SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Utökad sökning

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Alkan Olsson Johanna) ;hsvcat:5"

Sökning: WFRF:(Alkan Olsson Johanna) > Samhällsvetenskap

  • Resultat 1-10 av 75
Sortera/gruppera träfflistan
   
NumreringReferensOmslagsbildHitta
1.
  •  
2.
  • Alkan Olsson, Ilhami, et al. (författare)
  • Linking International Human Rights Law to Policy in Protecting against Adverse Effects of Climate Change
  • 2016
  • Ingår i: TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin. - : ScopeMed. - 1303-734X. ; 15:6, s. 556-568
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • The article aims to illustrate the multifaceted interlink between climate change, heat, and human rights and discuss in what ways international human rights law may be used to support the development and implementation of policy at various levels to limit adverse effects of climate change on humans in general and right to health in particular. This is done by overviewing the possibilities and limits international law offers and displays in the fields of the environment, climate change and heat. Moreover, through emphasising the inter-linkages between international law and domestic law and policy, the article sets out how and by what means international human rights law is and may be incorporated and used in national law and policy-making in the area of climate change. The article concludes that human rights norms and principles could be used to promote a right-based national climate change regime in six different ways.
  •  
3.
  •  
4.
  • Alkan Olsson, Johanna, et al. (författare)
  • Turkey’s signature of the Kyoto protocol
  • 2012
  • Ingår i: İstanbul Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi. - 1303-1260. ; :47, s. 1-30
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • In May 2004 Turkey became a party to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. In February 2009, in a time when the Protocol’s first commitment period comes to an end, Turkey also became a party to the Kyoto Protocol. The aim of this article is twofold: first, to identify the diverse factors that lie behind Turkey’s late ratification of the Kyoto Protocol, and second, to discuss in which way Turkey’s case confirms theoretical explanations regarding ratifications of international agreements. The empirical material of this article consist of interviews with some of the prevailing actors in the climate change policy area in Turkey, websites of the relevant ministries, parliamentary discussions, and the media. The article shows that while the perceived economic cost of the Protocol was the most important reason for Turkey to refrain signing it until 2009, the expected profit of the European Union membership appears as being the single most important cause for Turkey’s change of position. The article agrees that although the theories of international environmental agreements are complementary rather than mutually exclusive it nevertheless contends that the institutionalist theory offers a more encompassing explanation as to why Turkey has joined the Kyoto Protocol.
  •  
5.
  • Lingegård, Sofia, et al. (författare)
  • Sustainable public procurement in large infrastructure projects—policy implementation for carbon emission reductions
  • 2021
  • Ingår i: Sustainability. - : MDPI AG. - 2071-1050. ; 13:20
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • The infrastructure construction sector is a significant source of carbon emissions, and more stringent procurement requirements are central to meeting reduction targets in this demand-led and project-based industry. This paper aims to analyze the implementation of international policies for reducing carbon emissions in infrastructure construction, focusing on the interaction between policy ambitions and procurement practices. Based on case studies of large projects and their contexts in five countries worldwide: Australia, the Netherlands, Sweden, the UK, and the US, a cross-country comparison is performed of how policies and practices for carbon reduction develop across multiple implementation levels. Three levels are included in the analysis: policy, industry, and project level. We identify the projects as either drivers of policy goals, frontrunners in industry-level development processes, or translators of national policy. These roles, and the associated pathways for carbon emission reduction, are context-specific and depend on the policy ambitions at the national or regional level, the maturity of the supplier market, and, often, on the strategies of individual champions at the project level. Long-term learning processes, both within and between the various levels, are essential for advancing carbon reduction.
  •  
6.
  • von Post, Maria, et al. (författare)
  • The Swedish green infrastructure policy as a policy assemblage : What does it do for biodiversity conservation?
  • 2023
  • Ingår i: People and Nature. - : Wiley. - 2575-8314. ; 5:2, s. 839-851
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Green infrastructure (GI) is increasingly used in policymaking to promote biodiversity and enhance ecosystem services through the protection, creation, restoration and connection of natural and man-made green areas. The EU Commission adopted in 2013, the concept as a strategy. When member states apply the policy, it is translated into specific bureaucratic and political systems, creating different ‘policy assemblages’ of ideas and institutional features. We analyse the Swedish GI policy to draw conclusions about how it has been assembled in one particular member state and what that particular assemblage will imply for biodiversity conservation. In combination with understanding policies as assemblages, we use the ‘What's the problem represented to be’-approach as method. We show that the Swedish GI policy assemblage consists of a mix of policy ideas developed in Sweden and the EU. Despite the current strong focus on biodiversity conservation, the notion of land's multifunctionality, characterizing the EU strategy and the possibility to conserve biodiversity on land used for purposes other than conservation increasingly influence the Swedish policy as it is formed. Although the policy has the potential to mainstream biodiversity conservation measures across different sectors, based on our analysis of current discourse, its implementation will likely promote GI measures less disruptive to existing land use activities, making its capacity to halt biodiversity loss marginal. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
  •  
7.
  •  
8.
  • Dänhardt, Juliana, et al. (författare)
  • Ekologiska fokusarealer i samverkan : Utvärdering av effekter på ekosystemtjänster, jordbruk och administration
  • 2017
  • Rapport (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
    • I den här studien utvärderar vi konsekvenserna av så kallat gemensamt genomförande av ekologiska fokusarealer enlig artikel 46:5 och 46:6 i EU:s direktstödsförordning. Genom bredare analyser beaktar vi även andra former av samverkan och justerade skötselvillkor. Att främja sammanhängande områden med ekologiskt fokus är en del av EU:s satsning på grön infrastruktur. Sverige tillämpar inte gemensamt genomförande i dagsläget. Ekologisk-ekonomisk modellering, workshop med jordbrukare och intervjuer med tjänstemän ligger till grund för studiens resultat. Fokus i våra analyser är effekter på pollinering och biologisk skadedjursbekämpning, båda ekosystemtjänster till nytta för jordbruket.Jordbrukare positiva till samverkan, tjänstemän befarar högre kostnaderGenerellt är de medverkande jordbrukarna positiva till samverkan. Tydligare och mer konkret koppling mellan godkända fokusarealer, skötselvillkor och miljönytta behövs dock för att skapa acceptans hos jordbrukarna. Tjänstemän med erfarenhet av samverkan är generellt positiva, medan personer utan erfarenhet är mer tveksamma. På svenska myndigheter befaras ökade transaktionskostnader, trots att fungerande exempel på samverkan i Europa finns. Vi rekommenderar att inspiration och kunskap hämtas från dessa lyckade exempel.Små miljöeffekter med dagens fokusarealerAtt med dagens regelverk införa gemensamt genomförande av ekologiska fokusarealer ger små miljöeffekter. Miljöeffekten förblir svag eftersom möjligheten att välja fokusarealer med låg miljöeffekt kvarstår, och eftersom generösa viktningsfaktorer minskar den faktiskt avsatta arealen av fokusarealer med högre miljönytta. Dessutom finns incitament att placera fokusarealerna på lågproduktiv mark, där behovet av fokusarealer som gynnar ekosystemtjänster är lägre. I dag godkänns också fokusarealer som ingår i det normala brukandet, vilket skapar dödvikt. Våra modeller visar att möjligheten till samverkan inte löser dessa problem.Bättre miljöeffekt med rätt fokusarealer och krav på kvalitetFör att uppnå en bättre miljöeffekt behövs en utformning av reglerna som premierar de mest miljöeffektiva fokusarealerna. Först och främst bör menyn av fokusarealer innehålla miljöeffektiva åtgärder. Dessutom bör viktningssystemet omvärderas så att den mest effektiva fokusarealen används som referens. Slutligen bör placeringen av ekologiska fokusarealer göras i ett landskapsperspektiv för att säkerställa fokusarealernas bidrag till grön infrastruktur. På gårdsnivå bör fokusarealerna genom information och rådgivning styras till platser där potentialen för miljönytta är störst, exempelvis intill grödor som gynnas av pollinering och biologisk skadedjursbekämpning. Ett effektivt sätt att gynna just dessa ekosystemtjänster vore att begränsa menyn av valbara fokusarealer till träda och obrukade fältkanter och samtidigt ha krav på att så in blommande växter.
  •  
9.
  • Nilsson, Lovisa, et al. (författare)
  • A suboptimal array of options erodes the value of CAP ecological focus areas
  • 2019
  • Ingår i: Land Use Policy. - : Elsevier BV. - 0264-8377 .- 1873-5754. ; 85, s. 407-418
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • As a part of the greening of the EU's Common Agricultural Policy in 2013, Ecological Focus Areas (EFA) became mandatory for many European farmers, with the aim to enhance on-farm biodiversity. However, their effects on biodiversity have been disputed. In this interdisciplinary effort, we assessed the effects of current and alternative formulations of EFA regulations in Sweden. By complementing economic and ecological modelling with interviews with persons at administrative and advisory bodies and a narrative decision game with farmers, we were able to demonstrate key shortcomings of mandatory EFAs as a policy instrument. In particular, we evaluated if requirements to increase the quality of EFAs and regulations allowing their collective implementation, have the potential to increase their effectiveness in benefitting functional biodiversity. We focused on how biodiversity underpinning crop pollination and natural pest control would be affected by alternative regulations. First, we show that several of the possible EFA measures have no or minimal actual effect on biodiversity. Second, we demonstrate the need for appropriate incentives for farmers to choose and place agri-environmental measures in an environmentally desirable way. The EFA regulation is experienced as complicated and without any clear environmental benefits for the participants in this study. As a result, the confidence in the policy is undermined. Third, we demonstrate the challenge of devising compulsory measures to improve biodiversity that also need to fulfil demands on being flexible and easy to administrate. Our results indicate that the latter goal has taken precedence over the former, and thus providing an explanation of the poor design of the EFA regulation from a biodiversity perspective. We argue that to enhance biodiversity in farmland through general agri-environmental measures, only measures with clear benefits for biodiversity can be on the menu. Further, better information as well as incentives for optimizing EFA placement for biodiversity on farms are needed and combined with stricter rules on quality and placement where appropriate.
  •  
10.
  • van Ittersum, Martin, et al. (författare)
  • Integrated Assessment of Agricultural and Environmental Policies – A Modular Framework for the EU (SEAMLESS)
  • 2008
  • Ingår i: Agricultural Systems. - : Elsevier BV. - 0308-521X. ; 96:1-3, s. 150-165
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Abstract in UndeterminedAgricultural systems continuously evolve and are forced to change as a result of a range of global and local driving forces. Agricultural technologies and agricultural, environmental and rural development policies are increasingly designed to contribute to the sustainability of agricultural systems and to enhance contributions of agricultural systems to sustainable development at large. The effectiveness and efficiency of such policies and technological developments in realizing desired contributions could be greatly enhanced if the quality of their ex-ante assessments were improved. Four key challenges and requirements to make research tools more useful for integrated assessment in the European Union were defined in interactions between scientists and the European Commission (EC), i.e., overcoming the gap between micro-macro level analysis, the bias in integrated assessments towards either economic or environmental issues, the poor re-use of models and hindrances in technical linkage of models. Tools for integrated assessment must have multi-scale capabilities and preferably be generic and flexible such that they can deal with a broad variety of policy questions. At the same time, to be useful for scientists, the framework must facilitate state-of-the-art science both on aspects of the agricultural systems and on integration. This paper presents the rationale, design and illustration of a component-based framework for agricultural systems (SEAMLESS Integrated Framework) to assess, ex-ante, agricultural and agri-environmental policies and technologies across a range of scales, from field-farm to region and European Union, as well as some global interactions. We have opted for a framework to link individual model and data components and a software infrastructure that allows a flexible (re-)use and linkage of components. The paper outlines the software infrastructure, indicators and model and data components. The illustrative example assesses effects of a trade liberalisation proposal on EU's agriculture and indicates how SEAMLESS addresses the four identified challenges for integrated assessment tools, i.e., linking micro and macro analysis, assessing economic, environmental, social and institutional indicators, (re-)using standalone model components for field, farm and market analysis and their conceptual and technical linkage.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Resultat 1-10 av 75
Typ av publikation
tidskriftsartikel (32)
rapport (13)
konferensbidrag (11)
annan publikation (5)
bokkapitel (5)
bok (3)
visa fler...
samlingsverk (redaktörskap) (2)
forskningsöversikt (2)
proceedings (redaktörskap) (1)
doktorsavhandling (1)
visa färre...
Typ av innehåll
refereegranskat (42)
övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt (30)
populärvet., debatt m.m. (3)
Författare/redaktör
Alkan Olsson, Johann ... (71)
Hanson, Helena (12)
Svensson, Måns (8)
Koch, Max (7)
Bohgard, Mats (6)
Brogaard, Sara (6)
visa fler...
Jonsson, Anna (6)
Van Ittersum, Martin (6)
Lundqvist, Peter (5)
Knaggård, Åsa (5)
Albin, Maria (5)
Ewert, Frank (5)
Andersson, Lotta (5)
Bezlepkina, Irina (4)
Larsson, Stefan (3)
Persson, Erik (3)
Smith, Henrik G. (3)
Nyström, Birgitta (3)
Clough, Yann (3)
Alkan Olsson, Ilhami (3)
Therond, Olivier (3)
Arheimer, Berit (3)
Öberg, Gunilla (3)
Bäcklund, Ann-Katrin (3)
Lundmark, Linda (3)
De Kaminski, Marcin (3)
Brady, Mark (3)
Sjöholm, Carina (3)
Vareman, Niklas (3)
Rönkkö, Kari (3)
Mccormick, Kes (2)
Ekroos, Johan (2)
Malmqvist, Ebba (2)
Olsson, Peter (2)
Gabrielsson, Sara (2)
Thoni, Terese (2)
Wamsler, Christine (2)
Nilsson, Lovisa (2)
Olsson, Lennart (2)
Jakobsson, Kristina (2)
Uppenberg, Stefan (2)
Tinnerberg, Håkan (2)
Bockstaller, Christi ... (2)
Knapen, Rob (2)
Turpin, Nadine (2)
Queste, Jerome (2)
Zelli, Fariborz (2)
Wilhelmsson, Fredrik (2)
Dänhardt, Juliana (2)
Jonsson, Anna, 1967- (2)
visa färre...
Lärosäte
Lunds universitet (60)
Linköpings universitet (12)
Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet (5)
Göteborgs universitet (3)
Naturvårdsverket (3)
Chalmers tekniska högskola (3)
visa fler...
Malmö universitet (2)
Blekinge Tekniska Högskola (2)
Högskolan Kristianstad (1)
Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan (1)
Örebro universitet (1)
Högskolan i Borås (1)
Karlstads universitet (1)
visa färre...
Språk
Engelska (58)
Svenska (17)
Forskningsämne (UKÄ/SCB)
Naturvetenskap (25)
Lantbruksvetenskap (5)
Teknik (4)
Medicin och hälsovetenskap (2)

År

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy