| 1. |
- Al-Baldawi, Riyadh, et al.
(författare)
-
Underskatta inte religiös extremism
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Svenska Dagbladet. - 1101-2412. ; :2018-01-08, s. 4-4
-
Tidskriftsartikel (populärvet., debatt m.m.)abstract
- En del av det svenska biståndets insatser planerade för Mellanöstern kan bli omöjliga att genomföra. Sidas analytiker har inte tagit tillräcklig hänsyn till en ökande religiös våldsbejakande extremism och dess genomslag i hela området.
|
|
| 2. |
- Alexius, Katarina, et al.
(författare)
-
Forskare: Ge socialtjänsten rätt verktyg
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Svenska dagbladet. - Stockholm. - 1101-2412. ; :2015-12-11
-
Tidskriftsartikel (populärvet., debatt m.m.)abstract
- Att socialtjänstens personal kan hantera och tolka nyckelbegrepp som ”barnets bästa” och ”god vård” är helt avgörande för förstärkningar av barns reella rättigheter, skriver forskare vid Stockholms universitet och Ersta Sköndal högskola.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Gallagher, Bernard, et al.
(författare)
-
National Human Research Ethics : A Preliminary Comparative Case Study of Germany, Great Britain, Romania, and Sweden
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Ethics & Behavior. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1050-8422 .- 1532-7019. ; 26:7, s. 586-606
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Although international research is increasing in volume and importance, there remains a dearth of knowledge on similarities and differences in “national human research ethics” (NHREs), that is, national ethical guidelines (NEGs), Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), and research stakeholder’ ethical attitudes and behaviors (EABs). We begin to address this situation by reporting upon our experiences in conducting a multinational study into the mental health of children who had a parent/carer in prison. The study was conducted in 4 countries: Germany, Great Britain, Romania, and Sweden. Data on NHREs were gathered via a questionnaire survey, two ethics-related seminars, and ongoing contact between members of the research consortium. There was correspondence but even more so divergence between countries in the availability of NEGs and IRBs and in researcher’ EABs. Differences in NHREs have implications particularly in terms of harmonization but also for ethical philosophy and practice and for research integrity.
|
|
| 7. |
- Holmqvist, Anna
(författare)
-
Integritet på undantag? : En studie av barns röst i patientlagen och patientorganisationer
- 2019
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- This thesis explores discourses regarding children’s voice, in the Swedish Patient Act, as well as in Swedish patient organizations. In the Patient Act, children’s rights as patients are construed on the basis of custodians’ parental rights and the assumption that patients are competent and autonomous adults. The child is given an object position, weaker than an adult patient and subordinated to parents’ authority. Consequently, the integrity of the child is not absolute, as it is construed through an autonomy discourse and a family discourse which set boundaries for the child´s voice in the Patient Act. The family discourse combined with a mass movement discourse form the prerequisits for children’s voice in the context of patient organizations. As a consequence, patient organizations do not act as voice in relation to children’s rights as patients, in the Patient Act. Rather, interviews with representatives of patient organizations show that the parents act as voice having a child in need of health care. The position of children in the organizationsis ambiguous and, rather than having a voice of their own, children can be used in advertising campaigns to attract funding, expressing the voice of the organization. When children are used in this way by organizations, children’s integrity seem to be negotiable. The thesis shows that in both the Patient Act and the patient organizations, the integrity of the child is questioned. Children seem to be regarded as imperfect rights-holders and as imperfect members of society.This perception of the child is traced to dominant ethical perspectives from which children’s human rights have emerged. Drawing on current academic debates, analternative approach to these prevailing ethical perspectives is suggested. Instead of making rights conditional upon presumed autonomy and adulthood, rights can be perceived as relational and expressions of the mutual interdependence of humans, regardless of age and maturity. If rights are seen in this way, with children being understood not as essentially different but differently equal, then the child´s voice can have actual importance.
|
|
| 8. |
- Rejmer, Annika, et al.
(författare)
-
Gemensam vårdnad kan skada
- 1999
-
Ingår i: Dagens nyheter. - Stockholm : AB Dagens nyheter. - 1101-2447. ; :1999-07-23
-
Tidskriftsartikel (populärvet., debatt m.m.)
|
|
| 9. |
- Sandin, Bengt, et al.
(författare)
-
Var går gränsen för statens ansvar? : Upprättelseprocessen för dem som vanvårdats i samhällsvård ur ett historiskt perspektiv på normalitet, aga och barns rättigheter : [What is the limit of state responsibility? A historical perspective on how the state interpreted its responsibility to safeguard children from abuse]
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift. - 0039-0747. ; 124:2, s. 349-377
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In this article, we study the legislative processes that formed the basis for how the state’s role and responsibility to protect and represent children was formulated during the 20th century based on legislative initiatives against corporal punishment. This is the backdrop for an analysis of the scheme to compensate adults that have claimed that they as children had been abused in the care of the state. As a basis for our analyzes, we have used laws and statutes, ordinances, and preparatory works in family and criminal law as well as school and social law. In the process that led up to the compensation scheme a choice was made; child abuse in the past would not be defined according to the norms set by past legislation and government ordinances to protect children from abuse, but in relation to what was believed to be common child-rearing practices. The focus shifted to current understandings of what was normal in the past as well as to how similar abuse would be treated in legal practice in current tort cases disregarding the explicit stands taken by past governments to protect children in care. The opportunity for reconciliation decreased with this development.
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
