| 1. |
- Tabiri, S, et al.
(författare)
-
- 2021
-
swepub:Mat__t
|
|
| 2. |
- Bravo, L, et al.
(författare)
-
- 2021
-
swepub:Mat__t
|
|
| 3. |
- Glasbey, JC, et al.
(författare)
-
- 2021
-
swepub:Mat__t
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Duchesne, Juan, et al.
(författare)
-
Delta Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) Can be a Stronger Predictor of Mortality Than Pre-Aortic Occlusion SBP in Non-Compressible Torso Hemorrhage : an Abotrauma and AORTA Analysis
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Shock. - : Biomedical Press. - 1073-2322 .- 1540-0514. ; 56:1S, s. 30-36
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is becoming a standardized adjunct for the management in patients with severe non-compressible torso hemorrhage (NCTH). Although guidelines have been developed to help with the best indications for REBOA utilization, no studies have addressed the significance of change in systolic blood pressure (ΔSBP) after REBOA insufflation. We hypothesized that ΔSBP would predict mortality in patients with NCTH and have utility as a surrogate marker for hemorrhage status.STUDY DESIGN: This was an international, multicenter retrospective review of all patients managed with REBOA from the ABOTrauma Registry and the AORTA database. ΔSBP was defined as the difference between pre- and post-REBOA insertion SBP. Based on post-insertion SBP, patient hemorrhage status was categorized as responder or non-responder. A non-responder was defined as a hypotensive patient with systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 90 mmHg after REBOA placement with full aortic occlusion. Significance was set at P < 0.05.RESULTS: A total of 524 patients with NCTH were included. Most (74%) were male, 77% blunt injured with a median (IQR) age of 40 (27 - 58) years and ISS 34 (25 - 45). Overall mortality was 51.0%. 20% of patients were classified as non-responders. Demographic and injury descriptors did not differ between groups. Mortality was significantly higher in non-responders vs responders (64% vs 46%, respectively; P = 0.001). Non-responders had lower median pre-insertion SBP (50mmHg vs 67mmHg; P < 0.001) and lower ΔSBP (20mmHg vs 48mmHg; P < 0.001).CONCLUSION: REBOA non-responders present and remain persistently hypotensive and are more likely to die than responders, indicating a potential direct correlation between ΔSBP as a surrogate marker of hemorrhage volume status and mortality. Future prospective studies will need to further elucidate the impact of Damage Control Resuscitation efforts on ΔSBP and mortality.
|
|
| 8. |
- Duchesne, Juan, et al.
(författare)
-
To Ultrasound or not to Ultrasound : A REBOA Femoral Access Analysis from the ABOTrauma and AORTA Registries
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Journal of endovascular resuscitation and trauma management. - Örebro : Society of Endovascular Resuscitation and Trauma Management in cooperation with Örebro University Hospital. - 2002-7567. ; 4:2, s. 80-87
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is becoming a standardized adjunct in the management of non-compressible hemorrhage. Ultrasound (US)-guided femoral access has been taught as the best practice for femoral artery cannulation. However, there is a lack of evidence to support its use in patients in extremis with severe hemorrhage. We hypothesize that no differences in outcome will exist between US-guided and to blind percutaneous or cutdown access methods.Methods: This was an international, multicenter retrospective review of all patients managed with REBOA from the ABOTrauma Registry and the AORTA database. REBOA characteristics and outcomes were compared among puncture access methods. Significance was set at P < 0.05.Results: The cohort included 523 patients, primarily male (74%), blunt injured (77%), with median age 40 (27-58), and an Injury Severity Score of 34 (25-45). Percutaneous using external landmarks/palpation was the most common femoral puncture method (53%) used followed by US-guided (27.9%). There was no significant difference in overall complication rates (37.4% vs 34.9%; P = 0.615) or mortality (47.8% vs 50.3%; P = 0.599) between percutaneous and US-guided methods; however, access by cutdown was significantly associated with emergency department (ED) mortality (P = 0.004), 24 hour mortality (P = 0.002), and in-hospital mortality (P = 0.007).Conclusions: In patients with severe hemorrhage in need of REBOA placement, the percutaneous approach using anatomic landmarks and palpation, when compared with US-guided femoral access, was used more frequently without an increase in complications, access attempts, or mortality.
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
