| 1. |
- Cashin, Peter H, 1984-, et al.
(författare)
-
Activity ex vivo of cytotoxic drugs in patient samples of peritoneal carcinomatosis with special focus on colorectal cancer
- 2013
-
Ingår i: BMC Cancer. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1471-2407 .- 1471-2407. ; 13, s. 435-
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: The optimal choice of cytotoxic drugs for intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) in conjunction with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis(PC) is poorly defined. We investigated drug sensitivity ex vivo in patient samples of various PC tumor types and correlated clinical outcome to drug sensitivity within the subset of PC fromcolorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: PC tissue samples (n = 174) from mesothelioma, pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP), ovarian cancer, CRC or appendix cancer were analyzed ex vivo for sensitivity to oxaliplatin, cisplatin, mitomycin C, melphalan, irinotecan, docetaxel, doxorubicin and 5-FU. Clinicopathological variables and outcome data were collected for the CRC subset. Results: Mesothelioma and ovarian cancer were generally more drug sensitive than CRC, appendix cancer and PMP. Oxaliplatin showed the most favorable ratio between achievable IPC concentration and ex vivo drug sensitivity. Drug sensitivity in CRC varied considerably between individual samples. Ex vivo drug sensitivity did not obviously correlate to time-to-progression (TTP) in individual patients. Conclusions: Drug-sensitivity varies considerably between PC diagnoses and individual patients arguing for individualized therapy in IPC rather than standard diagnosis-specific therapy. However, in the current paradigm of treatment according to diagnosis, oxaliplatin is seemingly the preferred drug for IPC from a drug sensitivity and concentration perspective. Inthe CRC subset, analysis of correlation between ex vivo drug sensitivity and TTP was inconclusive due to the heterogeneous nature of the data.
|
|
| 2. |
- Cashin, Peter H., et al.
(författare)
-
Comparison of Prognostic Scores for Patients with Colorectal Cancer Peritoneal Metastases Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Annals of Surgical Oncology. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1068-9265 .- 1534-4681. ; 20:13, s. 4183-4189
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background. There are three prognostic scores for the cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) treatment of colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases: the newly introduced COREP (colorectal peritoneal) score, the peritoneal surface disease severity score (PSDS), and the prognostic score (PS). The aim was to determine which prognostic score had the best prognostic value. Methods. Between 2006 and 2010, a total of 77 patients with peritoneal metastases fromcolorectal cancer underwent CRS/HIPEC treatment. The COREP, PSDS, and PS scores were successfully applied to 56 patients (73 %) having sufficient data. The end points were prediction of open-and-close cases (n = 9), R1 resections (n = 41), and survival of <12 months (n = 18). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (accuracy) was compared. Subgroup analysis was performed on patients not previously used for the development of the COREP score (n = 24). Multivariable logistic regressions of the three end points were performed as well as Cox regression for overall survival. Furthermore, COREP and peritoneal cancer index were compared. Results. For open-and-close case prediction, accuracy for the whole group (n = 56) and subgroup (n = 24) was 87 and 88 %, respectively for COREP; 66 and 77 % for PSDS; and 68 and 78 % for PS. For R1 resection prediction, accuracy was 81 and 81 %, 76 and 78 %, and 75 and 77 %, respectively. For prediction of survival of <12 months, accuracy was 83 and 84, 54 and 67 %, and 55 and 56 %, respectively. The COREP score was the only independent prognostic factor in all four multivariable analyses. A COREP score of >= 6 identified patients with poor survival more accurately than a PCI of >20. Conclusions. The COREP score predicted open-and-close cases, R1 resections, and poor survival better than PSDS and PS. COREP better identifies patients with poor survival than intraoperative PCI.
|
|
| 3. |
- Cashin, Peter H, 1984-, et al.
(författare)
-
Cytoreductive Surgery and Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis : Prognosis and Treatment of Recurrences in a Cohort Study
- 2012
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Surgical Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0748-7983 .- 1532-2157. ; 38:6, s. 509-515
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) treatment of colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is gaining acceptance, but controversy remains. The primary aims were to analyze the outcome and prognostic variables of colorectal PC patients treated with CRS and IPC, and to report on the outcome of additional surgical treatments of subsequent recurrences. Methods Patients referred for treatment of colorectal PC between 1996 and 2010 were included in a cohort. The following data was collected: clinicopathological parameters, survival, recurrences, perioperative chemotherapy and type of IPC (hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, HIPEC; or sequential postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy, SPIC). Multivariable analyses were conducted on potential prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). Results In the 151-patient cohort, the median OS was 34months (range: 2-77) for CRS and HIPEC with five-year survival predicted at 40% (five-year disease-free survival 32%). For CRS and SPIC, the OS was 25months (range: 2-188) with five-year survival at 18%. Open-and-close patients survived 6months (range: 0-14) with no five-year survival (HIPEC vs. SPIC p=0.047, SPIC vs. open-and-close p<0.001). Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy was a noteworthy independent prognostic factor in the multivariable analysis. OS for patients undergoing additional surgical treatment of recurrences was 25months vs. 10months with best supportive care or palliative chemotherapy (p=0.01). Conclusion Substantial long-term survival is possible in patients with colorectal PC. HIPEC was associated with better OS than SPIC and adjuvant systemic chemotherapy may improve the outcome in patients. Good OS is achievable in selected patients undergoing additional surgical treatment of isolated liver or peritoneal recurrences after prior complete CRS.
|
|
| 4. |
- Cashin, Peter H, 1984-
(författare)
-
Cytoreductive Surgery and Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Patients with Peritoneal Metastases from Colorectal Cancer : Aspects of loco-regional treatment outcome, patient selection, and chemo-sensitivity
- 2012
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Previously, peritoneal metastases(PM) from colorectal cancer(CRC) have been considered a terminal and generalised form of cancer. A new treatment strategy combining cytoreductive surgery(CRS) and intraperitoneal chemotherapy(IPC) has recently shown promising results. The aim of this thesis was to investigate different aspects of this treatment in order to optimise the treatment and to clarify its potential as a new treatment option. Treatment outcome, patient selection, method of IPC (hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy-HIPEC vs. sequential postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy-SPIC) and choice of drugs for IPC were the aspects covered in this thesis.The treatment outcome of CRS and IPC according to the median overall survival ranged from 24 to 34 months with 5-year overall survival ranging from 20 to 40% depending on the IPC treatment administered. Furthermore, the 5-year disease-free survival was impressive at 32% for patients receiving HIPEC. This establishes the curative potential of this treatment. Due to current inadequacies of radiological imaging, a score (Corep score) was developed for patient selection purposes. This score had a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 100% in identifying patients with short cancer-specific survival after the treatment (<12 months). Further studies are needed to elucidate the clinical usefulness of the Corep score. HIPEC was associated with better survival than the SPIC method at similar morbidity and mortality rates, suggesting that HIPEC be the method of preference. Concerning the choice of drugs, the last study investigated the chemo-sensitivity of different PM tumour-types with a special focus on CRC. While CRC samples were generally more resistant, the ratio of the in vivo concentration compared to the ex vivo concentration giving a 50% tumour cell death showed that oxaliplatin had the best profile across all PM tumour types as well as for CRC. This needs further confirmation in a clinical trial.
|
|
| 5. |
- Cashin, Peter H, et al.
(författare)
-
Intraoperative hyperthermic versus postoperative normothermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colonic peritoneal carcinomatosis : a case-control study
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Annals of Oncology. - : Oxford University Press. - 0923-7534 .- 1569-8041. ; 23:3, s. 647-652
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy has improved prognosis in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. The main modes of intraperitoneal chemotherapy treatment are peroperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and normothermic sequential postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (SPIC). The aim of this study was to compare HIPEC and SPIC with respect to overall survival, disease-free survival, morbidity, and mortality in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from colon cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A matched case-control study was conducted in patients with surgical macroscopic complete removal of carcinomatosis; matching was according to the peritoneal cancer index score. Thirty-two patients were included, 16 in each group (HIPEC and SPIC). Overall survival, disease-free survival, morbidity, mortality, and clinicopathological parameters were compared. RESULTS: Median overall survival was 36.5 months in the HIPEC group and 23.9 months in the SPIC group (P = 0.01). Median disease-free survival for these groups was 22.8 (HIPEC) and 13.0 months (SPIC; P = 0.02). Morbidity was not statistically different, 19% in SPIC and 37% in HIPEC. Postoperative mortality was observed in one patient in each group. CONCLUSION: HIPEC was associated with improved overall survival and disease-free survival compared with SPIC at similar morbidity and mortality, suggesting that HIPEC is the treatment of choice in colonic peritoneal carcinomatosis.
|
|
| 6. |
- Cashin, Peter H, 1984-, et al.
(författare)
-
Patient Selection for Cytoreductive Surgery in Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis using Serum Tumour Markers – an Observational Cohort Study
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Annals of Surgery. - 0003-4932 .- 1528-1140. ; 256:6, s. 1078-1083
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: There were 2 objectives: first, to investigate how many patients were excluded from surgery on the basis of the radiological extent of the peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) or the clinical examination; and second, to develop a score based primarily on serum tumor markers (STMs) that could predict short cancer-specific survival (<12 months). Background: Patient selection and prediction of prognosis is crucial for successful treatment of colorectal PC. Methods: All patients with colorectal PC referred for cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy (2005-2008) at Uppsala University hospital were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups-nonsurgery and surgery. Clinicopathological and laboratory parameters were collected in the surgery group. A Corep (COloREctal-Pc) score was developed using hazard ratios from histology, hematological status, serial serum tumor markers (STMs), and STM changes over time. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predicted value (PPV), and negative predicted value (NPV) were calculated in a second validating dataset (n = 24) with a survival cutoff of less than 12 months. Results: A total of 107 patients were included in the study, 42 in the nonsurgery group and 65 in the surgery group. In the nonsurgery group, 2 patients were excluded solely on the basis of the radiological extent of PC and 7 patients on clinical examination. The Corep score ranged from 0 to 18. A score of 6 or more showed a validated sensitivity of 80%, specificity 100%, PPV 1.0, and NPV 0.93. Conclusions: Radiological extent of PC was not a main deciding factor for treatment decisions and had less impact than the clinical examination. The Corep score identified patients with short cancer-specific survival that may not be suitable for treatment.
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
