| 1. |
- Ahlqvist-Rastad, Jane, et al.
(författare)
-
Erythropoietin therapy and cancer related anaemia : updated Swedish recommendations
- 2007
-
Ingår i: Medical Oncology. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1357-0560 .- 1559-131X. ; 24:3, s. 267-272
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Due to concerns related to treatment with erythropoietin (EPO) and possible negative effects on tumour control, a workshop was organised by the Medical Products Agency of Sweden with the aim to revise national treatment guidelines if needed. In patients with solid tumours, conflicting results have been reported with respect to tumour control and survival. Until further notice it is therefore recommended that EPO should be used restrictively in the treatment of patients with cancer and that the anticipated improvement in quality of life should be evaluated against potential risks.
|
|
| 2. |
- Chaplin, John, 1955, et al.
(författare)
-
When Do Short Children Realize They Are Short? : Prepubertal Short Children's Perception of Height during 24 Months of Catch-Up Growth Hormone Treatment
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Hormone Research in Paediatrics. - : S. Karger AG. - 1663-2818 .- 1663-2826. ; 77:4, s. 241-249
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aim: To examine perceived height during the first 24 months of growth hormone (GH) treatment in short prepubertal children. Methods: Ninety-nine 3- to 11-year-old short prepubertal children with either isolated GH deficiency (n = 32) or idiopathic short stature (n = 67) participated in a 24-month randomized trial of individualized or fixed-dose GH treatment. Children's and parents' responses to three perceived height measures: relative height (Silhouette Apperception Test), sense of height (VAS short/tall), and judgment of appropriate height (yes/no) were compared to measured height. Results: Children and parents overestimated height at start (72%, 54%) and at 24 months (52%, 30%). Short children described themselves as tall until 8.2 years (girls) and 9 years (boys). Prior to treatment, 38% of children described their height as appropriate and at 3 months, 63%. Mother's height, parental sense of the child's tallness and age explained more variance in children's sense of tallness (34%) than measured height (0%). Conclusion: Short children and parents overestimate height; a pivotal age exists for comparative height judgments. Even a small gain in height may be enough for the child to feel an appropriate age-related height has been reached and to no longer feel short.
|
|
| 3. |
- Decker, Ralph, 1968, et al.
(författare)
-
Decreased GH dose after the catch-up growth period maintains metabolic outcome in short prepubertal children with and without classic GH deficiency
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Clinical endocrinology. - : Wiley. - 0300-0664 .- 1365-2265. ; 77:3, s. 407-15
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: Few studies have evaluated metabolic outcomes following growth hormone (GH) treatment in short prepubertal children during different periods of growth. Previously, we found that individualized GH dosing in the catch-up period reduced the variation in fasting insulin levels by 34% compared with those receiving a standard GH dose. We hypothesized that the GH dose required to maintain beneficial metabolic effects is lower during the prepubertal growth phase after an earlier catch-up growth period. DESIGN: Short prepubertal children with isolated GH deficiency or idiopathic short stature were randomized to individualized GH treatment (range, 17-100 mug/kg/day) or a standard dose in a preceding 2-year study. After achieving near mid-parental height(SDS) (,) children receiving an individualized dose were randomized to either a 50% reduced individualized dose (RID, n=28) or an unchanged individualized dose (UID, n=37) for 2 years. The dose remained unchanged in 33 children initially randomized to receive a standard dose (FIX, 43 mug/kg/day).We evaluated whether the variations in metabolic parameters measured during maintenance growth diminished in RID compared with UID or FIX. RESULTS: We observed less variation in fasting insulin levels (-50%), insulin sensitivity as assessed by homeostasis model assessment (-55.1%), lean soft tissue (-27.8%) and bone mineral content (-31.3%) in RID compared with UID (all p<0.05), but no differences compared with FIX. CONCLUSIONS: Continued individualized GH treatment after the catch-up growth period is safe and reduces hyperinsulinism. Individualized GH dose can be reduced once the desired height(SDS) is achieved to avoid overtreatment in terms of metabolic outcome.
|
|
| 4. |
- Decker, Ralph, 1968, et al.
(författare)
-
GH dose reduction maintains normal prepubertal height velocity after initial catch up growth in short children.
- 2019
-
Ingår i: The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. - : The Endocrine Society. - 1945-7197 .- 0021-972X. ; 104:3, s. 835-844
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- GH responsiveness guides GH dosing during the catch-up growth (CUG) period; however, little is known regarding GH dosing during the prepubertal maintenance treatment period.To evaluate if standard deviation score (SDS) channel parallel growth with normal height velocity can be maintained following CUG by reducing GH dose by 50% in children receiving doses individualized based on estimated GH-responsiveness during the catch-up period.and settings: Prepubertal children (n=98; 72 boys) receiving GH during CUG (GH-deficient (n=33); non-GH-deficient (n=65)), were randomized after 2-3 years to either a 50% reduced individualized (GHRID; n=27; 20 boys) or unchanged individualized dose (GHUID; n=38; 27 boys). Another 33 children (25 boys) continued on a standard weight-based dose, 43 µg/kg/day (GHFIX).The primary endpoint was the proportion of children with ΔheightSDS within ±0.3 at 1 year after GH-dose reduction, versus two control groups: GHUID and GHFIX. The hypothesis was that heightSDS could be maintained within ±0.3 with a reduced individualized GH dose.For the intention-to-treat population at 1 year, 85% of the GHRIDgroup maintained ΔheightSDS within ±0.3 versus 41% in the GHUIDgroup, p=0.0055 and 48% in the GHFIXgroup, p=0.0047. ΔIGF-ISDS in the GHRIDgroup was (mean±SD) -0.75±1.0 at 3 months, p=0.003 and at 1 year -0.72±1.2, compared to the GHUIDgroup 0.15±1.2, p=0.005, and for the GHFIXgroup 0.05±1.0, p=0.02.Channel parallel growth, i.e. normal height velocity, and IGFSDS levels within ±2 were maintained after completed CUG using a 50% lower individualized dose than used during the CUG period.
|
|
| 5. |
- Glimelius, Bengt, et al.
(författare)
-
Adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer: a joint analysis of randomised trials by the Nordic Gastrointestinal Tumour Adjuvant Therapy Group
- 2005
-
Ingår i: Acta Oncol. - : Informa UK Limited. - 0284-186X .- 1651-226X. ; 44:8, s. 904-12
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Due to uncertainties regarding clinically meaningful gains from adjuvant chemotherapy after colorectal cancer surgery, several Nordic Groups in the early 1990s initiated randomised trials to prove or reject such gains. This report gives the joint analyses after a minimum 5-year follow-up. Between October 1991 and December 1997, 2 224 patients under 76 years of age with colorectal cancer stages II and III were randomised to surgery alone (n = 1 121) or adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 1 103) which varied between trials (5FU/levamisole for 12 months, n = 444; 5FU/leucovorin for 4-5 months according to either a modified Mayo Clinic schedule (n = 262) or the Nordic schedule (n = 397). Some centres also randomised patients treated with 5FU/leucovorin to+/-levamisole). A total of 812 patients had colon cancer stage II, 708 colon cancer stage III, 323 rectal cancer stage II and 368 rectal cancer stage III. All analyses were according to intention-to-treat. No statistically significant difference in overall survival, stratified for country or region, could be found in any group of patients according to stage or site. In colon cancer stage III, an absolute difference of 7% (p = 0.15), favouring chemotherapy, was seen. The present analyses corroborate a small but clinically meaningful survival gain from adjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer stage III, but not in the other presentations.
|
|
| 6. |
- Kriström, Berit, et al.
(författare)
-
Growth hormone (GH) dosing during catch-up growth guided by individual responsiveness decreases growth response variability in prepubertal children with GH deficiency or idiopathic short stature
- 2009
-
Ingår i: Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. - : The Endocrine Society. - 0021-972X .- 1945-7197. ; 94:2, s. 483-490
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- CONTEXT: Weight-based GH dosing results in a wide variation in growth response in children with GH deficiency (GHD) or idiopathic short stature (ISS). OBJECTIVE: The hypothesis tested was whether individualized GH doses, based on variation in GH responsiveness estimated by a prediction model, reduced variability in growth response around a set height target compared with a standardized weight-based dose. SETTING: A total of 153 short prepubertal children diagnosed with isolated GHD or ISS (n = 43) and at least 1 SD score (SDS) below midparental height SDS (MPH(SDS)) were included in this 2-yr multicenter study. INTERVENTION: The children were randomized to either a standard (43 microg/kg.d) or individualized (17-100 microg/kg.d) GH dose. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: We measured the deviation of height(SDS) from individual MPH(SDS) (diffMPH(SDS)). The primary endpoint was the difference in the range of diffMPH(SDS) between the two groups. RESULTS: The diffMPH(SDS) range was reduced by 32% in the individualized-dose group relative to the standard-dose group (P < 0.003), whereas the mean diffMPH(SDS) was equal: -0.42 +/- 0.46 and -0.48 +/- 0.67, respectively. Gain in height(SDS) 0-2 yr was equal for the GH-deficient and ISS groups: 1.31 +/- 0.47 and 1.36 +/- 0.47, respectively, when ISS was classified on the basis of maximum GH peak on the arginine-insulin tolerance test or 24-h profile. CONCLUSION: Individualized GH doses during catch-up growth significantly reduce the proportion of unexpectedly good and poor responders around a predefined individual growth target and result in equal growth responses in children with GHD and ISS.
|
|
