| 1. |
- Djureinovic, Dijana, et al.
(författare)
-
Profiling cancer testis antigens in non-small-cell lung cancer
- 2016
-
Ingår i: JCI INSIGHT. - : American Society for Clinical Investigation. - 2379-3708. ; 1:10
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Cancer testis antigens (CTAs) are of clinical interest as biomarkers and present valuable targets for immunotherapy. To comprehensively characterize the CTA landscape of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we compared RNAseq data from 199 NSCLC tissues to the normal transcriptome of 142 samples from 32 different normal organs. Of 232 CTAs currently annotated in the Caner Testis Database (CTdatabase), 96 were confirmed in NSCLC. To obtain an unbiased CTA profile of NSCLC, we applied stringent criteria on our RNAseq data set and defined 90 genes as CTAs, of which 55 genes were not annotated in the CTdatabase, thus representing potential new CTAs. Cluster analysis revealed that CTA expression is histology dependent and concurrent expression is common. IHC confirmed tissue-specific protein expression of selected new CTAs (TKTL1, TGIF2LX, VCX, and CXORF67). Furthermore, methylation was identified as a regulatory mechanism of CTA expression based on independent data from The Cancer Genome Atlas. The proposed prognostic impact of CTAs in lung cancer was not confirmed, neither in our RNAseq cohort nor in an independent meta-analysis of 1,117 NSCLC cases. In summary, we defined a set of 90 reliable CTAs, including information on protein expression, methylation, and survival association. The detailed RNAseq catalog can guide biomarker studies and efforts to identify targets for immunotherapeutic strategies.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Grinberg, Marianna, et al.
(författare)
-
Reaching the limits of prognostication in non-small cell lung cancer : an optimized biomarker panel fails to outperform clinical parameters.
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Modern Pathology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0893-3952 .- 1530-0285. ; 30:7, s. 964-977
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Numerous protein biomarkers have been analyzed to improve prognostication in non-small cell lung cancer, but have not yet demonstrated sufficient value to be introduced into clinical practice. Here, we aimed to develop and validate a prognostic model for surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer. A biomarker panel was selected based on (1) prognostic association in published literature, (2) prognostic association in gene expression data sets, (3) availability of reliable antibodies, and (4) representation of diverse biological processes. The five selected proteins (MKI67, EZH2, SLC2A1, CADM1, and NKX2-1 alias TTF1) were analyzed by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays including tissue from 326 non-small cell lung cancer patients. One score was obtained for each tumor and each protein. The scores were combined, with or without the inclusion of clinical parameters, and the best prognostic model was defined according to the corresponding concordance index (C-index). The best-performing model was subsequently validated in an independent cohort consisting of tissue from 345 non-small cell lung cancer patients. The model based only on protein expression did not perform better compared to clinicopathological parameters, whereas combining protein expression with clinicopathological data resulted in a slightly better prognostic performance (C-index: all non-small cell lung cancer 0.63 vs 0.64; adenocarcinoma: 0.66 vs 0.70, squamous cell carcinoma: 0.57 vs 0.56). However, this modest effect did not translate into a significantly improved accuracy of survival prediction. The combination of a prognostic biomarker panel with clinicopathological parameters did not improve survival prediction in non-small cell lung cancer, questioning the potential of immunohistochemistry-based assessment of protein biomarkers for prognostication in clinical practice.Modern Pathology advance online publication, 10 March 2017; doi:10.1038/modpathol.2017.14.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Skribek, Marcus, et al.
(författare)
-
Real-world analysis of MET exon 14 mutations in non-small cell lung cancer : a retrospective study from two Swedish hospitals
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Acta Oncologica. - 0284-186X. ; 62:12, s. 1808-1814
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Real-World evidence on mesenchymal-epithelial transition exon 14 skipping mutations (METex14) in lung cancer remains limited. With an incidence of 3–4% across histological subtypes, METex14 is now an actionable target for MET inhibitors (METi) in advanced lung cancer, demonstrating response rates between 30–70%. Yet, its role in early stages and sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is still under exploration. Material and methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the clinical data of lung cancer patients presenting with METex14 across all stages. These patients were treated at two Swedish University Hospitals: Karolinska and Skåne, between the years 2014 and 2022. Results: We identified a total of 63 patients, of which 50 met the inclusion criteria. The median overall survival (OS) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) according to the stage was not reached (NR) for stage I, NR for stage II, 15 months (95% CI, 5.4–24.6) for stage III, and 17 months (95% CI, 9.2–NR) for stage IV. The median OS for stage IV patients who received a METi was 17 months (95% CI, 9.5–NR) vs. 10 months (95% CI, 6.2–NR) in patients without METi (p = 0.92; Hazard Ratio [HR] = 1.07). The median OS for stage IV patients who received ICIs was 18 months (95% CI, 16.5–NR) vs. 6 months (95% CI, 2.5–NR) in patients without ICIs (p = 0.15; HR = 0.47). The median OS for stage IV patients who received chemotherapy was 17 months (95% CI, 9.7–NR) vs. 10 months (95% CI, 4.5–NR) in patients without (p = 0.97; HR = 0.98). Conclusions: Our data suggest limited survival benefits from METi, ICIs, and chemotherapy for METex14 lung cancer patients. While not statistically significant, these findings underscore the need for larger trials for validation. Identifying effective treatments for this challenging lung cancer subtype remains a priority.
|
|
