| 1. |
- Edenius, Lars, et al.
(författare)
-
Referensområden som verktyg för viltförvaltningsunderlag
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Fakta. Skog. - 1400-7789.
-
Annan publikation (populärvet., debatt m.m.)abstract
- Referensområden är områden där vi följer populationer av älg och andra viltarter, samt förändringar i landskapet, mer intensivt.Referensområden är viktiga för att utveckla övervakningsmetoder och skaffa sig bra kunskap om hur systemet fungerar, för utbildning, samt som demonstrationsområden.Referensområden förväntas bli en viktig komponent i den nya ekosystembaserade viltförvaltningen.Slaktvikter, reproduktionsdata, åldersstruktur, älgtäthet, fodermängder, betestryck och skogsskador är exempel på data som är relevanta att samla in i referensområden för den nya älgförvaltningens behov.SLU har flera områden och försöksparker som kan utvecklas till nationella referensområden.Fördjupad övervakning inom referensområden är ett viktigt komplement till förvaltningsinventeringar inom miljöanalys och viltövervakning.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Rigato, Cristina, 1989, et al.
(författare)
-
Audiometric comparison in BCI and BAHA matched patients
- 2015
-
Annan publikation (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Purpose: Patients that are suffering from outer or middle ear hearing impairment can often benefit more from rehabilitation using bone conduction devices (BCDs) rather than conventional air conduction devices. The most widely used BCD is the percutaneous Bone Anchored Hearing Aid (BAHA), which gives excellent sound, but can cause side effects from the skin penetration abutment. There is a growing interest in the development of transcutaneous BCDs such as the Bone Conduction Implant (BCI), comprising an externally worn audio processor wirelessly driving a transducer implanted in the temporal bone. In an ongoing clinical study, the device is used in six patients and the objective with this study is to compare their audiometric results with patients using the BAHA.Methods & Materials: Audiometric measurements are currently carried out on patients using a BAHA (Ponto Pro Power, Oticon Medical) that are matched one by one according to age- and hearing loss-based criteria with the six first patients treated with the BCI. In particular, warble tone thresholds, speech recognition score (SRS) in noise, speech recognition threshold (SRT) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) threshold are compared in a sound field. The patients’ general health status and personal satisfaction is also evaluated using Glasgow Benefit Inventory and Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit questionnaires. Furthermore, maximum power output and total harmonic distortion are measured for each device on a skullsimulator.Results: The study is on-going and detailed results will be presented. Preliminary results from two patients tested with the BAHA indicate that they generally perform the same or slightly worse than matched patients with BCI regarding warble tone thresholds, SRS, SRT and SNR threshold. The self-reported questionnaires show in general similar outcome for both devices, but slightly better results for BCI compared with the BAHA concerning physical benefit and avoidance of negative reactions to unpleasant sounds.Conclusion: Preliminary results from audiometric measurements show a clear improvement over the unaided condition for both devices, and indicate that the BCI is equal or slightly better
|
|
| 4. |
- Rigato, Cristina, 1989, et al.
(författare)
-
Audiometric results of the Bone Conduction Implant: a comparative study with the Bone Anchored Hearing Aid
- 2015
-
Annan publikation (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background:Patients suffering from conductive-, sensorineural- or mixed hearing loss that are unable to use conventional air conduction hearing aids, can often be rehabilitated with bone conduction devices (BCDs) . The most widely used BCD is the percutaneous Bone Anchored Hearing Aid (BAHA), which gives excellent sound but has some known complications related to the side effects from the skin penetration. In order to overcome such issues, the development of transcutaneous BCDs has increased. Among them, the Bone Conduction Implant (BCI) is an active BCD developed in Gothenburg, Sweden. It comprises an externally worn audio processor unit which is magnetically attached to an implanted unit to wirelessly drive a transducer in the temporal bone. The device is currently implanted in six patients in the clinical trial phase and the objective with this study is to compare the BCI and BAHA devices.Methods:Audiometric measurements are currently carried out on BCI and BAHA patients matched one by one according to age- and hearing loss-based criteria. In particular, pure tones hearing thresholds, speech recognition threshold (SRT) in quiet and speech recognition score (SRS) in noise are compared as well as signal to noise ratio (SNR). In addition, maximum power output (MPO) and total harmonic distortion (THD) are measured for each device on a skullsimulator in an anechoic chamber. The patients’ satisfaction and general health condition are also evaluated by means of questionnaires. Results:Results from three patients tested with the BAHA indicate that they generally perform as or slightly worse than matched patients with BCI in all tested audiometric measurements. The self-reported questionnaires show in general similar outcome for both devices, with slightly better results for BCI compared with the BAHA concerning physical benefit and avoidance of negative reactions to unpleasant sounds.Conclusions:Results from audiometric measurements show a clear improvement over the unaided condition for both devices, and indicate that the BCI is equal or slightly better than the BAHA. As this is a pilot study currently ongoing, the results may change when all six BCI patients have been matched with a BAHA patient.
|
|
