| 1. |
- Johnsen, Hans E., et al.
(författare)
-
Improved Survival for Multiple Myeloma in Denmark Based on Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation and Novel Drug Therapy in Collaborative Trials: Analysis of Accrual, Prognostic Variables, Selection Bias, and Clinical Behavior on Survival in More Than 1200 Patients in Trials of the Nordic Myeloma Study Group
- 2010
-
Ingår i: Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia. - 2152-2650. ; 10:4, s. 290-296
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: An unexplained survival difference was observed in the Nordic Myeloma Study Group (NMSG) high-dose therapy trial 5/94 in Denmark compared with Sweden and Norway; however, this difference was eliminated in the subsequent NMSG trial 7/98. It was hypothesized that a detailed analysis of potential explanations would reveal important information for future designs of clinical trials for multiple myeloma (MM) patients in Denmark. Patients and Methods: The analysis is based on 3 consecutive clinical trials coordinated by NMSG from 1990 to 2000: NMSG 4/90 including 583 patients, NMSG 5/94 including 274 patients and NMSG 7/98 including 414 patients with newly diagnosed MM. Event-free and total survival rates were calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method, and survival comparisons were made by the log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to estimate the prognostic importance of selected variables. Results: The analysis revealed no differences in disease stages, prognostic variables, or inclusion bias at diagnosis between the 3 consecutive NMSG trials. However, the number of initial treatment failures was low, and post-relapse survival was superior in Swedish patients as compared to Danish patients. These differences were explained by a defensive clinical practice in Denmark during 1994-1997 for patients with poor risk refractory or relapsed disease. Conclusion: These initially observed differences were subsequently eliminated most likely as a consequence of international collaboration improving diagnosis, research infrastructure, clinical training, and education as planned within the European Myeloma Network (EMN).
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Lenhoff, Stig, et al.
(författare)
-
Intensive therapy for multiple myeloma in patients younger than 60 years. Long-term results focusing on the effect of the degree of response on survival and relapse pattern after transplantation
- 2006
-
Ingår i: Haematologica. - 0390-6078 .- 1592-8721. ; 91:9, s. 1228-1233
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background and Objectives. From 1994 to 1997 we conducted a population-based, prospective study on intensive therapy in newly diagnosed symptomatic myeloma patients younger than 60 years, comparing their survival to that of a conventionally treated historic population. Long-term results are presented, including the impact of the degree of response on survival and relapse pattern after transplantation. Design and Methods. The prospective population was formed of 397 patients and the historic population of 313 patients. Both populations were calculated to comprise more than 75% of the expected number of new cases. Results. After a median follow-up of 7 years survival was longer in the prospective population than in the historic one (median 60 versus 39 months; p=0.0002). When comparing only patients eligible for intensive therapy the median survival was 63 versus 44 months (p < 0.0001). Attaining a complete response was associated with prolonged event-free survival but not overall survival. The pattern of relapse after transplantation was heterogeneous but could be divided into four major groups; insidious, classical, plasmacytoma form and transformed disease. The median survival after relapse was 29 months. The relapse pattern and time to relapse predicted outcome. Patients relapsing with an insidious or classical form of disease with skeletal events only, or after a long lasting first response were likely to respond well to conventional salvage therapy. In contrast, relapse with multiple symptoms, transformed disease or a short duration of first response implied bad prognosis. Interpretation and conclusions. The relapse pattern after autologous transplantation is heterogeneous and response to salvage therapy is variable. The degree of response and event-free survival after transplantation are not reliable surrogate markers for survival.
|
|
