| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Carlsson, Sven A., et al.
(författare)
-
Towards a Design Science Research Approach for IS Use and Management: : Applications from the Areas of Knowledge Management, E-learning and IS Integration
- 2008
-
Ingår i: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST 2008). ; , s. 111-131
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- Design science research is an essential part of IS research since the field should not only try to understand how the world is but also how to change it. We argue that the aim of IS design science research should be to develop practical knowledge not only for the design and improvement of IS but also for IS use and management. Whereas substantial methodological support exists for researchers engaged in behavioral IS research, only limited methodological support exists for researchers with the ambition to develop new IS design theories and new IT artifacts. For the development of design theories for IS use and management the methodological support is even weaker. To overcome this shortcoming we suggest an approach for design research on IS use and management. We give three examples of the proposed approach in use by applying it to the areas of knowledge management systems, e-learning and IS integration.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Hrastinski, Stefan, et al.
(författare)
-
On how to develop design theories for IS use and management
- 2008
-
Ingår i: Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Information Systems.
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- Design science research is an essential part of IS research since the field should not only try to understand how the world is but also how to change it. We argue that the aim of IS design science research should be to develop practical knowledge not only for the design and improvement of IS but also for IS use and management. Whereas substantial methodological support exists for researchers engaged in behavioural IS research, only limited methodological support exists for researchers with the ambition to develop new IS design theories and new IT artefacts. For the development of design theories for IS use and management the methodological support is even weaker. To overcome this shortcoming we suggest an approach for design research on IS use and management. We give two examples of the proposed approach in use by applying it to the areas of knowledge management systems and e-learning.
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
- Johansson, Ulf, et al.
(författare)
-
Preface
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Proceedings of Machine Learning Research. - : ML Research Press. ; , s. 1-3
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 10. |
- Maaninen Olsson, Eva, et al.
(författare)
-
Knowledge Integration and the Meaning of Boundary Activities
- 2006
-
Ingår i: International Conference on Organizational Learning, Knowledge and Capabilities, OLKC 2006, University of Warwick.
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- Knowledge integration is a critical topic in current knowledge management research and practice. Research on this topic focuses primarily on how knowledge is integrated within a work setting. A less researched area is knowledge integration between different work groups, which is the focus of this paper. The paper presents two intensive case studies—one permanent work setting and one temporary (project) work setting—which were studied using a practice-based perspective. The purpose is to describe and explain how knowledge is integrated between different work groups and we address why is it that boundary activities work or break in knowledge integration. A main result of the study is that knowledge integration in the two cases was more complicated than the literature suggests. Differences in knowledge and organizational landscapes made knowledge integration a challenging task. Both differences and similarities were found between the two cases. Differences were seen in the use of boundary spanning activities and boundary objects. Similarities that were found were, for example, organizational structures and mechanisms, i.e. purposes, rules, and infrastructures, which facilitated the integration of knowledge or could function as obstacles and impediments.
|
|
