| 1. |
- Bergh, Anne-Louise, et al.
(författare)
-
Perpetuating ‘New Public Management’ at the expense of nurses’ patient education : a discourse analysis
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Nursing Inquiry. - : Wiley. - 1320-7881 .- 1440-1800. ; 22:3, s. 190-201
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This study aimed to explore the conditions for nurses’ daily patient education work by focusing on managers’ way of speaking about the patient education provided by nurses in hospital care. An explorative, qualitative design with a social constructionist perspective was used. Data were collected from three focus group interviews and analysed by means of critical discourse analysis. Discursive practice can be explained by the ideology of hegemony. Due to a heavy workload and lack of time, managers could ‘see’ neither their role as a supporter of the patient education provided by nurses, nor their role in the development of nurses’ pedagogical competence. They used organisational, financial, medical and legal reasons for explaining their failure to support nurses’ provision of patient education. The organisational discourse was an umbrella term for ‘things’ such as cost-effectiveness, which were prioritised over patient education. There is a need to remove managerial barriers to the professional development of nurses’ patient education. Managers should be responsible for ensuring and overseeing that nurses have the prerequisites necessary for providing patient education as well as for enabling continuous reflective dialogue and opportunities for learning in practice.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Dahlborg Lyckhage, Elisabeth, 1956-, et al.
(författare)
-
Changing essay writing in undergraduate nursing education through action research: a Swedish example
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Nursing Education Perspectives. - : Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health). - 1536-5026 .- 1943-4685. ; 34:4, s. 226-232
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This article describes the development of literature-based models for bachelor degree essays in Swedish undergraduate nursing education. Students' experiences in a course with literature-based models for bachelor degree essays are discussed. The ever-growing body of nursing research and specialized and complex health care practices make great demands on nursing education in terms of preparing students to be both skilled practitioners and users of research. Teaching to help students understand evidence-based practice is a challenge for nursing education. Action research was used to generate knowledge of and practical solutions to problems in everyday locations. Six models were developed: concept analysis, contributing to evidence-based nursing by means of quantitative research, contributing to evidence-based nursing by means of qualitative research, discourse analysis, analysis of narratives, and literature review. Action research was found to be a relevant procedure for changing ways of working with literature-based, bachelor degree essays. The models that were developed increased students' confidence in writing essays and preparedness for the nursing role.
|
|
| 4. |
- Hansson, Anders, 1953-, et al.
(författare)
-
Two sides of the coin - general practitioners' experience of working in multidisciplinary teams.
- 2008
-
Ingår i: Journal of interprofessional care. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1356-1820 .- 1469-9567. ; 22:1, s. 5-16
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Multidisciplinary teamwork, defined as the collaboration between different professional groups to achieve a common purpose, is commonly regarded as a means to meet the complex tasks that medicine has to deal with today. However, many attempts to introduce the method in primary care have failed and this is supposed to be partly due to the fact that general practitioners (GPs) did not participate in the implementation of the method. The aim of this investigation was to get a deeper understanding of their attitude to teamwork by interviewing nine GPs at four Swedish health care centres, where successful teamwork had been ongoing since 1997. Themes and categories in the interviews were identified according to content analysis. Although the attitude in general was in favour of teamwork, four major themes: time-consuming versus time-saving; shared responsibility versus main responsibility; medical expert versus generalist; shared knowledge versus all knowing, could be identified, which all revealed ambivalence towards teamwork among the interviewees. It was concluded that, if teamwork is to be successfully introduced into primary care, the GPs' self-perception has to be taken into consideration as has the prestige and status associated with their traditional role and the benefits of teamwork to the profession of medicine. Apart from time, teamwork requires, professional supervision and doctors need to be trained in this method as early as in medical school.
|
|
