SwePub
Tyck till om SwePub Sök här!
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(Östensson Ellinor)
 

Search: WFRF:(Östensson Ellinor) > Gustavsson Inger M. > Cost-effectiveness ...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Cost-effectiveness analysis of repeated self-sampling for HPV testing in primary cervical screening: a randomized study

Aarnio, Riina, 1971- (author)
Uppsala universitet,Reproduktionsbiologi
Östensson, Ellinor (author)
Karolinska Institutet
Olovsson, Matts, 1958- (author)
Uppsala universitet,Reproduktionsbiologi
show more...
Gustavsson, Inger M. (author)
Uppsala universitet,Science for Life Laboratory, SciLifeLab,Medicinsk genetik och genomik
Gyllensten, Ulf B. (author)
Uppsala universitet,Science for Life Laboratory, SciLifeLab,Medicinsk genetik och genomik
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2020-07-13
2020
English.
In: BMC Cancer. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1471-2407 .- 1471-2407. ; 20:1
  • Journal article (other academic/artistic)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • BackgroundHuman papillomavirus (HPV) testing is recommended in primary cervical screening to improve cancer prevention. An advantage of HPV testing is that it can be performed on self-samples, which could increase population coverage and result in a more efficient strategy to identify women at risk of developing cervical cancer. Our objective was to assess whether repeated self-sampling for HPV testing is cost-effective in comparison with Pap smear cytology for detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or more (CIN2+) in increasing participation rate in primary cervical screening.MethodsA cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) was performed on data from a previously published randomized clinical study including 36 390 women aged 30–49 years. Participants were randomized either to perform repeated self-sampling of vaginal fluid for HPV testing (n = 17 997, HPV self-sampling arm) or to midwife-collected Pap smears for cytological analysis (n = 18 393, Pap smear arm).ResultsSelf-sampling for HPV testing led to 1633 more screened women and 107 more histologically diagnosed CIN2+ at a lower cost vs. midwife-collected Pap smears (€ 228 642 vs. € 781 139). ConclusionsThis study projected that repeated self-sampling for HPV testing increased participation and detection of CIN2+ at a lower cost than midwife-collected Pap smears in primary cervical screening. Offering women a home-based self-sampling may therefore be a more cost-effective alternative than clinic-based screening. 

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Reproduktionsmedicin och gynekologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Self-sampling
HPV testing
primary cervical screening
cost-effectiveness
CIN2
precancerous lesion
cervical cancer
Obstetrik och gynekologi
Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Publication and Content Type

vet (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

  • BMC Cancer (Search for host publication in LIBRIS)

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view