| 1. |
- Claassen, Y. H. M., et al.
(författare)
-
International comparison of treatment strategy and survival in metastatic gastric cancer
- 2019
-
Ingår i: BJS Open. - : JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD. - 2474-9842. ; 3:1, s. 56-61
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BackgroundIn the randomized Asian REGATTA trial, no survival benefit was shown for additional gastrectomy over chemotherapy alone in patients with advanced gastric cancer with a single incurable factor, thereby discouraging surgery for these patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate treatment strategies for patients with metastatic gastric cancer in daily practice in five European countries, along with relative survival in each country. MethodsNationwide population-based data from Belgium, Denmark, the Netherlands, Norway and Sweden were combined. Patients with primary metastatic gastric cancer diagnosed between 2006 and 2014 were included. The proportion of gastric resections performed and the administration of chemotherapy (irrespective of surgery) within each country were determined. Relative survival according to country was calculated. ResultsOverall, 15 057 patients with gastric cancer were included. The proportion of gastric resections varied from 81 per cent in the Netherlands and Denmark to 183 per cent in Belgium. Administration of chemotherapy was 392 per cent in the Netherlands, compared with 632 per cent in Belgium. The 6-month relative survival rate was between 390 (95 per cent c.i. 378 to 402) per cent in the Netherlands and 541 (521 to 569) per cent in Belgium. ConclusionThere is variation in the use of gastrectomy and chemotherapy in patients with metastatic gastric cancer, and subsequent differences in survival.
|
|
| 2. |
- Jeremiasen, Martin, et al.
(författare)
-
Improvements in esophageal and gastric cancer care in Sweden-population-based results 2007-2016 from a national quality register
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Diseases of the esophagus. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1120-8694 .- 1442-2050. ; 33:3
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The Swedish National Register for Esophageal and Gastric cancer was launched in 2006 and contains data with adequate national coverage and of high internal validity on patients diagnosed with these tumors. The aim of this study was to describe the evolution of esophageal and gastric cancer care as reflected in a population-based clinical registry. The study population was 12,242 patients (6,926 with esophageal and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancers and 5,316 with gastric cancers) diagnosed between 2007 and 2016. Treatment strategies, short- and long-term mortality, gender aspects, and centralization were investigated. Neoadjuvant oncological treatment became increasingly prevalent during the study period. Resection rates for both esophageal/GEJ and gastric cancers decreased from 29.4% to 26.0% (P=0.022) and from 38.8% to 33.3% (P=0.002), respectively. A marked reduction in the number of hospitals performing esophageal and gastric cancer surgery was noted. In gastric cancer patients, an improvement in 30-day mortality from 4.2% to 1.6% (P=0.005) was evident. Overall 5-year survival after esophageal resection was 38.9%, being higher among women compared to men (47.5 vs. 36.6%; P<0.001), whereas no gender difference was seen in gastric cancer. During the recent decade, the analyses based on the Swedish National Register for Esophageal and Gastric cancer database demonstrated significant improvements in several important quality indicators of care for patients with esophagogastric cancers. The Swedish National Register for Esophageal and Gastric cancer offers an instrument not only for the control and endorsement of quality of care but also a unique tool for population-based clinical research.
|
|
| 3. |
- Jestin, Christine, et al.
(författare)
-
Geographical differences in cancer treatment and survival for patients with oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junctional cancers.
- 2020
-
Ingår i: British Journal of Surgery. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 0007-1323 .- 1365-2168. ; 107:11, s. 1500-1509
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Only around one-quarter of patients with cancer of the oesophagus and the gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) undergo surgical resection. This population-based study investigated the rates of treatment with curative intent and resection, and their association with survival.METHODS: Patients diagnosed with oesophageal and GOJ cancer between 2006 and 2015 in Sweden were identified from the National Register for Oesophageal and Gastric Cancer (NREV). The NREV was cross-linked with several national registries to obtain information on additional exposures. The annual proportion of patients undergoing treatment with curative intent and surgical resection in each county was calculated, and the counties divided into groups with low, intermediate and high rates. Treatment with curative intent was defined as definitive chemoradiation therapy or surgery, with or without neoadjuvant oncological treatment. Overall survival was analysed using a multilevel model based on county of residence at the time of diagnosis.RESULTS: Some 5959 patients were included, of whom 1503 (25·2 per cent) underwent surgery. Median overall survival after diagnosis was 7·7, 8·8 and 11·1 months respectively in counties with low, intermediate and high rates of treatment with curative intent. Corresponding survival times for the surgical resection groups were 7·4, 9·3 and 11·0 months. In the multivariable analysis, a higher rate of treatment with curative intent (time ratio 1·17, 95 per cent c.i. 1·05 to 1·30; P < 0·001) and a higher resection rate (time ratio 1·24, 1·12 to 1·37; P < 0·001) were associated with improved survival after adjustment for relevant confounders.CONCLUSION: Patients diagnosed in counties with higher rates of treatment with curative intent and higher rates of surgery had better survival.
|
|
| 4. |
- Klevebro, F., et al.
(författare)
-
Association between time interval from neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy to surgery and complete histological tumor response in esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer : a national cohort study
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Diseases of the Esophagus. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1120-8694 .- 1442-2050. ; 33:5
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The optimal time interval from neoadjuvant therapy to surgery in the treatment of esophageal cancer is not known. The aim of this study was to investigate if a prolonged interval between completed neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery was associated with improved histological response rates and survival in a population-based national register cohort. The population-based cohort study included patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy due to cancer in the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Patients were divided into two groups based on the median time from completed neoadjuvant treatment to surgery. The primary outcome was complete histological response. Secondary outcomes were lymph node tumor response, postoperative complications, R0 resection rate, 90-day mortality, and overall survival. In total, 643 patients were included, 344 (54%) patients underwent surgery within 49 days, and 299 (47%) after 50 days or longer. The groups were similar concerning baseline characteristics except for a higher clinical tumor stage (P = 0.009) in the prolonged time to surgery group. There were no significant differences in complete histological response, R0 resection rate, postoperative complications, 90-day mortality, or overall survival. Adjusted odds ratio for ypT0 in the prolonged time to surgery group was 0.99 (95% confidence interval: 0.64-1.53). Complete histological response in the primary tumor (ypT0) was associated with significantly higher overall survival: adjusted hazard ratio: 0.55 (95% CI 0.41-0.76). If lymph node metastases were present in these patients, the survival was, however, significantly lower: adjusted hazard ratio for ypT0N1: 2.30 (95% CI 1.21-4.35). In this prospectively collected, nationwide cohort study of esophageal and junctional type 1 and 2 cancer patients, there were no associations between time to surgery and histological complete response, postoperative outcomes, or overall survival. The results suggest that it is safe for patients to postpone surgery at least 7 to 10 weeks after completed chemoradiotherapy, but no evidence was seen in favor of recommending a prolonged time to surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer. A definitive answer to this question requires a randomized controlled trial of standard vs. prolonged time to surgery.
|
|
| 5. |
- Kung, C. H., et al.
(författare)
-
Impact of surgical resection rate on survival in gastric cancer : nationwide study
- 2021
-
Ingår i: BJS Open. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 2474-9842. ; 5:2
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: There are marked geographical variations in the proportion of patients undergoing resection for gastric cancer. This study investigated the impact of resection rate on survival. METHODS: All patients with potentially curable gastric cancer between 2006 and 2017 were identified from the Swedish National Register of Oesophageal and Gastric Cancer. The annual resection rate was calculated for each county per year. Resection rates in all counties for all years were grouped into tertiles and classified as low, intermediate or high. Survival was analysed using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 3465 patients were diagnosed with potentially curable gastric cancer, and 1934 (55.8 per cent) were resected. Resection rates in the low (1261 patients), intermediate (1141) and high (1063) tertiles were 0-50.0, 50.1-62.5 and 62.6-100 per cent respectively. The multivariable Cox analysis revealed better survival for patients diagnosed in counties during years with an intermediate versus low resection rate (hazard ratio (HR) 0.81, 95 per cent c.i. 0.74 to 0.90; P < 0.001) and high versus low resection rate (HR 0.80, 0.73 to 0.88; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This national register study showed large regional variation in resection rates for gastric cancer. A higher resection rate appeared to be beneficial with regard to overall survival for the entire population.
|
|
