| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Carlbring, P., et al.
(författare)
-
Behandling av paniksyndrom via Internet
- 2000
-
Ingår i: Paper presented at the Läkaresällskapets Riksstämma, Göteborg.
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 4. |
- Carlbring, P, et al.
(författare)
-
Paniksyndromsbehandling via Internet
- 2000
-
Ingår i: Paper presented at Beteendeterapeutiska Föreningens årsmöte, Uppsala..
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Andersson, Gerhard, et al.
(författare)
-
Internet-Based Vs. Face-To-Face Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Psychiatric and Somatic Disorders : a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Abstracts from the 44th Congress of the European Association for Behavioural & Cognitive Therapies. - Utrecht : EABCT.
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- Internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy (ICBT) has been tested in many research trials but to a lesser extent been directly compared against face-to-face delivered cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on trials in which guided ICBT was directly compared against face-to-face CBT within the same trial. Studies on psychiatric and somatic conditions were included. Systematic searches resulted in 13 studies (total N=1053) that met all review criteria and were included in the review. There were 3 studies on social anxiety disorder, 3 on panic disorder, 2 on depressive symptoms, 2 on body dissatisfaction, 1 on tinnitus, 1 on male sexual dysfunction, and 1 on spider phobia. Face-to-face CBT was either in the individual format (n=6 ) or in the group format (n=7). We also assessed quality and risk of bias. Results showed a pooled effect size at post-treatment across of Hedges g = -0.01 (95% CI, -0.13 to 0.12), indicating that ICBT and face-to-face treatment produce equivalent overall effects. Study quality did not affect outcomes. While the overall results indicate equivalence, there are still few studies for each psychiatric and somatic condition and many for which guided ICBT has not been compared against face-to-face treatment. Thus, more research is needed to establish equivalence of the two treatment formats.
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
- Carlbring, Per, et al.
(författare)
-
In session virtual reality use for public speaking anxiety : A randomized controlled trial
- 2017
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- Fear of public speaking is common and for some individuals this interferes significantly with the person's life and causes marked distress. We wanted to test a newly developed virtual reality assisted 1-session in-person treatment (3 hours). The therapist guided session consisted of a series of behavioral experiments based on the expectancy violation principle. This was followed by a 4-week booster intervention delivered via the internet. Following a diagnostic interview a total of 50 individuals with a score of ≥ 60 on the Personal Report of Public Speaking Anxiety questionnaire were randomized to a treatment or a control condition. A total of 78% also met criteria for social anxiety disorder. Considering only having had one treatment session in-person the preliminary results were promising with a between group effect size on the primary outcome (Public Speaking Anxiety Scale) of Cohen’s d=1.32 before commencing the internet-based booster program. Four weeks later the between-group effect size was d=1.90. However, on the secondary outcome measures the effect sizes were more often moderate than large. At the time of the conference 6-month follow-up data will be available in addition to the already collected post-assessment data (analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle).
|
|
