| 1. |
- Camuffo, I, et al.
(författare)
-
Concepts definition
- 2009
-
Rapport (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 2. |
- Camuffo, I, et al.
(författare)
-
State of the art and eVALUE scope
- 2008
-
Rapport (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- eVALUE will address the real function of ICT-based safety systems and their capability to perform the function through two courses of action: defining and quantifying the function output to be achieved by the safety system and developing the testing and evaluation methods for the ICT-based safety systems. The safety systems within the eVALUE scope are classified into four clusters: longitudinal, lateral and yaw/stability. The fourth cluster remains open for upcoming systems. Based on market availability and penetration rate, the consortium decided to focus on eight preventive or mitigating safety systems: ACC, FCW and CM by braking, in the longitudinal assistance domain; BSD, LDW and LKA, in the lateral assistance domain; and finally, ABS and ESC, in the yaw/stability assistance domain. Following the description of current test and evaluation methods, sensor technologies, system function output and ECUs globally applicable to ICT based safety systems, the report covers these technologies and components for the eight selected systems in detail. As a next step to this deliverable and according to the work plan, concepts for design reviews, physical vehicle testing as well as laboratory testing will be analysed. The result will be an in-depth understanding of the possibilities to investigate and evaluate the eight active safety systems within the first phase of the project. The different concepts will then support the decision about the development of the testing and evaluation methods that are able to point out the safety benefit of those systems in the most representative way.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Andersson-Sköld, Yvonne, 1957-, et al.
(författare)
-
Att värdera ekosystemtjänster
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Gröna Fakta från Utemiljö. - Landvetter : Marietorp förlag. - 0284-9798. ; :8 / 2017, s. I-VIII
-
Forskningsöversikt (populärvet., debatt m.m.)abstract
- Begreppet ekosystemtjänster används allt oftare och värdet av ekosystemtjänsterna ska, enligt Naturvårdsverkets etappmål, vara allmänt kända och integrerade i olika ställningstaganden och beslut senast 2018. Här förklaras begreppet i korthet och några tips om hur det kan implementeras i kommuner ges. Därefter beskriver forskarna Yvonne Andersson-Sköld och Jenny Klingberg ett forskningsprojekt som de har deltagit i och vars resultat är en handbok om hur ekosystemtjänster kan värderas.
|
|
| 5. |
- Ryan, Jean, et al.
(författare)
-
Accessibility and space-time differences in when and how different groups (choose to) travel
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Journal of Transport Geography. - : Elsevier. - 0966-6923 .- 1873-1236. ; 111, s. 103665-103665
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- A fair distribution of accessibility to key activities is a central concern for distributive justice in transport planning. This implies that disparities in accessibility and the negative effects associated with a lack of accessibility should be mitigated. However, even though accessibility is not purely spatial or static, it is conventionally treated as if it were. Several studies have significantly advanced the spatio-temporal representation of accessibility. However, there is still a lack of focus on how these dynamics affect different groups of people with differing socio-economic and demographic characteristics and how these dynamics might influence their travel mode choice. The aim of this paper is to analyse how differences in accessibility to the workplace by public transport during multiple times of the day are associated with the time period in which different groups of people commute to work, and how the flexibility of individuals' time constraints might influence whether they can and do commute using public transport. Using a transport justice-focused time geography perspective, this study draws on the spatio-temporal aspects of people's real activities based on travel survey data for the Stockholm Region. This study contributes to the literature by highlighting the differences in accessibility to the workplace by public transport across multiple departure time periods; showing how these results compare with mode choice (if there is a choice); and revealing which socio-economic, demographic and geographical factors characterise these differences. This study also illustrates how a transport justice-focused time geography approach could help researchers have a more detailed and nuanced understanding of the relationship between accessibility and sustainable travel behaviour, and how this relationship might change at different times of the day.
|
|
