| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Mattsson, Malin, et al.
(author)
-
Personal factors in systemic sclerosis and their coverage by patient-reported outcome measures : A multicentre European qualitative study and literature review
- 2015
-
In: European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. - 1973-9087 .- 1973-9095. ; 51:4, s. 405-421
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an autoimmune disease where thickening of the skin can lead to reduced body function and limitations in activities. Severe forms can also affect and seriously damage inner organs. Patient-centred rehabilitation emphasises considerations of patients’ background, experience and behavior which highlights the need to know if patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) include such personal factors.AIM: To identify and describe personal factors in the experiences of functioning and health of persons with SSc and to examine if and to what extent PROMs in SSc research cover these factors.DESIGN: Data from a qualitative study with focus group interviews were analysed. PROMs in SSc research were identified in a literature review between 2008-2013.SETTING: Participants were recruited from outpatient clinics at rheumatology department.POPULATION: Sixty-three patients with SSc from four European countries participated.METHODS: Data from interviews were analysed using a structure of personal factors developed by Geyh et al. Identified PROMs were analysed and linked to main concepts, related to the personal factors, found in the interview data.RESULTS: Nineteen main concepts were related to the area “patterns of experience and behaviour” in the personal factor structure, 16 to “thoughts and beliefs”, nine to “feelings”, one to “motives” and one to “personal history and biography”, respectively. Among the 35 PROMs identified, 15 did not cover any of the identified concepts. Concepts within the area “feelings” were mostly covered by the PROMs. Five of the PROMs covered “patterns of experience and behaviour”, while “motives” and “personal history and biography” were not covered at all. Four of the identified PROMs covered concepts within the areas “feelings”, “thoughts and beliefs” and “patterns of experience and behaviour” in the same instrument. The Illness Cognition Questionnaire and Illness Behaviour Questionnaire were such PROMs.CONCLUSION: Patterns of experience and behaviour had the highest number of concepts related to personal factors, but few of the PROMs in SSc research covered these factors. Only a few PROMs covered several personal factors areas in the same instrument.CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The results would be of value when developing core sets for outcome measurements in SSc.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Stamm, Tanja A., et al.
(author)
-
Concepts of functioning and health important to people with systemic sclerosis : a qualitative study in four European countries
- 2011
-
In: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. - : BMJ. - 0003-4967 .- 1468-2060. ; 70:6, s. 1074-1079
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Objective To describe the experiences of people with systemic sclerosis (SSc) in different European countries of functioning and health and to link these experiences to the WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to develop a common understanding from a bio-psycho-social perspective. Method A qualitative multicentre study with focus-group interviews was performed in four European countries: Austria, Romania, Sweden and Switzerland. The qualitative data analysis followed a modified form of 'meaning condensation' and the concepts that emerged in the analysis were linked to the ICF. Results 63 people with SSc participated in 13 focus groups. In total, 86 concepts were identified. 32 (37%) of these were linked to the ICF component body functions and structures, 21 (24%) to activities and participation, 26 (30%) to environmental factors, 6 (7%) to personal factors and 1 (1%) to the health condition itself. 19 concepts (22%) were identified in all four countries and included impaired hand function, household activities, paid work, drugs, climate and coldness, support from others and experiences with healthcare institutions, non-pharmacological treatment, social security and benefits. Conclusion Concepts identified in all four countries could be used for guiding clinical assessment, as well as interdisciplinary team care and rheumatological rehabilitation for patients with SSc. For a full understanding of the aspects of the disease that were most relevant to people with SSc, people with SSc from multiple countries needed to be involved.
|
|
