| 1. |
- O'Sullivan, Anna, et al.
(författare)
-
Place of care and death preferences among recently bereaved family members : A cross-sectional survey
- 2024
-
Ingår i: BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. - 2045-435X .- 2045-4368.
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVES: The aim was: (1) to investigate preferred place for end-of-life care and death for bereaved family members who had recently lost a person with advanced illness and (2) to investigate associations between bereaved family members' preferences and individual characteristics, health-related quality of life, as well as associations with their perception of the quality of care that the ill person had received, the ill person's preferred place of death and involvement in decision-making about care.METHODS: A cross-sectional survey with bereaved family members, employing descriptive statistics and multinominal logistic regression analyses.RESULTS: Of the 485 participants, 70.7% were women, 36.1% were ≥70 years old, 34.5% were partners and 51.8% were children of the deceased. Of the bereaved family members, 52% preferred home for place of end-of-life care and 43% for place of death. A higher likelihood of preferring inpatient palliative care was associated with being female and having higher education, whereas a lower likelihood of preferring a nursing home for the place of care and death was associated with higher secondary or higher education. Partners were more likely to prefer hospital for place of care and nursing home for place of death.CONCLUSIONS: Home was the most preferred place for end-of-life care and death. Bereaved people's experiences of end-of-life care may impact their preferences, especially if they had a close relationship, such as a partner who had a higher preference for nursing home and hospital care. Conversations about preferences for the place of care and death considering previous experience are encouraged.
|
|
| 2. |
- Andersson, Viktor, 1994, et al.
(författare)
-
Relating person-centredness to quality-of-life assessments and patient-reported outcomes in healthcare: A critical theoretical discussion
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Nursing Philosophy. - : Wiley. - 1466-7681 .- 1466-769X. ; 23:3
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Engagement with the historical and theoretical underpinnings of measuring quality of life (QoL) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in healthcare is important. Ideas and values that shape such practices—and in the endgame, people's lives—might otherwise remain unexamined, be taken for granted or even essentialized. Our aim is to explicate and theoretically discuss the philosophical tenets underlying the practices of QoL assessment and PRO measurement in relation to the notion of person-centredness. First, we engage with the late-modern history of the concept of QoL and the act of assessing and measuring it. Working with the historical method of genealogy, we describe the development of both QoL assessments and PRO measures (PROMs) within healthcare by accounting for the contextual conditions for their possibility. In this way, the historical and philosophical underpinnings of these measurement practices are highlighted. We move on to analyse theoretical and philosophical underpinnings regarding the use of PROMs and QoL assessments in clinical practice, as demonstrated in review studies thereof. Finally, we offer a critical analysis regarding the state of theory in the literature and conclude that, although improved person-centredness is an implied driver of QoL assessments and PROMs in clinical practice, enhanced theoretical underpinning of the development of QoL assessments is called for.
|
|
| 3. |
- Carlsson, Eva, 1959, et al.
(författare)
-
Development and validation of the preparedness for Colorectal Cancer Surgery Questionnaire: PCSQ-pre 24
- 2016
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Oncology Nursing. - : Elsevier BV. - 1462-3889 .- 1532-2122. ; 25, s. 24-32
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Purpose The aims of the study were to develop and psychometrically evaluate a patient-reported outcome instrument for the measurement of preoperative preparedness in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. Methods This study was conducted in two stages: a) instrument development (item generation, construction of items and domains), empirical verification and b) instrument evaluation. A questionnaire with 28 items measuring preparedness for surgery was developed covering four domains and was tested for content validity with an expert panel and with patients. Psychometric testing of the questionnaire was conducted on 240 patients undergoing elective surgery for colorectal cancer. Results The scale content validity index of the preparedness items was 0.97. The final version consisted of 24 items measuring 4 subscales: Searching for and making use of information, Understanding and involvement in the care process, Making sense of the recovery process and Support and access to medical care. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed good model fit with standardized factor loadings ranging from 0.58 to 0.97. A well-fitting second-order factor model provided support for a total preparedness score with second-order factor loadings ranging from 0.75 to 0.93. The ordinal alpha values of the four latent factors ranged from 0.92 to 0.96, indicating good internal consistency. The polyserial correlations with the total score were 0.64 (p<0.01) for the overall preparedness question and 0.37 (p<0.01) for overall well-being. Conclusion The Swedish Preparedness for Colorectal Cancer Surgery Questionnaire for use in the preoperative phase demonstrated good psychometric properties based on a sound conceptualization of preparedness. © 2016 Elsevier Ltd
|
|
| 4. |
- Feldthusen, Caroline, 1977, et al.
(författare)
-
Centredness in health care: A systematic overview of reviews
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Health Expectations. - : Wiley. - 1369-6513 .- 1369-7625. ; 25:3, s. 885-901
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction The introduction of effective, evidence-based approaches to centredness in health care is hindered by the fact that research results are not easily accessible. This is partly due to the large volume of publications available and because the field is closely linked to and in some ways encompasses adjoining fields of research, for example, shared decision making and narrative medicine. In an attempt to survey the field of centredness in health care, a systematic overview of reviews was conducted with the purpose of illuminating how centredness in health care is presented in current reviews. Methods Searches for relevant reviews were conducted in the databases PubMed, Scopus, Cinahl, PsychINFO, Web of Science and EMBASE using terms connected to centredness in health care. Filters specific to review studies of all types and for inclusion of only English language results as well as a time frame of January 2017-December 2018, were applied. Results The search strategy identified 3697 unique reviews, of which 31 were included in the study. The synthesis of the results from the 31 reviews identified three interrelated main themes: Attributes of centredness (what centredness is), Translation from theory into practice (how centredness is done) and Evaluation of effects (possible ways of measuring effects of centredness). Three main attributes of centeredness found were: being unique, being heard and shared responsibility. Aspects involved in translating theory into practice were sufficient prerequisites, strategies for action and tools used in safeguarding practice. Further, a variety and breadth of measures of effects were found in the included reviews. Conclusions Our synthesis demonstrates that current synthesized research literature on centredness in health care is broad, as it focuses both on explorations of the conceptual basis and the practice, as well as measures of effects. This study provides an understanding of the commonalities identified in the reviews on centredness in healthcare overall, ranging from theory to practice and from practice to evaluation. Patient or Public Contribution Patient representatives were involved during the initiation of the project and in decisions about its focus, although no patient or public representatives made direct contributions to the review process.
|
|
| 5. |
- Forsgren, Emma, 1982, et al.
(författare)
-
The use of text-mining software to facilitate screening of literature on centredness in health care.
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Systematic Reviews. - 2046-4053. ; 12:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Research evidence supporting the implementation of centredness in health care is not easily accessible due to the sheer amount of literature available and the diversity in terminology and conceptualisations used. The use of text-mining functions to semi-automate the process of screening and collating citations for a review is a way of tackling the vast amount of research citations available today. There are several programmes that use text-mining functions to facilitate screening and data extraction for systematic reviews. However, the suitability of these programmes for reviews on broad topics of research, as well as the general uptake by researchers, is unclear. This commentary has a dual aim, which consists in outlining the challenges of screening literature in fields characterised by vague and overlapping conceptualisations, and to exemplify this by exploratory use of text-mining in the context of a scoping review on centredness in health care.
|
|
| 6. |
- Friberg, Febe, 1950, et al.
(författare)
-
Exploration of dynamics in a complex person-centred intervention process based on health professionals' perspectives
- 2018
-
Ingår i: BMC Health Services Research. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1472-6963. ; 18:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: The assessment and evaluation of practical and sustainable development of health care has become a major focus of investigation in health services research. A key challenge for researchers as well as decision-makers in health care is to understand mechanisms influencing how complex interventions work and become embedded in practice, which is significant for both evaluation and later implementation. In this study, we explored nurses' and surgeons' perspectives on performing and participating in a complex multi-centre person-centred intervention process that aimed to support patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer to feel prepared for surgery, discharge and recovery. Method: Data consisted of retrospective interviews with 20 professionals after the intervention, supplemented with prospective conversational data and field notes from workshops and follow-up meetings (n = 51). The data were analysed to construct patterns in line with interpretive description. Results: Although the participants highly valued components of the intervention, the results reveal influencing mechanisms underlying the functioning of the intervention, including multiple objectives, unclear mandates and competing professional logics. The results also reveal variations in processing the intervention focused on differences in using and talking about intervention components. Conclusions: The study indicates there are significant areas of ambiguity in understanding how theory-based complex clinical interventions work and in how interventions are socially constructed and co-created by professionals' experiences, assumptions about own professional practice, contextual conditions and the researchers' intentions. This process evaluation reveals insights into reasons for success or failure and contextual aspects associated with variations in outcomes. Thus, there is a need for further interpretive inquiry, and not only descriptive studies, of the multifaceted characters of complex clinical interventions and how the intervention components are actually shaped in constantly shifting contexts.
|
|
| 7. |
- Hamdan Alshehri, Hanan, et al.
(författare)
-
Attitudes towards death and dying among intensive care professionals: A cross-sectional design evaluating culture-related differential item functioning of the frommelt attitudes toward care of the dying instrument.
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Heliyon. - 2405-8440. ; 9:8
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The objective is to examine whether one of the most used instruments for measuring attitudes towards caring for dying patients, the Frommelt Attitude Toward Care of the Dying (FATCOD-B) instrument, has the same meaning across different societal contexts, as exemplified by Swedish and Saudi Arabian intensive care professionals.A cross-sectional design used the 30-item FATCOD-B questionnaire. It was distributed to intensive care professionals from Sweden and Saudi Arabia, generating a total sample of 227 participants. Ordinal logistic regression models were used to examine the differential item functioning (DIF) for each item.Up to 12 of the 30 items were found to have significant DIF values related to: (a) Swedish and Saudi Arabian intensive care professionals, (b) Swedish and Saudi Arabian registered nurses (RNs), (c) RNs' levels of experience and (d) RNs and other intensive care professionals in Saudi Arabia.The results indicate that FATCOD should be used cautiously when comparing attitudes towards death and dying across different societal and healthcare contexts.
|
|
| 8. |
- Henoch, Ingela, 1956, et al.
(författare)
-
Symptom Distress Profiles in Hospitalized Patients in Sweden: A Cross-Sectional Study.
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Research in nursing & health. - : Wiley. - 1098-240X .- 0160-6891. ; 37:6, s. 512-523
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Symptom distress profiles of patients with a variety of diagnoses at two hospitals in Sweden were examined using a point-prevalence cross-sectional survey design. The sample included 710 patients present on internal medicine, surgery, geriatric, and oncology acute care hospital wards of each hospital on a single day. Symptom distress data were collected via structured interviews using a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS). Fatigue was the most prevalent symptom, experienced by 76.2% of the patients, followed by pain (65.2%) and sleeping difficulties (52.8%). Symptoms were fairly distressing (median NRS 5-6). Patients experiencing high distress from fatigue and pain were more likely to be female, living alone, and to have more symptoms. Latent class analysis revealed three symptom distress profiles that differed with respect to the degree of distress and number of symptoms. The profiles were not substantially differentiated by diagnoses. Symptom distress needs to be assessed and treated on an individual basis, rather than predicting distress levels based on diagnosis alone. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
|
|
| 9. |
- Henoch, Ingela, 1956, et al.
(författare)
-
Symptom distress profiles in hospitalized patients in Sweden—a point prevalence survey
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Quality of life research. 21st Annual Conference of the International Society for Quality of Life Research. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0962-9343 .- 1573-2649.
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Context: Troublesome symptoms are the most common reason for seeking hospital care. Since many patients report multiple symptoms concurrently, symptom research needs to study symptom clusters. There are two conceptual approaches to symptom cluster research: (a) the identification of symptom clusters by investigating associations among different symptom reports; (b) the identification of subgroups of patients that reflect different symptom profiles. Symptom clusters and symptom profiles have been examined in patients with cancer. However, no studies have examined symptom profiles based on patients' self-reported symptom distress in heterogeneous groups of hospitalised patients. Objective: To examine symptom distress profiles of hospitalised patients. Method: Symptom distress data were collected at two hospitals in Sweden via point prevalence surveys using numeric rating scales (NRS) of pain, dyspnoea, fatigue, sleeping difficulties, loss of appetite, depression and anxiety. Patients were grouped according to symptom experience using two approaches: (a) classification of patients with high versus low pain and fatigue distress scores; (b) classification based on a latent class analysis of symptom profiles. Results: In the 710 patients, fatigue (76.2%) and pain (65.3%) were the most prevalent symptoms (median NRS 5 to 6). The group of patients experiencing high fatigue and pain distress were to a greater extent female, living alone and diagnosed with musculoskeletal diseases, and had a higher number of symptoms than the low pain and fatigue group. The latent class analysis revealed three latent classes that differed in ratings and symptom distress profiles. People in the low symptom distress class (LSDC) reported less distress on average than people in medium (MSDC) and high symptom distress classes (HSDC). Compared to LSDC, people in HSDC were more likely to be female and live alone. Latent class membership, reflective of different symptom distress profiles, was not substantially explained by different diagnoses. Conclusions: The majority of patients admitted to hospital experience symptom distress at a level that requires symptom management. Symptom distress is a subjective illness experience and needs to be treated as such, irrespective of diagnosis. Although symptom distress was analysed with two different approaches, the most distressed patients were women who were living alone.
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
