| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Lundgren, Fredrik, et al.
(author)
-
PTFE bypass to below-knee arteries : distal vein collar or not? A prospective randomised multicentre study
- 2010
-
In: European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. - : Elsevier BV. - 1078-5884 .- 1532-2165. ; 39:6, s. 747-754
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BackgroundPatency and limb salvage after synthetic bypass to the arteries below-knee are inferior to that which can be achieved with autologous vein. Use of a vein collar at the distal anastomosis has been suggested to improve patency and limb salvage, a problem that is analysed in this randomised clinical study.MethodsPatients with critical limb ischaemia undergoing polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) bypass to below-knee arteries were randomly either assigned a vein collar or not in two groups – bypass to the popliteal artery below-knee (femoro-popliteal below-knee (FemPopBK)) and more distal bypass (femoro-distal bypass (FemDist)). Follow-up was scheduled until amputation, death or at most 5 years, whichever event occurred first.ResultsIn the FemPopBK and in the FemDist groups, 115/202 and 72/150 were randomised to have a vein collar, respectively. Information was available for 345 of 352 randomised patients (98%).At 3 years, primary patency was 26% (95% confidence interval (CI) 18–38) with a vein collar and 43 (33–58) without a vein collar for femoro-popliteal bypass and 20 (11–38), and 17 (9–33) for femoro-distal bypass, respectively. The corresponding figures for limb salvage were 64 (54–75) and 61 (50–74) for femoro-popliteal bypass, and 59 (46–76) and 44 (32–61) for femoro-distal bypass with and without a vein collar, respectively. Log-rank-test for the whole Kaplan–Meier life table curve showed no statistically significant differences with or without vein collar primary patency: p = 0.0853, p = 0.228; secondary patency: p = 0.317, p = 0.280; limb salvage: p = 0.757, p = 0.187 for FemPopBK and FemDist, respectively. The use of a vein collar did not influence patency or limb salvage.ConclusionThis study failed to show any benefit for vein collar with PTFE bypass to a below-knee artery.
|
|
| 5. |
- Svensson, M Y, et al.
(author)
-
[Nerve cell damages in whiplash injuries. Animal experimental studies] : Nervenzellschäden bei Schleudertraumen. Tierexperimentelle Untersuchungen.
- 1998
-
In: Der Orthopäde. - 0085-4530. ; 27:12, s. 820-6
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Mechanical loading of the cervical spine during car accidents often lead to a number of neck injury symptoms with the common term Whiplash Associated Disorders (WAD). Several of these symptoms could possibly be explained by injuries to the cervical spinal nerve root region. It was hypothesised that the changes in the inner volume of the cervical spinal canal during neck extension-flexion motion would cause transient pressure changes in the CNS as a result of hydro-dynamic effects, and thereby mechanically load the nerve roots and cause tissue damage. To test the hypothesis, anaesthetised pigs were exposed to experimental neck trauma in the extension, flexion and lateral flexion modes. The severity of the trauma was kept below the level where cervical fractures occur. Transient pressure pulses in the cervical spinal canal were duly recorded. Signs of cell membrane dysfunction were found in the nerve cell bodies of the cervical spinal ganglia. Ganglion injuries may explain some of the symptoms associated with soft-tissue neck injuries in car accidents. When the pig's head was pulled rearward relative to its torso to resemble a rear-end collision situation, it was found that ganglion injuries occurred very early on in the neck motion, at the stage where the motion changes from retraction to extension motion. Ganglion injuries did not occur when pigs were exposed to similar static loading of the neck. This indicates that these injuries are a result of dynamic phenomena and thereby further supports the pressure hypothesis. A Neck Injury Criterion (NIC) based on a theoretical model of the pressure effects was developed. It indicated that it was the differential horizontal acceleration and velocity between the head and the upper torso at the point of maximum neck retraction that determined the risk of ganglion injuries.
|
|
