| 1. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider
- 2008
-
Ingår i: Journal of Instrumentation. - 1748-0221. ; 3:S08003
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- The ATLAS detector as installed in its experimental cavern at point 1 at CERN is described in this paper. A brief overview of the expected performance of the detector when the Large Hadron Collider begins operation is also presented.
|
|
| 2. |
- Demırkan, Binnaz H M, et al.
(författare)
-
Systemic treatment of neuroendocrine tumors with hepatic metastases
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology. - : AVES Publishing Co.. - 1300-4948 .- 2148-5607. ; 23:5, s. 427-437
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Neuroendocrine tumors, 1-2% of all malignancies, are relatively slow-growing neoplasms. The majority of neuroendocrine tumors belong to the World Health Organization Group 2 with well-differentiated endocrine carcinomas, but some tumors can be aggressive. The most common are gastroenteropancreatic-neuroendocrine tumors, followed by bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine tumors; less frequent locations are the ovaries, testis and hepatobiliary locations. They can be either non-functioning tumors with symptoms related to mass effects and malignant tumor disease or functioning tumors with specific hormones/neuropeptides autonomously secreted to induce specific clinical syndromes. Localized neuroendocrine tumors are less frequent than metastatic ones; in fact, up to 75% of patients with small bowel neuroendocrine tumors and 30-85% of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors present with liver metastases either at the time of diagnosis or during the course of the disease. The predominant metastatic site is the liver, which is the best prognostic marker of survival regardless of the primary site. If surgical resection or interventional therapies of the hepatic tumor burden are not feasible, or if the metastases are not confined to the liver, systemic treatment remains the only option. None of the systemic therapies is liver-specific, but rather acts on all metastatic sites. The lack of prospective studies comparing different treatment modalities in homogeneous cohorts of patients makes the best treatment strategy poorly defined. Standard systemic therapy options are somatostatin analogues (octreotide and lanreotide), interferon-α and chemotherapy. Somatostatin analogues not only control symptoms related to functioning tumors but tumor growth as well. Because of the studies challenging its efficacy, as well as the potential for side effects, the more widespread acceptance of interferon-α in the treatment of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors has been limited. Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors do not show high sensitivity to chemotherapy because of their low mitotic rates, high levels of antiapoptotic protein bcl-2 and increased expression of the multi-drug resistant gene. Traditional chemotherapeutic agents are streptozotocin in combination with 5-fluorouracil or doxorubicin, or to some extent dacarbazine. Temozolomide, capecitabine and oxaliplatin, as monoagents or in combination therapy, show efficacy in phase II trials. Patients with poorly differentiated neuroendocrine tumor, regardless of the primary tumor localization, are candidates for cisplatin and etoposide chemotherapy regimen. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy is reported to be an effective treatment option for patients with good performance status and high somatostatin-receptor scintigraphy uptake as well as without major liver involvement. Basic fibroblast growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor, transforming growth factor alpha and beta, insulin-like growth factor type 1, epidermal growth factor, stem cell factor (c-kit), and corresponding receptors have been shown to be expressed in Neuroendocrine tumors. Current phase II-III clinical trials with molecular-targeted therapies revealed promising agents such as everolimus (RAD001), an oral mTOR inhibitor, and sunitinib malate (SU-11248), an oral multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor against vascular endothelial growth factor receptors, platelet-derived growth factor receptors, c-kit receptors, glial cell linederived neurotrophic factor, and FMS-like tyrosine kinase-3 (Flt 3), which were approved for the treatment of advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Ongoing clinical trials with bevacizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor, will further define the role of angiogenesis inhibitors in advanced intestinal neuroendocrine tumors. Various further novel strategies of targeted therapy and microRNA-regulated pathways in neuroendocrine tumors are under development.
|
|
| 3. |
- Eriksson, Barbro
(författare)
-
New drugs in neuroendocrine tumors : rising of new therapeutic philosophies?
- 2010
-
Ingår i: Current Opinion in Oncology. - 1040-8746 .- 1531-703X. ; 22:4, s. 381-386
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There has been a major progress in the understanding of tumor biology during the past decades and, as a consequence, new potential targets for medical treatment of cancer have been identified. Some of the new so-called targeted therapies may prove to be of value also in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). This review focuses on recent progress in the treatment of NETs, discussing new agents and also optimization/improvement of currently available therapies. RECENT FINDINGS: New molecular-targeted therapies, exploiting some of the well known biological properties of NETs, such as presence of somatostatin, peptide and tyrosine kinase receptors and high vascularity, are currently being evaluated in clinical trials. Recent phase II and III data indicate that the multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib has antiproliferative effects in NETs. Similarly, the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus has demonstrated antitumor activity in both carcinoids and pancreatic endocrine tumors. In addition, two oral chemotherapeutic agents, temozolomide and capecitabine, show promising effects and may replace streptozotocin-based regimens. The use of angiogenesis inhibitors has its rationale and bevacizumab has been tested in combination with other drugs. Radiolabeled somatostatin analogues are established as a well tolerated, effective treatment but timing is still unclear and long-term side effects need to be assessed. SUMMARY: Recent phase II studies have provided very promising new treatment options for NET patients. Phase III trials are needed to confirm the results and combinations of different treatment modalities are needed to make optimal use of the new modalities. Ideally, predictors of response should be developed and the new definitions of response necessitates careful monitoring with biomarkers and imaging procedures including functional imaging. Whether the new therapies prolong survival of the patients should also be established.
|
|
| 4. |
- Komitova, Mila, 1974, et al.
(författare)
-
On neural plasticity, new neurons and the postischemic milieu: An integrated view on experimental rehabilitation
- 2006
-
Ingår i: EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY. - : Elsevier BV. - 0014-4886. ; 199:1, s. 42-55
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- This review discusses actual and potential contributors to functional improvement after stroke injuries. Topics that will be covered are neuronal re-organization and sprouting, neural stem/progenitor cell activation and neuronal replacement, as well as the neuronal milieu defined by glia, inflammatory cells and blood vessel supply. It is well established that different types of neuronal plasticity ultimately lead to post-stroke recovery. However, an untapped potential which only recently has started to be extensively explored is neuronal replacement through endogenous or exogenous resources. Major experimental efforts are needed to achieve progress in this burgeoning area. The review stresses the importance of applying neurodevelopmental principles as well as performing a characterization of the role of the postischemic milieu when studying adult brain neural stem/progenitor cells. Integrated and multifaceted experimentation, incorporating actual and possible poststroke function modulators, will be necessary in order to determine future strategies that will ultimately enable considerable progress in the field of neurorehabilitation.
|
|
| 5. |
- Mohebnasab, Maedeh, et al.
(författare)
-
Current and Future Approaches for Monitoring Responses to Anti-complement Therapeutics
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Frontiers in Immunology. - : Frontiers Media S.A.. - 1664-3224. ; 10, s. 1-13
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aberrations in complement system functions have been identified as either direct or indirect pathophysiological mechanisms in many diseases and pathological conditions, such as infections, autoimmune diseases, inflammation, malignancies, and allogeneic transplantation. Currently available techniques to study complement include quantification of (a) individual complement components, (b) complement activation products, and (c) molecular mechanisms/function. An emerging area of major interest in translational studies aims to study and monitor patients on complement regulatory drugs for efficacy as well as adverse events. This area is progressing rapidly with several anti-complement therapeutics under development, in clinical trials, or already in clinical use. In this review, we summarized the appropriate indications, techniques, and interpretations of basic complement analyses, exemplified by a number of clinical disorders.
|
|
| 6. |
- Nilsson, Bo, et al.
(författare)
-
How the Innate Immune System of the Blood Contributes to Systemic Pathology in COVID-19-Induced ARDS and Provides Potential Targets for Treatment
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Frontiers in Immunology. - : Frontiers Media S.A.. - 1664-3224. ; 13
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Most SARS-CoV-2 infected patients experience influenza-like symptoms of low or moderate severity. But, already in 2020 early during the pandemic it became obvious that many patients had a high incidence of thrombotic complications, which prompted treatment with high doses of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH; typically 150-300IU/kg) to prevent thrombosis. In some patients, the disease aggravated after approximately 10 days and turned into a full-blown acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)-like pulmonary inflammation with endothelialitis, thrombosis and vascular angiogenesis, which often lead to intensive care treatment with ventilator support. This stage of the disease is characterized by dysregulation of cytokines and chemokines, in particular with high IL-6 levels, and also by reduced oxygen saturation, high risk of thrombosis, and signs of severe pulmonary damage with ground glass opacities. The direct link between SARS-CoV-2 and the COVID-19-associated lung injury is not clear. Indirect evidence speaks in favor of a thromboinflammatory reaction, which may be initiated by the virus itself and by infected damaged and/or apoptotic cells. We and others have demonstrated that life-threatening COVID-19 ARDS is associated with a strong activation of the intravascular innate immune system (IIIS). In support of this notion is that activation of the complement and kallikrein/kinin (KK) systems predict survival, the necessity for usage of mechanical ventilation, acute kidney injury and, in the case of MBL, also coagulation system activation with thromboembolism. The general properties of the IIIS can easily be translated into mechanisms of COVID-19 pathophysiology. The prognostic value of complement and KKsystem biomarkers demonstrate that pharmaceuticals, which are licensed or have passed the phase I trial stage are promising candidate drugs for treatment of COVID-19. Examples of such compounds include complement inhibitors AMY-101 and eculizumab (targeting C3 and C5, respectively) as well as kallikrein inhibitors ecallantide and lanadelumab and the bradykinin receptor (BKR) 2 antagonist icatibant. In this conceptual review we discuss the activation, crosstalk and the therapeutic options that are available for regulation of the IIIS.
|
|
