| 1. |
- Levitis, E, et al.
(author)
-
Centering inclusivity in the design of online conferences-An OHBM-Open Science perspective
- 2021
-
In: GigaScience. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 2047-217X. ; 10:8
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- As the global health crisis unfolded, many academic conferences moved online in 2020. This move has been hailed as a positive step towards inclusivity in its attenuation of economic, physical, and legal barriers and effectively enabled many individuals from groups that have traditionally been underrepresented to join and participate. A number of studies have outlined how moving online made it possible to gather a more global community and has increased opportunities for individuals with various constraints, e.g., caregiving responsibilities.Yet, the mere existence of online conferences is no guarantee that everyone can attend and participate meaningfully. In fact, many elements of an online conference are still significant barriers to truly diverse participation: the tools used can be inaccessible for some individuals; the scheduling choices can favour some geographical locations; the set-up of the conference can provide more visibility to well-established researchers and reduce opportunities for early-career researchers. While acknowledging the benefits of an online setting, especially for individuals who have traditionally been underrepresented or excluded, we recognize that fostering social justice requires inclusivity to actively be centered in every aspect of online conference design.Here, we draw from the literature and from our own experiences to identify practices that purposefully encourage a diverse community to attend, participate in, and lead online conferences. Reflecting on how to design more inclusive online events is especially important as multiple scientific organizations have announced that they will continue offering an online version of their event when in-person conferences can resume.
|
|
| 3. |
- Naito, E, et al.
(author)
-
Human superior parietal lobule is involved in somatic perception of bimanual interaction with an external object
- 2008
-
In: Journal of neurophysiology. - : American Physiological Society. - 0022-3077 .- 1522-1598. ; 99:2, s. 695-703
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The question of how the brain represents the spatial relationship between the own body and external objects is fundamental. Here we investigate the neural correlates of the somatic perception of bimanual interaction with an external object. A novel bodily illusion was used in conjunction with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). During fMRI scanning, seven blindfolded right-handed participants held a cylinder between the palms of the two hands while the tendon of the right wrist extensor muscle was vibrated. This elicited a kinesthetic illusion that the right hand was flexing and that the hand-held cylinder was shrinking from the right side. As controls, we vibrated the skin surface over the nearby bone beside the tendon or vibrated the tendon when the hands were not holding the object. Neither control condition elicited this illusion. The significance of the illusion was also confirmed in supplementary experiments outside the scanner on another 16 participants. The “bimanual shrinking-object illusion” activated anterior parts of the superior parietal lobule (SPL) bilaterally. This region has never been activated in previous studies on unimanual hand or hand-object illusion. The illusion also activated left-hemispheric brain structures including area 2 and inferior parietal lobule, an area related to illusory unimanual hand-object interaction between a vibrated hand and a touched object in our previous study. The anterior SPL seems to be involved in the somatic perception of bimanual interaction with an external object probably by computing the spatial relationship between the two hands and a hand-held object.
|
|
