| 1. |
- Adell, Emeli, et al.
(författare)
-
The Definition of Acceptance and Acceptability
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Driver Acceptance of New Technology. - Farnham, Surrey, England : Ashgate. - 9781409439844 ; , s. 11-21
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Despite the recognised importance of the concept of acceptance, how and why new technologies are actually accepted by drivers is not well understood. While many studies claim to have measured acceptance, few have explicitly defined what it is. This chapter points out the importance of defining acceptance and categorises definitions that have been used according to their “essence”. Distinctions between different types of acceptance as well as between acceptance and acceptability are also described. A proposal for a common definition of acceptance is then presented and discussed.
|
|
| 2. |
- Hedegaard Sørensen, Claus, et al.
(författare)
-
Governance and Citizen Participation in Shaping Futures of Smart Mobility
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Shaping Smart Mobility Futures : Governance and Policy Instruments in times of Sustainability Transitions - Governance and Policy Instruments in times of Sustainability Transitions. - : Emerald Publishing Limited. - 9781839826504 - 9781839826511 ; , s. 205-219, s. 205-219
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 3. |
- Hedegaard Sörensen, Claus, et al.
(författare)
-
Planning for bus priority
- 2021
-
Ingår i: International Encyclopedia of Transportation. - Oxford : Elsevier. - 9780081026724 ; , s. 254-260, s. 254-260
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Bus priority measures are introduced in cities in order to improve travel time, frequency, and reliability, thereby benefiting the passengers and establishing a more attractive and competitive public transport system. Since first being implemented in Chicago in the late 1930s, bus priority measures are now widely applied across the globe, and a plethora of measures regarding priority in terms of time and space are currently in place. The main challenge for planning and implementing bus priority measures is the conflict over space with other societal purposes and road modes, in particular the car. In addition, the introduction of bus priority is often planned and implemented in a context of institutional complexity, which contributes to making such efforts a challenging task. In this article, political leadership, collaboration, alternative funding schemes, guidelines, and action plans are suggested as important instruments to handle these challenges.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Storbjörk, Sofie, et al.
(författare)
-
Klimatomställningens knäckfrågor
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Att äga framtiden. - Linköping : Linköpings universitet. - 9789176854204 ; , s. 213-220
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 6. |
- Wallsten, Anna, 1980-, et al.
(författare)
-
Is Governing Capacity Undermined? Policy Instruments in Smart Mobility Futures
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Shaping Smart Mobility Futures : Governance and Policy Instruments in times of Sustainability Transitions - Governance and Policy Instruments in times of Sustainability Transitions. - : Emerald Publishing Limited. - 9781839826504 - 9781839826511 ; , s. 153-168, s. 153-168
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The aim of this chapter is to analyse how the governing capacity of current policy instruments might be affected in futures of smart mobility. In order to explore this issue, the authors make use of the so-called NATO (nodality, authority, treasure, organisation) framework for analysing two contrasting scenarios. The analyses show that the overall governing capacity of many of the policy instruments is strengthened or maintained in both of the scenarios. However, the governing capacity of some policy instruments is reduced, and some seem to need calibration, not least because authorities’ access to and control over data are under question. Future governing capacity hinges on access to data, although all resources are, in one way or another, affected.
|
|
