| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Zhang, L. Q., et al.
(författare)
-
MMS Observation on the Cross-Tail Current Sheet Roll-up at the Dipolarization Front
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Journal of Geophysical Research - Space Physics. - : American Geophysical Union (AGU). - 2169-9380 .- 2169-9402. ; 126:4
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- We perform a case study on the evolution of the current sheet in different regions around the dipolarization front (DF), including magnetic-dip preceding the DF, front at the DF, and magnetic pileup region (MPR) behind the DF based on magnetospheric multiscale (MMS) observation on July 31, 2017. In this event, MMS1 stays inside the current sheet during the whole bursty bulk flow (BBF) interval. Our analysis reveals that the cross-tail current sheet at the DF is rolled up, signified by the depression (-V-z/-B-z) at the dip and elevation (+V-z/+B-z) at the front. The minimum variance analysis on the magnetic field method is applied to obtain the normal direction of the current sheet. The result confirms the roll-up, that is, downward at the depressed current sheet and upward at the elevated current sheet. The current sheet roll-up at the DF is asymmetric, with steeper elevation than depression. The elevation angle of the elevated current sheet is evaluated to be similar to 30 degrees. Strong duskward and predominantly perpendicular J spike (similar to 90 nA/m(2)) concentrate at the interface between the dip and the front. The strength of the current of the J-spike is about nine/three times the current at the dip/front. The front is characterized by positive E center dot J. In the dip/MPR, no such preference is seen. Ion/Electron pitch angle distributions exhibit significant and different evolutions in the roll-up current sheet from dip to front, including their energy-dependence and distributions. Finally, the roll-up current sheet could decelerate BBF and change the flow structure. The potential significance of the roll-up current sheet on BBF evolution is emphasized.
|
|
| 6. |
- Zhang, L. Q., et al.
(författare)
-
BBF Deceleration Down-Tail of X <-15 RE From MMS Observation
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Journal of Geophysical Research - Space Physics. - 2169-9380 .- 2169-9402. ; 125:2
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- We report the direct observation on bursty bulk flow (BBF) deceleration down-tail of X < -15 R-E by MMS satellite. Two typical events are presented in the paper. In the first event on 05 June 2018, MMS1 is located at X similar to -16.1 R-E and records four individual bursty flows (BFs). Each burst flow has distinctly lower velocity than the preceding one. Accompanying with the decelerated BFs, the Bz/Bx continuously increases/decreases. Simultaneous Vx-decrease and Bz-increase are in coincidence with the scenario of the local BBF deceleration and formation of the magnetic pileup region. In the second event on 03 July 2017, MMS stays in the neutral sheet of X similar to -24.5 R-E, and encounters similar BBF deceleration process. For both events, the decelerated BF series exhibit prominent medium-energy ion component (2-10 KeV). Analyses show enhanced parallel current (J(//)) and Kinetic Alfvenic wave (KAW) emitting during the BF intervals. The strength of the emitted KAW has a clear tendency to decay with the BBF decreasing. Power spectra density analysis confirms the substantial Joule dissipation during the BBF deceleration, both J(//) and J(perpendicular to). Combined analyses support BBF dissipation via Joule heating as well as KAW emitting. Finally, we propose a possible mechanism on the BBF deceleration, i.e., "collision" with the tailward flow.
|
|
| 7. |
- Zhang, L. Q., et al.
(författare)
-
Vorticity Within Bursty Bulk Flows : Convective Versus Kinetic
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Journal of Geophysical Research - Space Physics. - : American Geophysical Union (AGU). - 2169-9380 .- 2169-9402. ; 127:3
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Based on four-point Magnetospheric Multiscale observation, we carefully analyze the vorticity field in the course of a reconnection jet on 27 June 2017. In this event, the convective electric field (E-c) is overwhelmed by the kinetic electric field (E-k). Accordingly, the omega-field in the course of the BBF is dominated by kinetic vorticity (omega(k)). The omega-field in the E-k-dominated bursty bulk flow (BBF) is characterized by perpendicular anisotropy. Comparison of velocity-curl vorticity (omega= backward difference xV $\mathbf{\omega }=\nabla \times \mathbf{V}$) with E/B induced vorticity confirms a greater contribution to the BBF vorticity by E (omega E=(B. backward difference )E/B2 ${\mathbf{\omega }}_{\mathbf{E}}=(\mathbf{B}\cdot \nabla )\boldsymbol{E}/{\boldsymbol{B}}<^>{2}$) than by B (omega B=(E. backward difference )B/B2 ${\mathbf{\omega }}_{\mathbf{B}}=(\mathbf{E}\cdot \nabla )\mathbf{B}/{\boldsymbol{B}}<^>{2}$). Power spectrum density reveals that in the E-k-dominated BBF, the E-c and E-k spectra have different power laws. E-c dominates the B-spectrum while E-k dominates the E-spectrum. The E-c(B) spectrum has a -5/3-like slope below 0.25 Hz but a -3-like above 0.25 Hz. The E-k(E) spectrum is -5/3-like at the low-frequency end (below 0.1 Hz) but -2-like at the high-frequency end (above 2 Hz). Within its medium frequency range, the spectrum is flat. Particularly, the E-k(E) spectrum exhibits the bump at 1-2 Hz in the frequency domain. The solitary/bipolar E-spikes, with typical temporal scale of 0.3-1 s, are likely responsible for the E-bump. Finally, we statistically analyze and compare the vorticity field in E-k-dominated and E-c -dominated BBFs. The result demonstrates that the E-k-dominated BBF tends to have stronger vorticity than the E-c -dominated BBF.
|
|
| 8. |
- Zhang, L. Q., et al.
(författare)
-
Turbulent current sheet frozen in bursty bulk flow : observation and model
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Scientific Reports. - : Nature Publishing Group. - 2045-2322. ; 12:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Utilizing four-point joint observations by Magnetospheric Multiscale Spacecraft (MMS), we investigate the main features of the current sheet frozen in (CSFI) the bursty bulk flow. Typical event on the steady long-lasting BBF on July 23, 2017 shows the enhanced dawn-dusk current (Jy(0)) in the CSFI (beta similar to 10). The magnitude of the Jy(0) in the CSFI is about 5.5 nA/m(2). The CSFI is highly turbulent, with the ratio of Delta J/J(0) of similar to 2 (where Delta J is perturbed J). The turbulent CSFI is characterized by intermittent current coherent structures. The magnitude of the spiky-J at coherent structures is typically above 30 nA/m(2). Spectrum analysis exhibits that BBF turbulence follows distinct dissipation laws inside and outside the CSFI. Based on MMS observations, we propose a new model of the BBF in the framework of magnetohydrodynamics. In this model, the BBF is depicted as a closed plasma system with the localized current sheet frozen at the center of the flow (Taylor's hypothesis). In the light of principle of Helmholtz-decomposition, the BBF motion in the tail plasma sheet is explained. The model also predicts the thermal expansion of the BBF after leaving the reconnection source region.
|
|
