Sök i SwePub databas

  Utökad sökning

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Carter H Ballentine) "

Sökning: WFRF:(Carter H Ballentine)

  • Resultat 1-5 av 5
Sortera/gruppera träfflistan
  • Simpkin, Andrew J., et al. (författare)
  • Prostate-specific antigen patterns in US and European populations : comparison of six diverse cohorts
  • 2016
  • Ingår i: BJU International. - 1464-4096 .- 1464-410X. ; 118:6, s. 911-918
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • <p><strong>OBJECTIVE:</strong> To determine whether there are differences in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels at diagnosis or changes in PSA levels between US and European populations of men with and without prostate cancer (PCa).</p><p><strong>SUBJECTS AND METHODS:</strong> We analysed repeated measures of PSA from six clinically and geographically diverse cohorts of men: two cohorts with PSA-detected PCa, two cohorts with clinically detected PCa and two cohorts without PCa. Using multilevel models, average PSA at diagnosis and PSA change over time were compared among study populations.</p><p><strong>RESULTS:</strong> The annual percentage PSA change of 4-5% was similar between men without cancer and men with PSA-detected cancer. PSA at diagnosis was 1.7 ng/mL lower in a US cohort of men with PSA-detected PCa (95% confidence interval 1.3-2.0 ng/mL), compared with a UK cohort of men with PSA-detected PCa, but there was no evidence of a different rate of PSA change between these populations.</p><p><strong>CONCLUSION:</strong> We found that PSA changes over time are similar in UK and US men diagnosed through PSA testing and even in men without PCa. Further development of PSA models to monitor men on active surveillance should be undertaken in order to take advantage of these similarities. We found no evidence that guidelines for using PSA to monitor men cannot be passed between US and European studies.</p>
  • Bastian, Patrick J., et al. (författare)
  • Insignificant Prostate Cancer and Active Surveillance: From Definition to Clinical Implications
  • 2009
  • Ingår i: European Urology. - Elsevier. - 1873-7560. ; 55:6, s. 1321-1332
  • Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Context: Due to early detection strategies, prostate cancer is diagnosed early in its natural history. It remains unclear whether all patients diagnosed with prostate cancer warrant radical treatment or may benefit from delayed intervention following active surveillance. Objective: A systematic review of active surveillance protocols to investigate the inclusion criteria for active surveillance and the outcome of treatment. Evidence acquisition: Medline was searched using the following terms: prostate cancer, active surveillance and expectant management for dates up to October 2008. Further studies were chosen on the basis of manual searches of reference lists and review papers. Evidence synthesis: Numerous studies on active surveillance were identified. The recent inclusion criteria of the studies are rather similar. Keeping the short follow-up of all studies in mind, the majority of men stay on active surveillance, and the percentage of patients receiving active treatment is as high as 35% of all patients. Once a patients requires active treatment, most patients still present with curable prostate cancer. Furthermore, only few deaths due to prostate cancer have occurred. Conclusions: Active surveillance is an alternative option to immediate treatment of men with presumed insignificant prostate cancer. It seems that criteria used to identify men with low-risk prostate cancer are rather similar, and immediate treatment of men meeting these criteria may result in an unnecessary number of treatments in these highly selected patients. Data from randomised trials comparing active surveillance and active treatment will provide additional insight into outcome and follow-up strategies. (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology.
  • Carter, H Ballentine, et al. (författare)
  • Early detection of prostate cancer : AUA Guideline
  • 2013
  • Ingår i: Journal of Urology. - 0022-5347 .- 1527-3792. ; 190:2, s. 419-426
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • <p><strong>PURPOSE:</strong></p><p>The guideline purpose is to provide the urologist with a framework for the early detection of prostate cancer in asymptomatic average risk men.</p><p><strong>MATERIALS AND METHODS:</strong></p><p>A systematic review was conducted and summarized evidence derived from over 300 studies that addressed the predefined outcomes of interest (prostate cancer incidence/mortality, quality of life, diagnostic accuracy and harms of testing). In addition to the quality of evidence, the panel considered values and preferences expressed in a clinical setting (patient-physician dyad) rather than having a public health perspective. Guideline statements were organized by age group in years (age &lt;40; 40 to 54; 55 to 69; ≥ 70).</p><p><strong>RESULTS:</strong></p><p>Except prostate specific antigen-based prostate cancer screening, there was minimal evidence to assess the outcomes of interest for other tests. The quality of evidence for the benefits of screening was moderate, and evidence for harm was high for men age 55 to 69 years. For men outside this age range, evidence was lacking for benefit, but the harms of screening, including over diagnosis and overtreatment, remained. Modeled data suggested that a screening interval of two years or more may be preferred to reduce the harms of screening.</p><p><strong>CONCLUSIONS:</strong></p><p>The Panel recommended shared decision-making for men age 55 to 69 years considering PSA-based screening, a target age group for whom benefits may outweigh harms. Outside this age range, PSA-based screening as a routine could not be recommended based on the available evidence.</p>
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Resultat 1-5 av 5
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy