| 1. |
- Demmelmaier, Ingrid, 1960-, et al.
(författare)
-
Does exercise intensity matter for fatigue during (neo-)adjuvant cancer treatment? The Phys-Can randomized clinical trial
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports. - : Wiley. - 0905-7188 .- 1600-0838. ; 31:5, s. 1144-1159
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Exercise during cancer treatment improves cancer-related fatigue (CRF), but the importance of exercise intensity for CRF is unclear. We compared the effects of high- vs low-to-moderate-intensity exercise with or without additional behavior change support (BCS) on CRF in patients undergoing (neo-)adjuvant cancer treatment. This was a multicenter, 2x2 factorial design randomized controlled trial (Clinical Trials NCT02473003) in Sweden. Participants recently diagnosed with breast (n = 457), prostate (n = 97) or colorectal (n = 23) cancer undergoing (neo-)adjuvant treatment were randomized to high intensity (n = 144), low-to-moderate intensity (n = 144), high intensity with BCS (n = 144) or low-to-moderate intensity with BCS (n = 145). The 6-month exercise intervention included supervised resistance training and home-based endurance training. CRF was assessed by Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI, five subscales score range 4-20), and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue scale (FACIT-F, score range 0-52). Multiple linear regression for main factorial effects was performed according to intention-to-treat, with post-intervention CRF as primary endpoint. Overall, 577 participants (mean age 58.7 years) were randomized. Participants randomized to high- vs low-to-moderate-intensity exercise had lower physical fatigue (MFI Physical Fatigue subscale; mean difference −1.05 [95% CI: −1.85, −0.25]), but the difference was not clinically important (ie <2). We found no differences in other CRF dimensions and no effect of additional BCS. There were few minor adverse events. For CRF, patients undergoing (neo-)adjuvant treatment for breast, prostate or colorectal cancer can safely exercise at high- or low-to-moderate intensity, according to their own preferences. Additional BCS does not provide extra benefit for CRF in supervised, well-controlled exercise interventions.
|
|
| 2. |
- Nordin, Karin, et al.
(författare)
-
Anxiety, depression and worry in gastrointestinal cancer patients attending medical follow-up control visits
- 1996
-
Ingår i: Acta Oncologica. - : Informa UK Limited. - 0284-186X .- 1651-226X. ; 35:4, s. 411-416
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Anxiety, depression and worry were assessed in 141 consecutive gastrointestinal cancer patients scheduled for follow-up control visits. Participants completed two questionnaires, one including the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD) in conjunction with the visit and one completed after. The overall levels of anxiety before, during and after the visit were low. There were no differences between those who were considered cured and those who were not. Anxiety levels after the visit were higher for those patients for whom less than one year had passed since diagnosis. Mean HAD scores for anxiety and depression were 4.2 and 4.3 respectively. Women reported a higher degree of anxiety than men. Using a score of 8 or more for 'borderline-possible cases', 15% fell into these categories on the anxiety scale and 12% on the depression scale. About 30% of the patients worried about seeing a new physician and 25% about what the examination or tests would show. It is concluded that regular, scheduled control visits pose a significant threat to the psychological well-being of only a minority of gastrointestinal cancer patients.
|
|
| 3. |
- Nordin, Karin, et al.
(författare)
-
Predicting anxiety and depression among cancer patients : a clinical model.
- 2001
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Cancer. - : Elsevier BV. - 0959-8049 .- 1879-0852. ; 37:3, s. 376-384
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The aim of this study was to investigate the possibility of predicting anxiety and depression 6 months after the cancer diagnosis on the basis of measures of anxiety, depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression, HAD scale), subjective distress (Impact of Event, IES scale) and some aspects of social support in connection with the diagnosis. A further purpose was to attempt identification of individual patients at risk of prolonged psychological distress, and to develop an easily applicable clinical tool for such detection. A consecutive population-based series of 522 newly diagnosed patients with breast, colorectal, gastric and prostate cancer were interviewed in connection with the diagnosis and 6 months later. Anxiety and depression close to the diagnosis explained 39% of the variance in anxiety and depression 6 months later. Patients scoring as doubtful cases/cases for HAD anxiety and/or depression were more than 11 times more likely than non-cases to score as doubtful cases/cases at 6 months. Addition:ll risk factors were having an advanced disease and nobody in addition to the family to rely on in case of difficulties. Levels of anxiety and depression at diagnosis predict a similar status 6 months later. The results also indicate that the HAD scale in combination with a single question about social support may be a suitable screening tool for clinical use.
|
|
| 4. |
- Nordin, Karin, et al.
(författare)
-
Predicting delayed anxiety and depression in patients with gastrointestinal cancer
- 1999
-
Ingår i: British Journal of Cancer. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0007-0920 .- 1532-1827. ; 79:3-4, s. 525-9
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The aim of this study was to examine the possibility of predicting anxiety and depression 6 months after a cancer diagnosis on the basis of measures of anxiety, depression, coping and subjective distress associated with the diagnosis and to explore the possibility of identifying individual patients with high levels of delayed anxiety and depression associated with the diagnosis. A consecutive series of 159 patients with gastrointestinal cancer were interviewed in connection with the diagnosis, 3 months (non-cured patients only) and 6 months later. The interviews utilized structured questionnaires assessing anxiety and depression [Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale], coping [Mental Adjustment to Cancer (MAC) scale] and subjective distress [Impact of Event (IES) scale]. Patient anxiety and depression close to the diagnosis were found to explain approximately 35% of the variance in anxiety and depression that was found 6 months later. The addition of coping and subjective distress measures did little to improve that prediction. A model using (standardized) cut-off scores of moderate to high anxiety, depression (HAD) and intrusive thoughts (IES subscale) close to the diagnosis to identify patients at risk for delayed anxiety and depression achieved a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 98%. Levels of anxiety and depression at diagnosis predicted a similar status 6 months later. The results also indicated that the HAD scale in combination with the IES intrusion subscale may be used as a tool for detecting patients at risk of delayed anxiety and depression.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Nordin, Karin, et al.
(författare)
-
Reactions to gastrointestinal cancer : variation in mental adjustment and emotional well-being over time in patients with different prognoses
- 1998
-
Ingår i: Psycho-Oncology. - 1057-9249 .- 1099-1611. ; 7:5, s. 413-423
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The relation between mental adjustment, often referred to as coping strategies, and emotional well-being and their changes over time were studied in 139 consecutive, newly diagnosed gastrointestinal cancer patients. Sixty-six patients were potentially cured since all known disease could be removed by surgery, whereas in 73 patients, this was not possible. A more confronting reaction to the diagnosis was associated with better emotional well-being whereas avoidance of reminders of, and intrusive thoughts about the disease were associated with more distress. In agreement with other studies, we found that the coping strategy 'Fighting Spirit' was associated with better emotional well-being while the reverse was true for the strategies 'Hopeless/Helplessness' and 'Anxious Preoccupation'. There were only minor changes over time in the average values of emotional well-being and coping strategies, particularly among patients who at diagnosis were considered incurable. In analyses of each individual's changes of predominant coping style and whether they were categorized as cases/doubtful cases on the HAD anxiety and depression scale, marked changes were, however, seen in several patients. The analyses of mean values give an impression of stability, whereas analyses of the number of patients with a specific predominant coping strategy and how they change, give another. The question of whether coping strategies and emotional well-being change through the course of the disease has no simple and obvious answer. Whether some of the investigated coping strategies should be conceptualized in terms of coping, or whether they are an outcome of the coping efforts, are discussed.
|
|
| 7. |
- Nordin, Karin, et al.
(författare)
-
The Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale : a psychometric analysis and the concept of coping
- 1999
-
Ingår i: Psycho-Oncology. - 1057-9249 .- 1099-1611. ; 8:3, s. 250-259
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- A psychometric analysis of the Mental Adjustment to Cancer (MAC) scale was performed in a heterogeneous Swedish sample of cancer patients (n = 868). The homogeneity of the original subscales proved to be satisfactory (alpha coefficients 0.61-0.81). The sample was randomly split into two subgroups, and a factor analysis was carried out in one of them using the LISREL 8.20 procedure. This yielded four factors called 'Hopeless', 'Positive', 'Anxious' and 'Avoidant' including 28 of the 40 original items (alpha coefficients 0.58-0.81). The novel factor structure was cross-validated and confirmed in the second subgroup. In contrast to the original scale (one item), 'Avoidance', was indexed by three items. The distinction between mental adjustment and coping is discussed. It is concluded that both versions of the MAC scale are measures of mental adjustment including emotional reactions as well as coping.
|
|
| 8. |
- Petersson, Lena-marie, et al.
(författare)
-
Differential Effects of Cancer Rehabilitation Depending on Diagnosis and Patients' Cognitive Coping Style
- 2002
-
Ingår i: Psychosomatic Medicine. - 0033-3174 .- 1534-7796. ; 64:6, s. 971-980
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: The major aim was to explore the extent to which the Miller Behavioral Style Scale (MBSS) can be used to differentiate cancer patients who are likely to benefit from rehabilitation efforts with a strong information component from those who are not. METHODS: Newly diagnosed patients with breast, gastrointestinal, or prostate cancer (N = 442) were included in a randomized, prospective study of the effects (on anxiety, depression, intrusion, avoidance) of rehabilitation approximately 4 months after diagnosis as compared with control patients. Patients were classified as "monitors" or "blunters" on the basis of the MBSS (368 patients, 83%, completed the MBSS). RESULTS: The expected interaction at postintervention between coping style and experimental condition (ie, rehabilitation or control) was found only for avoidance among breast and prostate cancer patients. Assignment to the rehabilitation or control condition was of no importance for outcome among blunters. Among monitors, the response pattern differed between breast and prostate cancer patients. Prostate cancer monitors seemed to benefit from rehabilitation on all outcome measures, whereas intrusion and avoidance were reduced among breast cancer patients in the control condition. This interaction of diagnosis with condition (rehabilitation or control) among monitors is suggested to be due to demands for diagnosis-specific information during diagnostic work, in the period just after diagnosis, and before treatment decision. CONCLUSIONS: Only the monitor concept seems useful for predicting response to cancer rehabilitation with a strong information component. However, whether rehabilitation is of benefit depends also on other factors.
|
|
| 9. |
- Wasteson, Elisabet, et al.
(författare)
-
Comparison of a questionnaire commonly used for measuring coping with a daily-basis prospective coping measure
- 2006
-
Ingår i: Journal of Psychosomatic Research. - : Elsevier BV. - 0022-3999 .- 1879-1360. ; 61:6, s. 813-820
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Much research have investigated the relation between stress and health, with focus on the role of coping as a moderator. The use of the concept of coping is in need of more stringency since it is often used in a more or less careless manner. A contributory cause of the confusion within the research field is the often-negligent interpretation of results from the Mental Adjustment to Cancer (MAC) Scale (i.e., results are discussed in terms of coping strategies instead of mental adjustment). Furthermore, checklists are often used in research but seldom specify the stressor that patients are attempting to cope with. METHODS: Consecutive patients newly diagnosed with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer were included in this study. Of 151 eligible patients, 95 (63%) participated. As soon as their physical condition so permitted, patients were asked to assess their coping by way of two methods: an instrument commonly used for measuring coping (MAC Scale) and a daily-basis prospective coping measure [Daily Coping Assessment (DCA)]. The study investigated the relations between these two methods, which are used to evaluate different ways of coping with cancer, and related these to specified stressful events and psychologic distress outcomes [Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)]. RESULTS: Among patients with GI cancers, a comparison of the DCA with the MAC Scale renders important differences regarding the use of coping strategies. Furthermore, coping as measured by the DCA is more clearly separated from both stressors such as psychologic aspects and psychologic distress outcomes as measured by the HADS. DISCUSSION: A comparison between the two measures renders differences regarding the use of coping strategies among patients with GI cancers. The daily-basis prospective coping measure seems to be better separated from both stressful events and psychologic distress outcomes. The DCA offers a promising alternative to the use of coping checklists. The difference between the measures is in accordance with the original intention that the MAC Scale be used to measure mental adjustment rather than coping (i.e., the results do not support the use of the MAC Scale as a coping measure).
|
|
| 10. |
- Wasteson, Elisabet, et al.
(författare)
-
Daily assessment of coping in patients with gastrointestinal cancer
- 2002
-
Ingår i: Psycho-Oncology. - : Wiley. - 1057-9249 .- 1099-1611. ; 11:1, s. 1-11
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Ninety-five patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer participated in a study concerning stressful events, coping and emotional well-being. Participants were either potentially cured (n=62) after radical surgery or non-cured (n=33). For a period of 1 week, close to being informed about their diagnosis, they performed daily recordings of stressful events, the distress occasioned by these events and their perception of control over them, coping, worry and happiness/sadness. Anxiety and depression were assessed by a single retrospective assessment at the end of the week (Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale). The most commonly recorded stressful events were 'Somatic aspects' and 'Everyday concerns'. 'Somatic aspects', 'Social aspects' and 'Other consequences of the disease' were rated as most bothersome. Patients perceived that they had the highest degree of control over 'Returning home after hospital stay', whereas 'Contact with the medical services' was assigned low control. The most commonly used coping strategies were 'Acceptance' and 'Relaxation', and the least used was 'Religion'. Significant positive correlations between the occurrence of stressful events and the use of coping strategies were demonstrated between 'Somatic Aspects' and 'Acceptance'/'Direct Action', and between 'Social Aspects' and 'Seeking Social Support'. Daily assessment of stress-coping relationships represents a promising approach to the understanding of adaptation among cancer patients.
|
|
