| 1. |
- Lawler, M., et al.
(författare)
-
The European Cancer Patient's Bill of Rights, update and implementation 2016
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Esmo Open. - : Elsevier BV. - 2059-7029. ; 1:6
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In this implementation phase of the European Cancer Patient's Bill of Rights (BoR), we confirm the following three patient-centred principles that underpin this initiative: 1. The right of every European citizen to receive the most accurate information and to be proactively involved in his/her care. 2. The right of every European citizen to optimal and timely access to a diagnosis and to appropriate specialised care, underpinned by research and innovation. 3. The right of every European citizen to receive care in health systems that ensure the best possible cancer prevention, the earliest possible diagnosis of their cancer, improved outcomes, patient rehabilitation, best quality of life and affordable health care. Agree our high-level goal. The vision of 70% longterm survival for patients with cancer in 2035, promoting cancer prevention and cancer control and the associated progress in ensuring good patient experience and quality of life. Establish the major mechanisms to underpin its delivery. (1) The systematic and rigorous sharing of best practice between and across European cancer healthcare systems and (2) the active promotion of Research and Innovation focused on improving outcomes; (3) Improving access to new and established cancer care by sharing best practice in the development, approval, procurement and reimbursement of cancer diagnostic tests and treatments. Work with other organisations to bring into being a Europe based centre that will (1) systematically identify, evaluate and validate and disseminate best practice in cancer management for the different countries and regions and (2) promote Research and Innovation and its translation to maximise its impact to improve outcomes.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Bjordal, K, et al.
(författare)
-
A 12 country field study of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) and the head and neck cancer specific module (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) in head and neck patients
- 2000
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Cancer. - 1879-0852. ; 36:14, s. 1796-1807
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This study tests the reliability and validity of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) head and neck cancer module (QLQ-H&N35) and version 3.0 of the EORTC Core Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in 622 head and neck cancer patients from 12 countries. The patients completed the QLQ-C30, the QLQ-H&N35 and a debriefing questionnaire before antineoplastic treatment or at a follow-up. 232 patients receiving treatment completed a second questionnaire after treatment. Compliance was high and the questionnaire was well accepted by the patients. Multitrait scaling analysis confirmed the proposed scale structure of the QLQ-H&N35. The QLQ-H&N35 was responsive to differences between disease status, site and patients with different Karnofsky performance status, and to changes over time. The new physical functioning scale (with a four-point response format) of version 3.0 of the QLQ-C30 was shown to be more reliable than previous versions. Thus, the QLQ-H&N35, in conjunction with the QLQ-C30, appears to be reliable, valid and applicable to broad multicultural samples of head and neck cancer patients.
|
|
| 7. |
- Jerkeman, Mats, et al.
(författare)
-
CHOP versus MACOP-B in aggressive lymphoma--a Nordic Lymphoma Group randomised trial
- 1999
-
Ingår i: Annals of Oncology. - 1569-8041. ; 10:9, s. 1079-1086
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: The long-term survival of patients with advanced stage aggressive lymphoma has not improved significantly during the last twenty years. In a randomised trial, the efficacy of MACOP-B, a six-drug weekly chemotherapy regimen, was compared to CHOP, the current standard regimen, in terms of overall and failure-free survival, toxicity and health related quality of life. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred five patients with aggressive lymphoma, stage II-IV, age 18-67, were randomised to receive either 12 weeks of MACOP-B or 8 courses of CHOP over 24 weeks. Special emphasis was put in the definition of Ann Arbor stage in extranodal disease. A subset of 95 patients also entered a quality of life study, based on the EORTC QLQ-C30. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were ineligible. Among the remaining 374 patients, the median age was 52 years. According to the age-adjusted International Prognostic Index, 37% were 'high-intermediate' or 'high-risk' patients. No difference could be demonstrated, either in overall survival (60% at five years in the MACOP-B group and 59% in the CHOP group) or in failure-free survival (47% at five years with MACOP-B and 44% with CHOP). In terms of quality of life, physical function and global quality of life were more impaired in patients receiving MACOP-B, who also exhibited more non-haematological toxicity. CONCLUSION: No superiority of MACOP-B compared to CHOP could be demonstrated. CHOP remains the treatment of choice in low-risk patients. At present, intensified or experimental treatment should be reserved for high-risk disease.
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
- Jerkeman, Mats, et al.
(författare)
-
Health-related quality of life and its potential prognostic implications in patients with aggressive lymphoma: a Nordic Lymphoma Group Trial
- 2001
-
Ingår i: Medical Oncology. - 1559-131X. ; 18:1, s. 85-94
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This study was conducted to explore treatment and disease-related effects on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with aggressive lymphoma, to identify predictors for impaired long-term HRQoL, and to analyze the prognostic value of pretreatment HRQoL. Ninety-five patients with aggressive lymphoma, constituting a subset of a randomized multicenter trial comparing CHOP and MACOP-B, entered a HRQoL study, using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Patient scores were compared to scores from an age- and gender-adjusted reference population sample, and evaluation of the prognostic value of pretreatment QoL scores in relation to clinical prognostic factors was performed. Before treatment, patients exhibited lower scores of global QoL, physical, role, and social functions, and more appetite loss, compared to the reference population. Role functioning improved compared to baseline, but remained depressed compared to the reference group more than 8 mo after end of treatment. By then, the patient group displayed no difference in other HRQoL variables compared to that of the reference population. No reliable predictor for impaired long-term HRQoL could be identified. In multivariate analysis, including the factors of the International Prognostic Index, pretreatment global QoL was an independent prognostic marker for overall survival. In conclusion, in this population with aggressive lymphoma and favorable prognostic features, HRQoL was not substantially affected during the first year after diagnosis. Pretreatment global QoL may constitute a significant prognostic factor, meriting further investigation in prospective studies.
|
|
| 10. |
- Jordhoy, M S, et al.
(författare)
-
A palliative-care intervention and death at home: a cluster randomised trial
- 2000
-
Ingår i: The Lancet. - 1474-547X. ; 356:9233, s. 888-893
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: The Palliative Medicine Unit at University Hospital of Trondheim, Norway, started an intervention programme that aims to enable patients to spend more time at home and die there if they prefer. Close cooperation was needed with the community health-care professionals, who acted as the principal formal caregivers, and a multidisciplinary consultant team coordinated the care. We did a cluster randomised trial to assess the intervention's effectiveness compared with conventional care METHODS: Community health-care districts in and around Trondheim, Norway, were defined as the clusters to be randomised. We enrolled 434 patients (235 assigned intervention and 199 conventional care [controls]) in these districts who had incurable malignant disease and an expected survival of 2-9 months. Main outcomes were place of death and time spent in institutions in the last month of life. FINDINGS: 395 patients died. Of these, more intervention patients than controls died at home (54 [25%] vs 26 [15%], p<0.05). The time spent at home was not significantly increased, although intervention patients spent a smaller proportion of time in nursing homes in the last month of life than did controls (7.2 vs 14.6%, p<0.05). Hospital use was similar in the two groups. INTERPRETATION: The palliative-care intervention enabled more patients to die at home. More resources for care in the home (palliative care training and staff) and an increased focus on use of nursing homes would be necessary, however, to increase time at home and reduce hospital admissions.
|
|
