| 1. |
- Dieroff Hay, Susanne, et al.
(författare)
-
Starta ett digitalt centrum för cancerrehabilitering
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Dagens medicin. Oberoende nyhetstidning för hela sjukvården. - Stockholm : Dagens Medicin. - 1402-1943. ; :3 juli
-
Tidskriftsartikel (populärvet., debatt m.m.)
|
|
| 2. |
- Bergh, Jonas C. S., et al.
(författare)
-
Docetaxel, trastuzumab, pertuzumab versus trastuzumab emtansine as neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer : results from the Swedish PREDIX HER2 trial identifying a new potential de-escalation standard?
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Journal of Clinical Oncology. - : American Society of Clinical Oncology. - 0732-183X .- 1527-7755. ; 37:15, s. 501-501
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: Neoadjuvant therapy produces high rates of pathological complete response (pCR) and is the standard of care in HER2 positive breast cancer; however, the optimal treatment regimen remains to be established. Methods: In this randomized phase II study patients ≥18 years with HER2 positive breast cancer > 20mm or verified lymph node metastases were randomized to 6 courses of docetaxel, trastuzumab and pertuzumab (DTP, group A) or trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1, group B), q 21 days. The protocol allowed switch to the competing treatment upon lack of response or drug-related severe toxicity. Patients received postoperative epirubicin+cyclophosphamide, trastuzumab for a total of one year and endocrine therapy. Accrual was completed in October 2018 after randomization of 202 patients, data on pCR were available for 190 at the time for this abstract submission. Median age, 52 years (26-74), menopausal status, histological type and grade were well balanced between the treatment groups. 62.6% of the tumors were hormone receptor (HR) positive. Results: Primary endpoint was pathological objective response. 190 patients completed the protocol-specified preoperative treatment. pCR was achieved in 45.3% of patients, 46.4% in patients treated with DTP and 44.1% with T-DM1 (chi-sq., p = 0.75). In HR-positive tumors, pCR was obtained in 35.3% of patients, 35.9% in group A vs. 34.6% in group B (p = 0.87); in HR-negative tumors, the overall pCR rate was 62.0%, 66.7% in group A vs. 57.9% in group B (p = 0.45). Severe (grade 3/4) toxicity was reported at 68 occasions related to DTP, compared with 16 related to T-DM1, 26 vs. 3 caused by febrile neutropenia. Significantly better quality of life was reported by patients treated with T-DM1. Conclusions: Our data on TDM-1 demonstrates similar efficacy and less toxicity, in particular for patients with HER2 and HR positive cancers, being a potential new standard for neoadjuvant therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02568839.
|
|
| 3. |
- Brandberg, Yvonne, et al.
(författare)
-
Health-related quality of life in the Swedish PREDIX HER2 trial, evaluating docetaxel, trastuzumab, pertuzumab versus trastuzumab emtansine as neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer.
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Journal of Clinical Oncology. - : American Society of Clinical Oncology. - 0732-183X .- 1527-7755. ; 37:15, s. 583-583
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: Neoadjuvant therapy combining docetaxel, trastuzumab and pertuzumab (DTP) was compared to trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in the randomized phase 2 PREDIX HER2 trial. Patients, ≥18 years with HER2 positive breast cancer, ≥20mm or with verified lymph node metastases, were randomized to six courses of DTP (Standard arm) or T-DM1 (Experimental arm). Primary endpoint was pathological objective response to primary medical therapy at post-treatment surgery. Health related quality of life (HRQoL) was a secondary outcome, and is of specific interest as there was no difference between the randomization groups regarding the main endpoint (results presented in a separate abstract sent to ASCO 2019, Bergh et al.). Methods: Of 202 randomized patients, 190 are available for evaluation at this point. HRQoL was measured, using EORTC QLQ-C30 + EORTC QLQ-BR23, at baseline before randomization and after six courses. Results: No differences between the randomization arms were found at baseline. Results after six courses, based on 163 patients (86%) and adjusted to baseline values, revealed statistical significant differences (p≤0.01), favoring the experimental T-DM1 arm on 7 out of 15 of the EORTC QLQ-C30 variables (Physical functioning, Role functioning, Social functioning, Global quality of Life, Fatigue, Dyspnea, and Diarrhea). For the breast cancer specific questionnaire (EORTC-BR23), the experimental arm scored statistically significantly better on 5 out of 7 subscales (Body image, Sexual functioning, Sexual enjoyment, Systemic therapy side effects and Upset by hair loss). All of the statistical significant differences were of moderate or large clinical significance (≥10 scale scores). No differences between the randomization arms were found for the remaining HRQoL variables. Conclusions: The experimental arm reported better HRQoL than the control arm after six courses. Trastuzumab emtansine may be a useful treatment alternative due to better HRQoL and lower toxicity. Clinical trial information: NCT02568839.
|
|
| 4. |
- Hatschek, Thomas, et al.
(författare)
-
Neoadjuvant Trastuzumab, Pertuzumab, and Docetaxel vs Trastuzumab Emtansine in Patients With ERBB2-Positive Breast Cancer A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial
- 2021
-
Ingår i: JAMA Oncology. - : American Medical Association. - 2374-2437 .- 2374-2445. ; 7:9, s. 1360-1367
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- IMPORTANCE: Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is presently approved for treatment of advanced breast cancer and after incomplete response to neoadjuvant therapy, but the potential of T-DM1 as monotherapy is so far unknown.OBJECTIVE: To assess pathologic complete response (pCR) to standard neoadjuvant therapy of combination docetaxel, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab (DTP) vs T-DM1 monotherapy in patients with ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-positive breast cancer.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized phase 2 trial, conducted at 9 sites in Sweden, enrolled 202 patients between December 1, 2014, and October 31, 2018. Participants were 18 years or older, with ERBB2-positive tumors larger than 20 mm and/or verified lymph node metastases. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis.INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive 6 cycles of DTP (standard group) or T-DM1 (investigational group). Crossover was recommended at lack of response or occurrence of intolerable toxic effects. Assessment with fluorine 18-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18-FDG) positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET-CT) was performed at baseline and after 2 and 6 treatment cycles.MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: Pathologic complete response, defined as ypT0 or Tis ypN0. Secondary end points were clinical and radiologic objective response; event-free survival, invasive disease-free survival, distant disease-free survival, and overall survival; safety; health-related quality of life (HRQoL); functional and biological tumor characteristics; and frequency of breast-conserving surgery.RESULTS: Overall, 202 patients were randomized; 197 (99 women in the standard group [median age, 51 years (range, 26-73 years)] and 98 women in the investigational group [median age, 53 years (range, 28-74 years)]) were evaluable for the primary end point. Pathologic complete response was achieved in 45 patients in the standard group (45.5%; 95% CI 35.4%-55.8%) and 43 patients in the investigational group (43.9%; 95% CI 33.9%-54.3%). The difference was not statistically significant (P = .82). In a subgroup analysis, the pCR rate was higher in hormone receptor-negative tumors than in hormone receptor-positive tumors in both treatment groups (45 of 72 [62.5%] vs 45 of 125 [36.0%]). Three patients in the T-DM1 group experienced progression during therapy. In an exploratory analysis, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes at 10% or more (median) estimated pCR significantly (odds ratio, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.42-5.36; P = .003). Response evaluation with F-18-FDG PET-CT revealed a relative decrease of maximum standardized uptake value by more than 31.3% (median) was associated with pCR (odds ratio, 6.67, 95% CI, 2.38-20.00; P < .001).CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study, treatment with standard neoadjuvant combination DTP was equal to T-DM1.
|
|
| 5. |
- Kornalijnslijper-Altena, Renske, et al.
(författare)
-
PREDIX II HER2 : Improving pre-operative systemic therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplified breast cancer (BC)
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Journal of Clinical Oncology. - : American Society of Clinical Oncology. - 0732-183X .- 1527-7755. ; 38:15 Suppl.
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: Neo-adjuvant systemic therapy (NAT) is the standard of care for most patients with early HER2-amplified and triple negative breast cancer (BC). Increasing the rate of pathological complete response (pCR) is highly meaningful for those patients, as pCR is strongly predictive for improved long-term disease-related outcomes. Clinical and preclinical evidence support the hypothesis that pCR-rates may be augmented by the addition of checkpoint inhibitors, such as monoclonal antibodies targeting the Programmed Death Ligand receptor 1 (PD-L1), to standard systemic NAT. Studies in different BC patient cohorts (e.g., IMPassion130, PANACEA, KATE2) have indicated that PD-L1 protein expression on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL’s) is a predictive marker for checkpoint inhibitor efficacy.Methods: We have initiated a phase II open-label, 2:1 randomized clinical trial where women with early HER2-amplified, PD-L1+ BC (cT2-3 and/or cN+) are treated with standard NAT (composed of anti-HER2 antibodies with a chemotherapy backbone of sequentially taxanes + carboplatin and epirubicin + cyclophosphamide [EC]) +/- atezolizumab during EC. N = 190 patients will be accrued in nine centers in Sweden to be able to demonstrate a 20% increase in pCR-rate, with a power of 80% and a two-sided alpha of 10%. Firstly, a prescreening is performed to select patients with a PD-L1 expression of > 1% on TIL’s. Important exclusion criteria are significant organ dysfunction and (with some exceptions) active auto-immune diseases. Extensive translational side-studies are performed to explore predictive markers for treatment efficacy, including clinicopathologic studies, molecular imaging and microbiome analyses, as well as monitoring of acute and chronic treatment-related toxicity, objective cognitive function and quality of life. As of February 11th, 4 patients have been prescreened and 1 enrolled in the trial. The clinical trial registry number is NCT03894007.
|
|
| 6. |
- Majumder, Khairul, et al.
(författare)
-
Effect on prostate volume following neoadjuvant treatment with an androgen receptor inhibitor monotherapy versus castration plus an androgen receptor inhibitor in prostate cancer patients intended for curative radiation therapy : A randomised study
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Molecular and clinical oncology. - : Spandidos Publications. - 2049-9450 .- 2049-9469. ; 8:1, s. 141-146
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- To avoid pubic arch interference, prostate cancer patients are treated with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to achieve prostate volume (PV) reduction prior to radiation treatment. The aim of the present randomised study was to compare the effects on PV of two regimens of ADT, an androgen receptor inhibitor monotherapy vs. castration plus an androgen receptor inhibitor. Consecutive patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer were included in a randomised neoadjuvant study, comparing an androgen receptor inhibitor monotherapy vs. castration plus an androgen receptor inhibitor. PV was assessed prior to the start of endocrine neoadjuvant treatment and prior to the start of radiation therapy (RT). PV assessment was performed by transrectal ultrasound. A total of 110 patients were included. Final sample constituted 88 (80%) patients due to lack of PV information. Castration plus an androgen receptor inhibitor was more effective in PV reduction compared with an androgen receptor inhibitor alone (P<0.001). Planning target volume decreased in the combination arm. There was no significant difference in clinical or demographic or length of neoadjuvant hormonal treatment between the groups. Overall, a significantly larger PV reduction was achieved by castration plus androgen receptor inhibitor, as compared with androgen receptor inhibitor monotherapy. The PV reduction, however, appeared not to translate into better health associated quality of life during the subsequently given curative intended combined EBRT and HDR-brachytherapy. Potential differences between these two treatments regarding anti-tumor effects on micro metastatic disease and radiation potentiating effect remains to be addressed in future prospective trials.
|
|
| 7. |
- Mulligan, Stephen P, et al.
(författare)
-
Cladribine prolongs progression-free survival and time to second treatment compared to fludarabine and high-dose chlorambucil in chronic lymphocytic leukemia
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Leukemia and Lymphoma. - : Informa Healthcare. - 1042-8194 .- 1029-2403. ; 55:12, s. 2769-2777
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- We conducted a randomized phase III trial to compare the efficacy and safety of two purine analogs, cladribine and fludarabine, with high-dose chlorambucil, in patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Between 1997 and 2004, 223 patients with CLL were randomly assigned to cladribine, fludarabine or chlorambucil, for six cycles of therapy with frequent health-related quality of life assessments. There was no statistical difference for the primary endpoint of overall response with cladribine (70%), fludarabine (67%) and chlorambucil (59%), or complete remission (12%, 7% and 8%), respectively. However, the median progression-free survival (25, 10, 9 months) and median time to second treatment (40, 22, 21 months) were superior with cladribine. There was no significant difference in overall survival (96, 82 and 91 months), nor in toxicity or HRQoL assessments. Monotherapy with cladribine gives superior PFS and longer response duration than fludarabine and chlorambucil as first-line treatment of CLL.
|
|
| 8. |
- Naeser, Ylva, et al.
(författare)
-
Quality of Life in the First Year of Follow-Up in a Randomized Multicenter Trial Assessing the Role of Imaging after Radical Surgery of Stage IIB-C and III Cutaneous Melanoma (TRIM Study)
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Cancers. - : MDPI. - 2072-6694. ; 14:4
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Simple Summary After surgery of high-risk melanoma, patients are usually followed up by physical examinations. Recommendations regarding imaging vary due to insufficient evidence of the benefit of regular scans. It might also be stressful for patients to undergo imaging. In an ongoing Swedish study, half of the patients are randomized to whole-body imaging in addition to physical examinations. Three imaging procedures are performed during the first year. The main aim of our study was to investigate if imaging during the first year of follow-up affected the patients' well-being. Validated self-reporting questionnaires regarding symptoms of anxiety and depression and quality of life were answered at study start and at 1 year. Questionnaires from 204 recurrence-free patients were analyzed. No differences in either level of anxiety/depression or quality of life were found at 1 year follow-up between the imaging and non-imaging group. These findings can be considered in the formulation of future follow-up programs. The benefit of imaging in the follow-up setting for high-risk melanoma patients is uncertain, and even less is known about the impact of intensive follow-up on the patient ' s quality of life. In 2017, a Swedish prospective randomized multicenter study started, in which high-risk melanoma patients are randomly assigned 1:1 to follow-up by physical examinations +/- whole-body imaging. The first-year examinations are scheduled at 0, 6 and 12 months. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the patients ' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and levels of anxiety and depression were affected at 1 year by imaging. Anxiety/depression and HRQoL were assessed at 0 and 12 months by the questionnaires Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale and EORTC QLQ-C30 version 3. Expected baseline QLQ-C30 values for the patients were calculated using data from the general population. In total, 204 patients were analyzed. Mean differences in subscale scores at 1 year were not statistically significant either for HRQoL or for anxiety/depression. Baseline HRQoL did not differ from expected values in the general Swedish population. In conclusion, the patients in general coped well with the situation, and adding whole-body imaging to physical examinations did not affect the melanoma patients' HRQoL or levels of anxiety or depression.
|
|
