| 1. |
- Getz, Donald, 1949, et al.
(författare)
-
The value of festivals
- 2019
-
Ingår i: The Routledge Handbook of Festivals/ Mair, Judith (university Of Queensland (redaktör/utgivare). - Abingdon : Routledge. - 9781138735811 - 9781315186320 ; , s. 22-30
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Armbrecht, John, et al.
(författare)
-
Experience quality, satisfaction, perceived value behavioral intentions in an event context
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Session Proceedings. 26th Nordic Symposium of Tourism and Hospitality Research, October 4-6 2017, Falun, Sweden.
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- Quality is central to understand consumer behavior. In an event context Andersson, Armbrecht & Lundberg (2015) found that production quality and service quality determine satisfaction which determines the use value of event experiences and consumer expenditures at an event. Otto & Ritchie (1996) advocate a consumer perspective and propose that quality of a service and quality of an experience must be evaluated to understand the true nature of satisfaction. Researchers have engaged in developing scales for measuring these concepts during the last decade. Particularly the affective responses to experiences has been in focus to provide the experience and event industry with a deeper insight into aspects which might result in consumer immersion (Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, 2014), arousal (Bigné et al., 2005; Holbrook & Hirschman, 1982) and extraordinary experiences (Abrahams, 1986; Arnould & Price, 1993). Few studies have however combined measures of affective and functional aspects into larger measurement models to predict satisfaction, value, intentions and behavior. This study measures affective and hedonic aspects of event experiences and to what extent they explain consumer value. Results indicate that affective and functional aspects are important. An interesting difference is that affective aspects are more likely to influence consumer satisfaction while functional aspects predict intentional behavior such as the likeliness to recommend the event to friends and family. Session: Advances in Event Management Research
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
-
Event Impact
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism. - 1502-2250 .- 1502-2269. ; 16:2
-
Annan publikation (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 6. |
- Getz, Donald, 1949, et al.
(författare)
-
A synthesis, summaries and some ontological propositions
- 2017
-
Ingår i: The value of events / edited by Erik Lundberg, John Armbrecht, Tommy D. Andersson and Donald Getz.. - Abingdon : Routledge. - 9781138678415 ; , s. 181-199
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 7. |
- Getz, Donald, 1949, et al.
(författare)
-
Definitions and meanings of value
- 2017
-
Ingår i: The Value of Events. - Abingdon : Routledge. - 9781317193241 ; , s. 1-9
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 8. |
- Getz, Donald, et al.
(författare)
-
Analyzing whole populations of festivals and events: an application of organizational ecology
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Journal of Policy Research in Tourism Leisure and Events. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1940-7963 .- 1940-7971. ; 8:3, s. 249-273
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In this conceptual paper, we draw upon organizational ecology theory to develop a rationale, measures and methods for analyzing whole populations of festivals and events. We employ literature review and the extension of existing theory to event studies. There is considerable scope for gaining better understanding of festivals (and other permanent or periodic events) and their management through application of measures of population dynamics and a number of key constructs from organizational ecology. We conclude by suggesting a research strategy and outlining specific measures and methods that should be applied to whole-population analysis. Policy implications are discussed for cities, destinations, and organizations that are involved with multiple events, including the necessity for inter-organizational collaboration in research, defining shared goals, and measuring impacts.
|
|
| 9. |
- Andersson, Tommy D., 1947, et al.
(författare)
-
Factors Influencing Grant and Sponsorship Revenue for Festivals
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Event Management. - 1525-9951. ; 17:3, s. 195-212
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This article contributes to event management theory and practice, and more generally to sponsorship research, by examining grant and sponsorship revenue for festivals. In particular, a number of factors that appear to influence the amounts and sources of external revenues are examined for significant differences. Data obtained from 260 festival managers in Australia, Norway, Sweden, and UK are compared with respect to their events’ revenue sources, ownership, and other factors thought to influence revenue. Statistical tests reveal that festival size (i.e., attendance), professionalism (as measured by staff members), and the “fit” between event and sponsor (as measured by type of event correlated with different sponsors and grant sources) significantly affect festival revenue. It is argued in the conclusion that by applying certain strategies festival managers can enhance their external revenue generation and support. Future research needs and theory development are discussed in the conclusions, focused on a new set of propositions derived from the analysis.
|
|
| 10. |
- Andersson, Tommy D., 1947, et al.
(författare)
-
The use and non-use values of events: a conceptual framework for event evaluation
- 2014
-
Ingår i: The 23 r d Nordic Symposium On Tourism And Hospitality Research. THE VALUES OF TOURISM 2-4 October 2014. Köpenhamn, Danmark..
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- An important focus of current research has involved the holisti c assessment of event impacts, including social, cultu ral and environmental impacts a s well as economic impacts. Events create externali ties that can be understood wit h the help of concepts such as Use and Non‐use values. To date, these concepts have been de veloped and applied primarily within environmental economics as comprising what eco nomists call 'total economic value'. They have been u sed to understand the benefits and costs that occur both for users of natural resources and for non‐users, i.e. ind ividuals that are affected by positive or negative externaliti es linked to, for example, the preservation of natural resources. They have also been e stablished within cultural econ omics to understand the values created by, for example, cultural institutions and art. A more recent development has been the application of Use and Non‐use values in the conte xts of events and festivals. The link between cultural instit utions and events can be establ ished by the cultural content of many events and festivals. However, the adoption of these concepts can also be linked to the notion that events have wider societal impacts, b eyond economic impacts or the financial injection of new money. The aim of this paper is to conceptualize Use and Non‐use value s in an event context. A literature review of the definit ions and applications within th e fields of environmental and cultural economics will be t he basis for the conceptualizat ion, as well as the recent applications in the event context. The conceptual framework pro vides a view on value creation of events, including bo th visitors (users) and local r esidents (non‐users). Use values are discussed in terms of direct and indirect use value which can be linked to different aspects of the event e xperience by participants, visi tors and destination residents. Non‐use values, on th e other hand, are discussed in terms of option value , bequest value , stewardship , altruistic value , and existence value and how these values can (if at all possible) be related to a wider group of event stake holders. The paper contributes an alternative perspective on event evaluation comp ared to standard approaches. This perspective also provides a fertile agenda for more detailed research on the role and importance of diffe rent types of values in event a ssessment.
|
|
