| 1. |
- Brante, Göran, 1951
(författare)
-
Allmän didaktik och ämnesdidaktik - en inledande diskussion kring gränser och anspråk
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Nordisk tidskrift för Allmän Didaktik. - 2002-1534. ; 2:1, s. 52-68
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Swedish teacher education policies, in line with the evidence discourse, emphasize subject knowledge, and subject didactics have a vast influence in school and teacher education. But what is the difference between general and subject didactics? In subject didactic text books it is suggested that didactic subject knowledge is more or less sufficient for thinking and planning teaching, and/or that everything concerning school is subject didactics. The aim of the article is to problematize the concept of subject didactics and its claims in relation to planning and teaching. Instead it is suggested that subject matter planning and teaching within school education can be understood as general didactics. This will be presented in two ways. First, one theory strongly involving thinking about subject matter for the planning of teaching, is used to illustrate that this actually is general didactic theories of how content can be thought about, treated and handled in the planning of teaching. It is Klafkis theory of didactic analysis. Secondly, scientific articles in mathematics, history and biology, claimed to be representative for subject didactics will be used to demonstrate that what is stressed in them as subject didactics, in fact seem to be traditional general didactic positions. If this reasoning has credibility it should be reason to investigate more profoundly the intersection between general and subject didactics.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Brante, Göran, 1951, et al.
(författare)
-
Theorising teaching and learning: pre-service teachers' theoretical awareness of learning.
- 2015
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Teacher Education. - : Informa UK Limited. - 0261-9768 .- 1469-5928. ; 38:1, s. 102-118
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- We examine pre-service teachers’ theoretical learning during one five-week training module, and their educators’ learning about better lecture design to foster student learning. The study is iterative: interventions (one per group) were implemented sequentially in student groups A–C, the results of the previous intervention serving as the baseline for the design developed for the next. These learning study participants, 79 students from year three of a teacher training programme, studied the variation theory (VT) of learning. Three lesson cycles were completed, each comprising four steps: (1) a pre-test, (2) a 15-min intervention discussing VT, (3) a post-test and (4) a delayed post-test conducted eight weeks later. The results indicated learning differences between groups; qualitative analysis identified three categories of student answers, i.e. emergent, premature and unaware, regarding their theoretical understanding. Group C had more students with emergent knowledge (36%) than did groups A (20%) or B (17%) at post-testing.
|
|
| 4. |
- Brante, Göran, 1951
(författare)
-
Utbildning är 'ofta' det bästa
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Dagens Nyheter. - 1101-2447.
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 5. |
- Granberg, Albina, 1986-, et al.
(författare)
-
Knowing how to use and understand recipes: What arithmetical understanding is needed when students with mild intellectual disabilities use recipes in practical cooking lessons in Home Economics?
- 2017
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Consumer Studies. - : Wiley. - 1470-6423 .- 1470-6431. ; 41:5, s. 494-500
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The aim of this study was to explore what arithmetical understanding is needed when students with mild intellectual disabilities use recipes during practical cooking lessons in Home Economics. The settings were compulsory schools in Sweden attended by students with intellectual disabilities. Sixteen lessons in Home Economics during which cooking took place were observed. In total, 37 students and three teachers participated. All students had a mild intellectual disability. Their ages varied, but most were between 13 and 14 years old. The sociocultural perspective on learning, combined with a literacy framework, was used as a theoretical foundation for the study. Main findings are that students need an arithmetical understanding of (i) how to interpret numbers, (ii) how to interpret and use units, and (iii) how to compute when using recipes. The knowledge and skills needed to be able to use a recipe are featured in the concept recipe literacy, capturing both theoretical, declarative knowledge and the more practical, procedural knowledge. Recipe literacy can be used to theorize the use of recipes when learning to cook, as in Home Economics.
|
|
