| 1. |
- Desta, Liyew, et al.
(författare)
-
Adherence to beta-blockers and long-term risk of heart failure and mortality after a myocardial infarction
- 2021
-
Ingår i: ESC Heart Failure. - : Wiley. - 2055-5822. ; 8:1, s. 344-355
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aims: The aim of this study is to investigate the association between adherence to beta-blocker treatment after a first acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and long-term risk of heart failure (HF) and death. Methods and results: All patients admitted for a first AMI included in the nationwide Swedish web-system for enhancement and development of evidence-based care in heart disease evaluated according to recommended therapies register between 2005 and 2010 were eligible (n = 71 638). After exclusion of patients who died in-hospital, patients with previous HF, patients with unknown left ventricular ejection fraction (EF), and patients who died during the first year after the index event, 38 608 patients remained in the final analysis. Adherence to prescribed beta-blockers was determined for 1 year after the index event using the national registry for prescribed drugs and was measured as proportion of days covered, the ratio between the numbers of days covered by the dispensed prescriptions and number of days in the period. As customary, a threshold level for proportion of days covered ≥80% was used to classify patients as adherent or non-adherent. At discharge 90.6% (n = 36 869) of all patients were prescribed a beta-blocker. Among 38 608 1 year survivors, 31.1% (n = 12 013) were non-adherent to beta-blockers. Patients with reduced EF without HF and patients with HF with reduced EF were more likely to remain adherent to beta-blockers at 1 year compared with patients with normal EF (NEF) without HF. Being married/cohabiting and having higher income level, hypertension, ST-elevation MI, and percutaneous coronary intervention were associated with better adherence. Adherence was independently associated with lower all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71–0.84] and a lower risk for the composite of HF readmission/death, (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.78–0.89, P value <0.001) during the subsequent 4 years of follow up. These associations were favourable but less apparent in patients with HFNEF and NEF. Conclusions: Nearly one in three AMI patients was non-adherent to beta-blockers within the first year. Adherence was independently associated with improved long-term outcomes; however, uncertainty remains for patients with HFNEF and NEF.
|
|
| 2. |
- Mohammad, Moman A., et al.
(författare)
-
Intravenous beta-blocker therapy in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention is not associated with benefit regarding short-term mortality : a Swedish nationwide observational study
- 2017
-
Ingår i: EuroIntervention. - : Europa Edition. - 1774-024X .- 1969-6213. ; 13:2, s. E210-E218
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aims: Our aim was to investigate the impact of intravenous (IV) beta-blocker therapy on short-term mortality and other in-hospital events in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Methods and results: Using the nationwide Swedish Web-system for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-based care in Heart disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies (SWEDEHEART) registry, we identified all patients with STEMI undergoing PCI between 2006 and 2013. Patients with cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest at presentation were excluded. The primary endpoint was mortality within 30 days. Secondary endpoints were in-hospital events (mortality, cardiogenic shock and left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] <40% at discharge). We adjusted for confounders with a multivariable model and propensity score matching. Out of 16,909 patients, 2,876 (17.0%) were treated with an IV beta-blocker. After adjusting for confounders, the IV beta-blocker group had higher 30-day all-cause mortality (HR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.14-1.83), more in-hospital cardiogenic shock (OR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.09-2.16) and were more often discharged with an LVEF <40% (OR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.51-1.92).Conclusions: In this large nationwide observational study, the use of IV beta-blockers in patients with STEMI treated with primary PCI was associated with higher short-term mortality, lower LVEF at discharge, as well as a higher risk of in-hospital cardiogenic shock.
|
|
| 3. |
- Stagmo, Martin, et al.
(författare)
-
För få kranskärlspatienter får lipidsänkande behandling [Few patients with coronary diseases are receiving lipid-lowering therapy]
- 2002
-
Ingår i: Läkartidningen. - 0023-7205. ; 99:16, s. 9-1802
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- I Sverige finns sedan flera år riktlinjer för hur förhöjda blodfetter bör behandlas hos patienter med kranskärlssjukdom. Generellt är intresset för och kunskapen om lipidbehandling stort inom den svenska läkarkåren. Trots detta nås uppsatta mål för behandling av blodfetter hos endast en minoritet av patienterna, och hälften av dem får inte någon farmakologisk lipidsänkande behandling, enligt en nyligen genomförd enkätundersökning. Det finns dessutom patientgrupper som i lägre grad än andra erbjuds behandling. Om fler patienter med hyperlipidemi och kranskärlssjukdom behandlas med lipidsänkande läkemedel i sådana doser att behandlingsmålen uppnås skulle sjukligheten i kranskärlssjukdom sannolikt minska ytterligare.
|
|
| 4. |
- Svenungsson, Elisabet, et al.
(författare)
-
Antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with myocardial infarction with and without obstructive coronary arteries
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Journal of Internal Medicine. - : Wiley. - 0954-6820 .- 1365-2796. ; 291:3, s. 327-337
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Recent studies demonstrate that prothrombotic antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are overrepresented in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) due to coronary artery disease (MICAD). However, it is not known whether aPL differ between the two subsets of MI: MICAD and MI with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA). Objectives: To determine whether aPL are associated with MINOCA or MICAD, or with hypercoagulability as assessed by activated protein C–protein C inhibitor (APC–PCI) complex. Methods: Well-characterized patients with MINOCA (n = 98), age- and gender-matched patients with MICAD (n = 99), and healthy controls (n = 100) were included in a cross-sectional case–control study. Autoantibodies (IgA/G/M) targeting cardiolipin and β2glycoprotein-I and specific nuclear antigens were analyzed by multiplexed bead technology. The concentration of APC–PCI was determined as a measure of hypercoagulability by an immunofluorometric sandwich assay. Results: Both prevalence and titers of aPL of the IgG isotype (anti-cardiolipin and/or anti-β2glycoprotein-I) were higher in patients with MINOCA and MICAD than in controls. aPL IgG positivity was twice as frequent among patients with MICAD than MINOCA (11% vs. 6%, nonsignificant). We observed no group differences regarding aPL IgA/M or antibodies targeting specific nuclear antigens. Levels of APC–PCI were elevated in aPL IgG-positive compared to aPL IgG-negative MICAD patients. Conclusions: aPL IgG, but not IgA/M, are enriched particularly in patients with MICAD but also in patients with MINOCA, as compared to controls. Interestingly, signs of hypercoagulability—measured by increased levels of the APC–PCI complex—were present in aPL IgG-positive MICAD patients, indicating an association with functional disturbances of the coagulation system.
|
|
