SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Utökad sökning

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Ikeda M) ;mspu:(conferencepaper)"

Sökning: WFRF:(Ikeda M) > Konferensbidrag

  • Resultat 1-10 av 11
Sortera/gruppera träfflistan
   
NumreringReferensOmslagsbildHitta
1.
  • Zeldenrust, SR, et al. (författare)
  • ATTR transplantation consensus panel 2009
  • 2010
  • Ingår i: AMYLOID-JOURNAL OF PROTEIN FOLDING DISORDERS. - 1350-6129. ; 17, s. 74-75
  • Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
  •  
2.
  •  
3.
  •  
4.
  •  
5.
  •  
6.
  •  
7.
  • Dustler, Magnus, et al. (författare)
  • Realism of mammography tissue patches simulated using perlin noise : A forced choice reading study
  • 2021
  • Ingår i: Medical Imaging 2021 : Physics of Medical Imaging - Physics of Medical Imaging. - : SPIE. - 1605-7422. - 9781510640191 ; 11595
  • Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Software breast phantoms are central to the optimization of breast imaging, where in many cases the use of real images would be inefficient - or impossible. Establishing the realism of such phantoms is critical. For this study, patches of simulated breast tissue with different composition - fatty, scattered, heterogenous and dense tissue - were generated using a method based on Perlin noise. The composition of the patches is controlled by numerical parameters derived from input by radiologists and medical physicists with experience of breast imaging. Separate Perlin noise-based methods were used to simulate skin pores, high-frequency noise (representing quantum and electronic noise) and ligaments and vascular structures. In a forced choice reading study, the realism of the simulated tissue patches compared to patches from real mammograms was determined. Patches of 200-500 pixels were extracted from radiolucent, linear, nodular or homogenous (10 per category) mammograms randomly selected from a previously acquired dataset. Eighteen simulated patches in the same size range were added. Four readers, two radiologists and two medical physicists were shown the images in random order and asked to rate them as real or simulated. All readers accepted a substantial fraction of simulated images as real, ranging from 22% to 72%. Only two readers showed a significant difference in the number of images rated real in the real and simulated groups, 22% vs 73% (P=.0003) and 33% vs 63% (P=.04), respectively. These results suggest that the method employed can create images that are almost indistinguishable from patches of real mammograms.
  •  
8.
  •  
9.
  •  
10.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Resultat 1-10 av 11

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy