| 1. |
- Birgisson, Helgi, et al.
(författare)
-
Adverse effects of preoperative radiation therapy for rectal cancer : long-term follow-up of the Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial.
- 2005
-
Ingår i: Journal of Clinical Oncology. - : American Scoiety of Clinical Oncology. - 0732-183X .- 1527-7755. ; 23:34, s. 8697-8705
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- PURPOSE: To analyze the occurrence of subacute and late adverse effects in patients treated with preoperative irradiation for rectal cancer.PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study population included 1,147 patients randomly assigned to preoperative radiation therapy or surgery alone in the Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial conducted 1987 through 1990. Patient data were matched against the Swedish Hospital Discharge Register to identify patients admitted to hospital after the primary treatment of the rectal cancer. Patients with known residual disease were excluded, and patients with a recurrence were censored 3 months before the date of recurrence. Relative risks (RR) with 95% CIs were calculated.RESULTS: Irradiated patients were at increased risk of admissions during the first 6 months from the primary treatment (RR = 1.64; 95% CI, 1.21 to 2.22); these were mainly for gastrointestinal diagnoses. Overall, the two groups showed no difference in the risk of admissions more than 6 months from the primary treatment (RR = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.12). Regarding specific diagnoses, however, RRs were increased for admissions later than 6 months from the primary treatment in irradiated patients for unspecified infections, bowel obstruction, abdominal pain, and nausea.CONCLUSION: Gastrointestinal disorders, resulting in hospital admissions, seem to be the most common adverse effect of short-course preoperative radiation therapy in patients with rectal cancer. Bowel obstruction was the diagnosis of potentially greatest importance, which was more frequent in irradiated than in nonirradiated patients.
|
|
| 2. |
- Birgisson, Helgi, 1967-
(författare)
-
Cancer of the Colon and Rectum : Population Based Survival Analysis and Study on Adverse Effects of Radiation Therapy for Rectal Cancer
- 2006
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- The Swedish Cancer Register was used to determine the relative survival rate in colon and rectal cancer and to estimate the occurrence of second cancers related to radiation therapy for rectal cancer. The Swedish Hospital Discharge Register and hospital records were used to estimate the rate of late adverse effects due to radiation therapy for rectal cancer. The whole Swedish population was the source of the survival studies. Patients participating in the Uppsala Trial and the Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial on radiation therapy for rectal cancer constituted the subjects of the studies on late adverse effects and second cancers.The main results of the survival analysis revealed a significant improvement in the 5-year relative survival rate for both colon and rectal cancer. During the time period 1960-1999, the survival improved from 39.6% to 57.2% in colon cancer and from 36.1% to 57.6% in rectal cancer.Patients irradiated for rectal cancer, in addition to surgery, were at increased risk for a second cancer compared to those treated by surgery alone. This risk increase was mainly found for cancers developing in organs within or adjacent to the irradiated target (relative risk (RR) 2.04; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10–3.79). Furthermore, the most important late adverse effects of radiation therapy seem to be those on the gastrointestinal tract, in the form of small bowel obstruction (RR 1.88; 95%CI 1.10–3.20) and abdominal pain (RR 1.92; 95% CI 1.14–3.23). Overall, the benefit of radiation therapy was greater than its drawbacks, as a large reduction in local recurrences and better survival was noted in patients treated preoperatively with irradiation for rectal cancer.In conclusion, significant improvements in the survival of patients with colon and rectal cancers have occurred in the last decades, especially in patients with rectal cancer. These improvements probably are related to advances in surgical and adjuvant treatment. The radiation therapy has several drawbacks, however, including an increased risk of second cancers and of bowel obstruction. This emphasises the need to further improve the radiation technique and to select only those patients for radiation therapy who are most likely to benefit from it.
|
|
| 3. |
- Birgisson, Helgi, et al.
(författare)
-
Late adverse effects of radiation therapy for rectal cancer : a systematic overview
- 2007
-
Ingår i: Acta Oncologica. - : Informa UK Limited. - 0284-186X .- 1651-226X. ; 46:4, s. 504-516
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- PURPOSE: The use of radiation therapy (RT) together with improvement in the surgical treatment of rectal cancer improves survival and reduces the risk for local recurrences. Despite these benefits, the adverse effects of radiation therapy limit its use. The aim of this review was to present a comprehensive overview of published studies on late adverse effects related to the RT for rectal cancer. METHODS: Meta-analyses, reviews, randomised clinical trials, cohort studies and case-control studies on late adverse effects, due to pre- or postoperative radiation therapy and chemo-radiotherapy for rectal cancer, were systematically searched. Most information was obtained from the randomised trials, especially those comparing preoperative short-course 5 x 5 Gy radiation therapy with surgery alone. RESULTS: The late adverse effects due to RT were bowel obstructions; bowel dysfunction presented as faecal incontinence to gas, loose or solid stools, evacuation problems or urgency; and sexual dysfunction. However, fewer late adverse effects were reported in recent studies, which generally used smaller irradiated volumes and better irradiation techniques; although, one study revealed an increased risk for secondary cancers in irradiated patients. CONCLUSIONS: These results stress the importance of careful patient selection for RT for rectal cancer. Improvements in the radiation technique should further be developed and the long-term follow-up of the randomised trials is the most important source of information on late adverse effects and should therefore be continued.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Folkesson, Joakim, 1969-
(författare)
-
Rectal Cancer : Can the Results be Further Improved?
- 2006
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- The treatment of rectal cancer is complex and comprises: diagnostic measures; different preoperative treatments; a multitude of surgical and technical choices; possibilities of postoperative treatments and postoperative care and follow up. In this thesis, some aspects of this complex paradigm have been further investigated. One of the most feared complications after rectal cancer surgery is anastomotic leakage. The risk of anastomotic leakage is affected by non-influenceable factors related to the tumour and the patient. In the first paper, the risk of anastomotic leakage in relation to a surgical instrument, the circular stapler, was investigated. The risk of leakage was 7% or 11%, depending on the choice of instrument. In the second paper, a long-term evaluation of survival and local recurrence rates in the Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial was made. Randomisation was to either preoperative radiotherapy followed by surgery or surgery alone. After 13 years median follow-up, survival was 38% in the radiotherapy group and 30% in the surgery alone group. Differences in local recurrence rates were seen in all stages. Most rectal cancer operations carry a high risk of morbidity and mortality. For early stage cancers, a local procedure may be sufficient and in the third paper, population-based results of local excision of rectal cancer were explored. In stage I, cancer specific survival was the same after local excision as after major resection, but the relative survival was lower. The risk of local recurrence was higher after local excision than after resections. In the fourth paper, differences in survival rates in the Nordic countries and Scotland were investigated. The relative excess risk of death was highest in Denmark, but only in the first 90 postoperative days. Through applying already existing knowledge and successively introducing new treatments, the results for rectal cancer treatment will be further improved.
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
- Hultman, Bo, 1964-, et al.
(författare)
-
A population-based study of incidence of peritoneal metastases and prognostic factors in patients with loco-regionally advanced gastric cancer
-
Annan publikation (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Purpose The aim was to investigate epidemiological and prognostic factors as a knowledge base for the treatment of patients with loco-regionally advanced gastric cancer (GC). Methods In Uppsala County between 2000 and 2009, two hundred and fifty-five patients with GC were identified. Data from patient records were analyzed for loco-regionally advanced GC, defined as tumor invading the parietal and/or visceral peritoneum, including peritoneal metastasis but excluding serosal invasion from the primary tumor only, at primary diagnosis or during follow-up. Presence or absence of distant metastasis (DM) in these patients was also assessed. Results One hundred and twenty patients (47% of all patients with GC) experienced loco-regionally advanced disease. Forty-one percent also had DM. Median overall survival (mOS) from diagnosis of local-regionally advanced disease was 4.8 months for the whole group of patients, 5.1 months for the subgroup of patients without DM and 4.7 months for the subgroup with DM. Using multivariate Cox analysis, positive prognostic factors for survival identified were good performance status and treatment with palliative chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Synchronous DM was a negative predictive factor. The mOS did not differ between the first and second time period. Discussion Peritoneal metastasis from GC is more common than previously reported. The lack of improvement in OS over the past decade signals a need for new treatment strategies.
|
|
| 9. |
- Hultman, Bo, 1964-, et al.
(författare)
-
Prognostic factors in patients with loco-regionally advanced gastric cancer
- 2017
-
Ingår i: World Journal of Surgical Oncology. - London : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1477-7819. ; 15
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate epidemiologic and prognostic factors relevant to the treatment of loco-regionally advanced gastric cancer (GC).METHODS: Two hundred and fifty-five patients with GC were identified in Uppsala County between 2000 and 2009. Patient records were analyzed for loco-regionally advanced GC defined as tumor with peritoneal involvement, excluding serosal invasion from the primary tumor only, at primary diagnosis or during follow-up. The presence or not of distant metastasis (DM), including hematogenous metastases (e.g., liver, lung, and bone) and/or distant lymph node metastases, was also analyzed. The Cox proportional hazard model was used for multivariate analysis of factors influencing survival.RESULTS: One hundred and twenty patients (47% of all patients with GC; median age 70.5 years) had loco-regionally advanced disease, corresponding to an incidence of 3.8 per 100,000 person-years. Forty-one percent of these also had DM. Median overall survival (mOS) from the time of the diagnosis of loco-regionally advanced disease was 4.8 months for the total patient cohort, 5.1 months for the subgroup of patients without DM, and 4.7 months for the subgroup with DM. There was no significant difference in mOS between the subgroups with synchronous versus metachronous loco-regionally advanced GC: 4.8 months (range 0.0-67.4) versus 4.7 months (range 0.0-28.3). Using multivariate Cox analysis, positive prognostic factors for survival were good performance status at diagnosis and treatment with palliative chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Synchronous DM was a negative prognostic factor. The mOS did not differ when comparing the time period 2000-2004 (5.1 months, range 0-67.4) with the period 2005-2009 (4.0 months, range 0.0-28.3).CONCLUSION: Peritoneal involvement occurred in almost half of the patients with GC in this study and was associated with short life expectancy. New treatment strategies are warranted.
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
