| 2. |
- Hatschek, T., et al.
(författare)
-
PREDIX HER2 trial : Event-free survival and pathologic complete response in clinical subgroups and stromal TILs levels
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Annals of Oncology. - : Elsevier. - 0923-7534 .- 1569-8041. ; 31:Suppl. 2, s. S49-S49
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: Neoadjuvant treatment with Trastuzumab-emtansine was associated with similar rates of pathological complete remission (pCR) as standard therapy withd ocetaxel, trastuzumab and pertuzumab in the PREDIX HER2 trial. Here, results of event-free survival (EFS), and pCR rates in key clinical-pathological subgroups and biomarkers including the abundance of stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are presented.Methods: PREDIX HER2 is a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase 2 study involving 9 Swedish sites. Patients with HER2 positive breast cancer, verified by ISH, T>20 mm and/or verified lymph node metastases were randomized to six three-weekly courses of either docetaxel, trastuzumab SC and pertuzumab (group A), or trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1, group B). Switch of treatment to the opposite arm was allowed in case of lack of response or severe toxicity. Radiological evaluation included 18F-FDG PET/CT. Patients in both groups received adjuvant chemotherapy with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide. TILs were evaluated using standard methodology, median 10%.Results: In total 197 pts. were evaluable, 99 in group A, and 98 in group B. pCR (ypT0/is ypN0) was achieved in 90 pts, 45.7%, with no significant difference between the two treatment groups. pCR rates were lower in the group of patients with hormone receptor (HR)epositive compared with HR-negative tumors but similar in both treatment groups. pCR rates did not differ between the two treatments in subgroups defined by age, menopausal status, tumor grade, T size, node status, HR-status, HER2 status and Ki67. Progressive disease was observed in 3 pts. (3%) during treatment with T-DM1, none in group A. After a median follow-up of 2.4 years 13 EFS events occurred, with no significant differences between the treatment groups. The presence of 10% TILs predicted pCR significantly (p¼0.009), similar in both treatment groups. We also found that a decrease of SUVmax by more than 80% was highly predictive of pCR. HRQoL was significantly better in pts. receiving T-DM1.Conclusions: Our data suggest that neoadjuvant T-DM1 may be as effective as standard neoadjuvant treatment in all clinical subgroups evaluated. Both TILs and PET/CT showed potential to predict pCR.Clinical trial identification: NCT02568839.
|
|
| 3. |
- Karakatsanis, Andreas, et al.
(författare)
-
Axillary evaluation in ductal cancer in situ of the breast: challenging the diagnostic accuracy of clinical practice guidelines
- 2021
-
Ingår i: British Journal of Surgery. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 0007-1323 .- 1365-2168. ; 108:9, s. 1120-1125
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Staging of the axilla is not routine in ductal cancer in situ (DCIS) although invasive cancer is observed in 20-25 per cent of patients at final pathology. Upfront sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) is advocated in clinical practice guidelines in certain situations. These include expected challenges in subsequent SLN detection and when the risk for invasion is high. Clinical practice guidelines are, however, inconsistent and lead to considerable practice variability. Methods: Clinical practice guidelines for upfront SLND in DCIS were identified and applied to patients included in the prospective SentiNot study. These patients were evaluated by six independent, blinded raters. Agreement statistics were performed to assess agreement and concordance. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed, to assess guideline accuracy in identifying patients with underlying invasion. Results: Eight guidelines with relevant recommendations were identified. Interobserver agreement varied greatly (kappa: 0.23-0.9) and the interpretation as to whether SLND should be performed ranged from 40-90 per cent and with varying concordance (32-88 per cent). The diagnostic accuracy was low with area under the curve ranging from 0.45 to 0.55. Fifty to 90 per cent of patients with pure DCIS would undergo unnecessary SLNB, whereas 10-50 per cent of patients with invasion were not identified as 'high risk'. Agreement across guidelines was low (kappa=0.24), meaning that different patients had a similar risk of being treated inaccurately. Conclusion: Available guidelines are inaccurate in identifying patients with DCIS who would benefit from upfront SLNB. Guideline refinement with detailed preoperative work-up and novel techniques for SLND identification could address this challenge and avoid overtreatment.
|
|
| 4. |
- Paakkola, N.-M., et al.
(författare)
-
The prognostic and predictive impact of low estrogen receptor expression in early breast cancer : a systematic review and meta-analysis
- 2021
-
Ingår i: ESMO Open. - : Elsevier. - 2059-7029. ; 6:6
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- INTRODUCTION: Traditionally, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer has been defined as tumors with ≥1% positive for ER. The updated American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guidelines recommend that tumors with ER expression of 1%-10% should be classified as ER-low-positive, recognizing the limited clinical evidence on the prognostic and predictive role of low ER expression. We aimed to investigate the predictive role of ER-low expression to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NeoCT) and the prognostic significance of ER-low expressing breast tumors compared with ER-positive or ER-negative breast tumors.METHODS: A meta-analysis was conducted using the Meta-analyses Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines and eligible articles were identified on PubMed and ISI Web of Science databases. The primary outcome was pathologic complete response and secondary outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Twelve retrospective cohort studies were included in the meta-analysis. NeoCT resulted in higher pathologic complete response among patients with ER-low expression compared with ER-positive and comparable to ER-negative. Patients with ER-low breast cancer had a statistically significant worse DFS and OS compared with patients with ER-positive breast cancer, whereas no difference in DFS or OS was observed between ER-low and ER-negative subgroups.DISCUSSION: The current evidence suggests that ER-low breast cancer has a more similar outcome to ER-negative than to ER-positive breast cancer in terms of DFS and OS. ER-low expression seems also to have a predictive role regarding NeoCT. Considering the certainty of current evidence categorized as low to moderate, our results urge the need for well-designed prospective studies investigating the molecular background and the most appropriate treatment strategy for ER-low expressing breast cancer.
|
|
