| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Berg, Jan, et al.
(författare)
-
In-ear vs. loudspeaker monitoring for live Sound and the effect on audio quality attributes and musical performance
- 2017
-
Ingår i: 142nd Audio Engineering Society International Convention 2017, AES 2017.
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- A successful performance of live music is dependent on how well musicians can hear themselves and the other members of the ensemble. Sound reinforcement systems can offer monitoring either by on-stage loudspeakers or in-ear headphones. These two monitoring conditions were compared to search for perceived auditory differences that affect parts of musical performance. Four jazz/pop/rock bands made live performances where monitor sound was provided to the musicians. Each band repeated their performance, changing from one monitoring condition to the other. After every performance, the musicians responded to questionnaires covering musical performance and audio quality. Experts also assessed recordings of the performances. Results show that perceived differences exist in audio quality and musical performance between loudspeaker monitors and in-ear headphone monitors.
|
|
| 3. |
- Delios, A., et al.
(författare)
-
Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. - : Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. - 0027-8424 .- 1091-6490. ; 119:30
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This initiative examined systematically the extent to which a large set of archival research findings generalizes across contexts. We repeated the key analyses for 29 original strategic management effects in the same context (direct reproduction) as well as in 52 novel time periods and geographies; 45% of the reproductions returned results matching the original reports together with 55% of tests in different spans of years and 40% of tests in novel geographies. Some original findings were associated with multiple new tests. Reproducibility was the best predictor of generalizability-for the findings that proved directly reproducible, 84% emerged in other available time periods and 57% emerged in other geographies. Overall, only limited empirical evidence emerged for context sensitivity. In a forecasting survey, independent scientists were able to anticipate which effects would find support in tests in new samples.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- McMillion, Alan, 1949-
(författare)
-
Labile Verbs in English : Their Meaning, Behavior and Structure
- 2006
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- English has many verbs that syntactically occur in both transitive and intransitive clausal patterns. A subset of such verbs are called labile verbs, and these have a causative sense when they occur in the transitive pattern and a non-causative or inchoative sense in the intransitive pattern. Moreover, the object of the transitive pattern corresponds to the subject of the intransitive, e.g. she broke the window / the window broke. There are over 800 labile verbs in Present-day English. The central criterion for distinguishing labile verbs from other similarly alternating verbs is the switch in causativity.This study is an investigation of the meanings, patterning and behavior of Present-day English labile verbs. It also investigates the development of these verbs historically. Diachronically, the number of labile verbs in English has steadily increased since the Old English period, unlike any of the sister Germanic languages. Labile verbs developed from both transitive and intransitive verbs.The investigation also attempts to explain the behavior of labile verbs in terms of the notions result- and process-orientation, lexical event structures and compositionality of lexical verbs with clause level constructions.
|
|
| 6. |
- Nykänen, Arne, 1973-, et al.
(författare)
-
Do In-ear monitors protect musicians' hearing?
- 2017
-
Ingår i: 142nd Audio Engineering Society International Convention 2017, AES 2017.
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- In-ear monitors for live performances are commonly considered to give better sound quality than loudspeaker monitors. They are also often assumed to reduce sound exposure. Because of lack of evidence for this, sound exposure for pop/rock/jazz musicians was compared between performances with in-ear and loudspeaker monitors. Equivalent sound pressure levels at the musicians' ears were 94 to 105 dBA with loudspeaker and 86 to 108 dBA with in-ear monitors. Many participants used earplugs when using loudspeaker monitors. Therefore, the recommendation, from a pure hearing protection perspective, is to use loudspeaker monitors and earplugs. However, the large spread in levels between musicians using in-ear monitors suggests that with better training and measurements of sound exposure, in-ear monitors could be used safely.
|
|
