| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Carlsson, Vanja, 1985, et al.
(författare)
-
“It is controlling, but you don’t really care.” : Researchers’ perceptions of legitimation of research policy
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Science and Public Policy. - : Oxford University Press. - 0302-3427 .- 1471-5430.
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Starting from the tension between scientific autonomy and state governing in research policy, the aim of this article is to examine how researchers who apply for funding in Sweden perceive the legitimate grounds for a new research policy in which sex and gender perspectives are integrated as criteria in assessing scientific quality. Our results show that researcher’s perception of themselves, and of the purpose of research, is compatible with dominant ideals in contemporary academic landscape, where knowledge is treated as a deliverable to external stakeholders or to meet politically formulated goals. However, according to researchers, the legitimate sources of policy influence originate from their own profession or the common interest of the people, explicitly expressed by citizens. Researchers are questioning, and find strategies to avoid, top-down state governing.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Johansson Wilén, Evelina, 1985, et al.
(författare)
-
Jämställdhetspolitik som ideologi eller vetenskap? En analys av debatten om jämställdhetsintegrering i akademin
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Tidskrift för Genusvetenskap. - 1654-5443. ; 42:1, s. 13-34
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In this article we analyze the public debate on gender mainstreaming of higher education and research in Sweden between 2016-2020, focusing on 1) positions that advocate the gender equality initiatives and 2) positions that criticize them. A recurring theme in the defense and the critique of gender mainstreaming is whether gender mainstreaming policies should be understood as ideologically driven or not and how this relates to the university's scientific task. In the analysis, we focus on which understanding of the relationship between science and politics that appears in the empirical material and how this - explicitly or implicitly - expresses different understandings of ideology and its relation to science. We find that both sides tend to build on either a negative or a functionalist/positive conception of ideology, and we argue that an epistemic approach to ideology paves the way for a more nuanced and reflexive scientific debate on the relationship between politics and knowledge.
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
