| 1. |
- Nystrom, T., et al.
(författare)
-
Glycemic Control in Type 1 Diabetes and Long-Term Risk of Cardiovascular Events or Death After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Journal of the American College of Cardiology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0735-1097 .- 1558-3597. ; 66:5, s. 535-543
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND Patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) have a high risk of cardiovascular events. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate whether preoperative hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) levels could predict cardiovascular events or death after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS This was a nationwide population-based observational cohort study that included all patients with T1DM who underwent primary isolated nonemergency CABG in Sweden between 1997 and 2012, according to the Swedish National Diabetes Register and the SWEDEHEART (Swedish Web-system for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-based care in Heart disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies) register. We calculated the crude incidence rates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and used Cox regression and multivariable hazard ratios (HRs) to estimate the risk of both all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, or repeat revascularization, in relation to HbA(1c) levels. RESULTS In total, 764 patients with T1DM were included. During a median follow-up of 4.7 years, 334 (44%) patients died or had MACE (incidence rate: 82 events/1,000 person-years). After multivariable adjustment, the HR (95% CI) for death or MACE in patients with HbA(1c) levels of 7.1% to 8.0%, 8.1% to 9.0%, 9.1% to 10.0%, and >10.0% were 1.34 (0.82 to 2.21), 1.59 (1.00 to 2.54), 1.73 (1.03 to 2.90), and 2.25 (1.29 to 3.94), respectively, compared with the reference category. When HbA(1c) was used as a continuous variable, the HR for a 1% increase in HbA(1c) level was 1.18, and the 95% CI was 1.06 to 1.32. CONCLUSIONS In patients with T1DM, poor glycemic control before CABG was associated with increased long-term risk of death or MACE. (HeAlth-data Register sTudies of Risk and Outcomes in Cardiac Surgery [HARTROCS]; NCT02276950). (C) 2015 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
|
|
| 2. |
- Nystrom, T., et al.
(författare)
-
PCI Versus CABG in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes and Multivessel Disease
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Journal of the American College of Cardiology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0735-1097 .- 1558-3597. ; 70:12, s. 1441-1451
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND It is unknown if coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may offer a survival benefit in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in need of multivessel revascularization. OBJECTIVES This study sought to determine if patients with T1D and multivessel disease may benefit from CABG compared with PCI. METHODS In an observational cohort study, the authors included all patients with T1D who underwent a first multivessel revascularization in Sweden from 1995 to 2013. The authors used the SWEDEHEART (Swedish Web-system for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-based care in Heart disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies) register, the Swedish National Diabetes Register, and the Swedish National Patient Register to retrieve information about patient characteristics and outcomes. They estimated hazard ratios (HRs) adjusted for confounders with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all-cause and coronary heart disease mortality, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, stroke, and heart failure using inverse probability of treatment weighting based on propensity scores. RESULTS In total, 683 patients whounderwent CABGand 1,863 patientswho underwent PCI were included. During a mean follow-up of 10.6 years, 53% of patients in the CABG group and 45% in the PCI group died. PCI, compared with CABG, was associated with a similar risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 1.14; 95% CI: 0.99 to 1.32), but higher risks of death from coronary heart disease (HR: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.21 to 1.74), myocardial infarction (HR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.23 to 1.78), and repeat revascularization (HR: 5.64; 95% CI: 4.67 to 6.82). No differences in risks of stroke or heart failure were found. CONCLUSIONS Notwithstanding the inclusion of patients with T1D who might not have been able to undergo CABG in the PCI group we found that PCI, compared with CABG, was associated with higher rates and risks of coronary heart disease mortality, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularizations. Our findings indicate that CABG may be the preferred strategy in patients with T1D in need of multivessel revascularization. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 70: 1441-51) (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American College of Cardiology Foundation. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
|
|
