surgically treated MCL injury in the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry were assessed for eligibility. Three groups were created according to ACL autograft choice; the ST, the ST-G, and the PT group. The primary outcomes were ACL revision and the 1- and 2-year Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), including the KOOS patient acceptable symptom state (PASS). Cox regression analysis was applied to determine the proportional hazard ratio (HR) of primary ACL reconstruction survival. The KOOS was compared using the Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher exact test.A total of 622 patients (mean age 29.7years, 42.4% women) were included. There was no difference in the risk of ACL revision for either the ST group (HR 1.354; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.678-2.702 or the PT group (HR0.837; 95% CI 0.334-2.100), compared with the ST-G group. The ST group reported a greater mean 2-year KOOS sports and recreation (68.5, standard deviation [SD] 28.5) than the ST-G group (57.4 [SD 27.6], P= .010) and the PT group (54.1 [SD30.3], P= .006). The ST group was superior in terms of achieving PASS in sports and recreation (55.3%; 95% CI 44.1-66.1%) compared with both the ST-G (37.4%; 95% CI 29.8-45.5%; P= .014) and the PT group (33.9%; 95% CI 22.1-47.4%; P= .009).The risk of ACL revision did not differ between HT and PTautografts in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with a non-surgically treated MCL injury. However, the use of ST-Gwas associated with poorer 2-year patient-reported knee function compared with the ST.Retrospective comparative trial, Level III.
|
|
